Birmingham Brummies 2023

[ruffdiamond 6,115]

3 hours ago, False dawn said:

 

I didn't say it was valid or might work in Nick's favour. I'm just guessing in the absence of any public facts. Like everyone else.

 

It's seems the only public facts are that, he refused a 2nd test and is asking to delay the hearing.

Clutching at straws?

Edited July 27, 2023 by ruffdiamond

[Petecc 352]

1 hour ago, StephenMiller said:

The potential planning development for Perry Barr has been picked up by the Birmingham Mail now :-

https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news/perry-barr-stadium-greyhound-speedway-27399974

Slow news day, just reporting old news to fill their Internet gaps.

[scampispeedway 67]

Anyone refusing to take a drugs test should be treated like a drink driving refusal to take provide a breath sample at the road

side or taking a test at the police station and are therefore banned for the maximum time allowed when taking to court.

 

Edited July 27, 2023 by scampispeedway

[kopite92 25]

39 minutes ago, ruffdiamond said:

It's seems the only public facts are that, he refused 2 tests and is asking to delay the hearing.

Clutching at straws?

He took a test.

[ruffdiamond 6,115]

5 minutes ago, kopite92 said:

He took a test.

Ok, when did he take a test, was it on the evening in question?

[uk_martin 1,606]

1 hour ago, ruffdiamond said:

Ok, when did he take a test, was it on the evening in question?

http://www.birmingham-speedway.com/news.php?extend.3329

So, the Brummies have a "facility" until the hearing date of 16th August. What happens after that? Assuming that his defence is no better than anyone else's defence for not complying with testing procedure, and he gets a ban off the SCB, then what?  More facilities until the end of the year?  Is there a record for the fewest number of meetings a team has ever appeared with a full complement of 7 "own" riders, in a 2-season period? Ironically one of the few wins this year was when they actually did field their own 7-man team.  

[kopite92 25]

1 hour ago, ruffdiamond said:

Ok, when did he take a test, was it on the evening in question?

Yes

[Fromafar 10,364]

6 minutes ago, kopite92 said:

Yes

He obviously didn’t comply with rules of the Test then.Judging by the above Post.Or he failed the Test.

[ruffdiamond 6,115]

24 minutes ago, Fromafar said:

He obviously didn’t comply with rules of the Test then.Judging by the above Post.Or he failed the Test.

Dodgy test?,,,, or 'Test dodgy'?

[kopite92 25]

The test result was non negative. The 2nd test wasn’t done, not refused like some have said.

[lisa-colette 6,032]

2 minutes ago, kopite92 said:

The test result was non negative. The 2nd test wasn’t done, not refused like some have said.

Because..? 

[ruffdiamond 6,115]

1 minute ago, kopite92 said:

The test result was non negative. The 2nd test wasn’t done, not refused like some have said.

So, the test was positive,,, then everyone left?(so no 2nd test could be carried out).

[Fromafar 10,364]

6 minutes ago, kopite92 said:

The test result was non negative. The 2nd test wasn’t done, not refused like some have said.

No doubt he wasn’t aware 2nd Test was required.!!!!!!!!

[kopite92 25]

5 minutes ago, lisa-colette said:

Because..? 

All of this will become clear after the hearing 

[ruffdiamond 6,115]

4 minutes ago, kopite92 said:

All of this will become clear after the hearing 

Unlike the test result?