scoobydoo 2,254 Posted June 14, 2022 (edited) 13 minutes ago, Flappy said: Sedgman or Thomson then plus a Dane who's been here before Neither any better than what we have Sedgmen had plenty of chances always fails , Thomson isnt that good very hit n miss , If the Dane is Kildemand it will be worse not better than whats there now Edited June 14, 2022 by scoobydoo Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
stevehone 3,430 Posted June 14, 2022 wonder if Zach Cook is one of them? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TTT 1,229 Posted June 14, 2022 4 hours ago, Bald Bloke said: I'm big enough to own it mate. Some might think i made it up, but i don't do that. Ully was certainly riding for his place by the looks of it last night I was listening to the meeting on BBC Radio Cambridgeshire and it did sound like Ostergaard was giving it 150%. Could've easily ended up with a paid maximum. Might be too late for him to survive the team reshuffle though. 50/50 between him and Nicholls and I think we would stick with Nicholls out of the two due to experience around the technical tracks plus he's also the captain which could work in his favour. Hans 100% goner imo. Think he's a small track rider these days and he can no longer handle the fast Panthers circuit. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TTT 1,229 Posted June 14, 2022 I'm sticking with Janowski. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Roger Jacobs 554 Posted June 15, 2022 8 hours ago, Bald Bloke said: Thanks for that. I wasn't sure when it came into effect. Maybe an announcement soon. I check here: https://britishspeedway.co.uk/2022-premiership-declarations/ They messed-up the Ipswich averages in Issue 7, and had to issue an amendment! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Noodles 1,337 Posted June 15, 2022 10 hours ago, scoobydoo said: Neither any better than what we have Sedgmen had plenty of chances always fails , Thomson isnt that good very hit n miss , If the Dane is Kildemand it will be worse not better than whats there now Agreed. Absolutely no improvement in those changes. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TTT 1,229 Posted June 15, 2022 (edited) New averages are out. Toft 7.12 Harris 6.90 Ostergaard 6.62 Hans 6.49 Scotty 6.23 Basso 4.85 = 38.21 Edited June 15, 2022 by TTT 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tellboy 3,662 Posted June 15, 2022 39 minutes ago, TTT said: New averages are out. Toft 7.12 Harris 6.90 Ostergaard 6.62 Hans 6.49 Scotty 6.23 Basso 4.85 = 38.21 Blimey,you make it sound like all the riders have new averages,only Basso's has changed remember from the 20th 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Flappy 1,605 Posted June 15, 2022 Any of Ostergaard, Andersen and Nicholls could go and not have an argument. To fit the main signing in at number one 2 of the 3 have to go. Getting the best available second rider is the biggest challenge Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Roger Jacobs 554 Posted June 16, 2022 9 hours ago, tellboy said: Blimey,you make it sound like all the riders have new averages,only Basso's has changed remember from the 20th And that new Basso average has reduced any replacement options by 0.85. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dontforgetthefueltapsbruv 10,706 Posted June 16, 2022 3 minutes ago, Roger Jacobs said: And that new Basso average has reduced any replacement options by 0.85. Not if the change is made in these days before his achieved average becomes effective Another anomaly is the basket case regulations. Boro could redeclare up to the limit and the next day be legitimately 0.85 over it the next day without anyone turning a wheel..... 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tellboy 3,662 Posted June 16, 2022 19 minutes ago, dontforgetthefueltapsbruv said: Not if the change is made in these days before his achieved average becomes effective Another anomaly is the basket case regulations. Boro could redeclare up to the limit and the next day be legitimately 0.85 over it the next day without anyone turning a wheel..... Totally agree,once anyone like Basso gets a new average that should become effective straight away.As you have said above what teams can do,and have done in the past it's quite stupid that they don't become effective straight away.The same with the monthly averages really,done on the 23rd effective 7/8 days later. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
scoobydoo 2,254 Posted June 16, 2022 1 hour ago, dontforgetthefueltapsbruv said: Not if the change is made in these days before his achieved average becomes effective Another anomaly is the basket case regulations. Boro could redeclare up to the limit and the next day be legitimately 0.85 over it the next day without anyone turning a wheel..... Didn't something like this happen last season with Craig Cook at Ipswich just before a meeting against Peterborough Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
arnieg 3,644 Posted June 16, 2022 1 hour ago, tellboy said: Totally agree,once anyone like Basso gets a new average that should become effective straight away.As you have said above what teams can do,and have done in the past it's quite stupid that they don't become effective straight away.The same with the monthly averages really,done on the 23rd effective 7/8 days later. You need a minimum of 2 days to allow for team declarations for matches on the first of the month, and a couple of days to catch any errors (there seem to be increasingly more occasions of these of late). But it wouldn't be unreasonable to reduce it to say 5 days. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dontforgetthefueltapsbruv 10,706 Posted June 16, 2022 2 hours ago, scoobydoo said: Didn't something like this happen last season with Craig Cook at Ipswich just before a meeting against Peterborough I think it may well have done Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
