lisa-colette 6,035 Posted August 31, 2016 So Hans is not happy with Matt Ford then. Shock horror, another promoter he's fallen out with then! Mind you, it does appear to be Ford in the wrong here.Cos Matt said he'd prob be put for rest of the season?? Unless I'm missing something, it is hardly something to fall out over? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KEITH M 850 Posted August 31, 2016 This is a serious question because alcohol and recreationial drugs in my 20's have ruined my memory, but didn't Poole bring in THJ for Gaforuv one year? I freely admit I might be imagining that.This is a serious question Have I seen a reply off Steve Shovlar to your question or did I dream it as I never seem to see his replies when a sensible question is asked to him which requires an answer from him? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Col 854 Posted September 1, 2016 Don't eant to go with guests. Look what happened Monday night! If we lose we lose as a team and the team we have had nearly all season. Be much sweeter to win with our team not like Wolves bringing in a ringer for the playoffs. ABW. Because Poole have never bought in ringers for the playoffs 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mdmc82 2,878 Posted September 1, 2016 And depends how injured he is and if we have replaced him with Piotr Pawlicki. He was back riding and scoring well yesterday so luckily for you he is no longer out Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
A ORLOV 8,628 Posted September 1, 2016 So Hans admission that his injury is not as bad as thought and that he will probably be able to ride has upset Matts thought to claim he cannot ride through injury and bring in a ringer for the play offs, ah what a shame. 5 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
foreverblue 6,096 Posted September 1, 2016 Dont think Matt Ford wanted team changes or saw Hans injury as a opportunity to improve the team but of a rider has broken a hand which was the original diagnosis then he would be out for the season Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Wolfsbane 12,944 Posted September 1, 2016 (edited) And depends how injured he is and if we have replaced him with Piotr Pawlicki. Sam paid 13 in Denmark yesterday so appears ok. Nice try though Steve. Edited September 1, 2016 by Wolfsbane Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
stevebrum 6,824 Posted September 1, 2016 He was back riding and scoring well yesterday so luckily for you he is no longer out it's a win win then. Sam paid 13 in Denmark yesterday so appears ok. Nice try though Steve. One can hope! 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
foreverblue 6,096 Posted September 1, 2016 With the new averages i see Kurtz is the same average as Bjarne, does this mean the team manager can choose who is at reserve? I also see Buckowski is now more or less the same average he was at the start of the season which just shows how bad he has been lately. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NeilWatson 1,988 Posted September 1, 2016 (edited) With the new averages i see Kurtz is the same average as Bjarne, does this mean the team manager can choose who is at reserve? I also see Buckowski is now more or less the same average he was at the start of the season which just shows how bad he has been lately. When the averages are identical the order remains as per the previous Green Sheet, so I woułd assume Bjarne remains at reserve. (Art 16.3.1). Edited September 5, 2016 by NeilWatson Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Shale Searcher 1,264 Posted September 1, 2016 When the averages are identical the order remains as per the previous Green Sheet, so Bjarne remains at reserve. If Krzysztofs average is about the same, saying he is poor is incorrect, as is saying he has improved!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
foreverblue 6,096 Posted September 1, 2016 If Krzysztofs average is about the same, saying he is poor is incorrect, as is saying he has improved!! I didn't say he was poor just that he has been bad lately as his average has dropped back to what he started on as has Hans average. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mdmc82 2,878 Posted September 1, 2016 I didn't say he was poor just that he has been bad lately as his average has dropped back to what he started on as has Hans average. The difference is Kaspazak started on an assessed average Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
foreverblue 6,096 Posted September 1, 2016 (edited) The difference is Kaspazak started on an assessed average We were talking about Buckowski not Kasprzak. Neither started on an assessed average. Edited September 1, 2016 by foreverblue 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NeilWatson 1,988 Posted September 1, 2016 We were talking about Buckowski not Kasprzak. Neither started on an assessed average. They both started with an assessed average. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
