Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 01/03/2025 in Posts
-
He struggled last time he rode Plymouth only scored 15pts from 5 rides. The track has been improved since then.3 points
-
3 points
-
Agree 100% pal there a funny breed always wanting to be a big fish in a pond without development of the riders in the league below but also not prepared to be involved in the top league aswell2 points
-
Final Result 1st Kurtz 2nd J Holder 3rd C Holder 4th Rew Top 4 scorers Kurtz 18 J Holder 15 C Holder 15 Rew 132 points
-
After 4 rides each Kurtz 11 C Holder 11 Fricke 10 J Holder 10 Rew 9 Tungate 8 Lidsey 6 B Cook 6 Z Cook 62 points
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
6 good riders signed for Kent. Everyone including Naylor is surprised he isn't included. Certainly should be winning all the home meetings. Somewhere between 1st and 3rd in the table i suspect which is nothing to be sniffed at.1 point
-
1 point
-
At least double, and worse --- he'd demand it all in the shape of a huge guarantee per match. Klindt is indeed the ultimate gating tart, but as he usually gates he'll give Plymouth a high-scoring #1 at a reasonable cost.1 point
-
Final line-up Kurtz C Holder Rew J Holder scorers 5 to 8 Fricke 11 Tungate 9 Lidsey 9 Z Cook 81 point
-
SF 1 Kurtz, Rew, Fricke, Lidsey. SF 2 C Holder, J Holder, Tungate, Z Cook Bottom 8 scorers Pickering 7 B Cook 6 McDiarmid 5 Ryan 4 Pearson 3 West 3 Hamilton 2 Cluff 21 point
-
Full live updates on there -Hagon is in the support class today. Can you not use your phone ?1 point
-
1 point
-
In the Championship last year Ben Trigger only failed to score in 1 meeting. One of his best meetings for Redcar was at Plymouth. Should be an improvement again this year. I know it will bring Plymouth under a point below the limit but he seems to be the best of the rest, IMO.1 point
-
well after 1st 4 heats of aussie 1st round kurtz, chris holder , rew, and jack holder winners1 point
-
Commercial reasons? I won't be attending on a Monday, I thought it was a real success last year1 point
-
https://www.facebook.com/groups/210443765632762/permalink/28525751370341956/? An evening with Scott Nicholls, hosted by Craig Saul, on January 17th. The event is kindly sponsored by KIM SYSTEMS THIS EVENT HAS NOW SOLD OUT. A WAIT LIST IS IN OPERATION, EMAIL THE SUPPORTERS CLUB TO JOIN IT.1 point
-
I get the feeling you guys and Birmingham will end up with Steve Worrall. Troy bachelor. Lewis kerr. Etc. Maybe as a short term signing until somebody becomes available If somebody was serious about joining their would have been word on it by now.1 point
-
Been meaning to look at the rising star options based on averages, fairest way to do it is using Championship averages - they all have one. Leon Flint (6.85) picked 4th Jordan Jenkins (6.37) picked 3rd Jason Edwards (6.34) picked 1st Joe Thompson (5.77) not picked Dan Gilkes (5.21) not picked Ashton Boughen (5.16) picked 2nd Nathan Ablitt (5.04) not picked Sam Hagon (4.85) protected by Leicester Luke Harrison (4.43) not picked Jake Mulford (4.38) protected by Belle Vue Vinnie Foord (4.00) not picked Luke Killeen (3.95) protected by Oxford Kinda strange reading, the 3 weakest "rising stars" were all protected by their clubs, would the clubs have been better off trying for someone stronger? Killeen is obviously very promising but he's actually got a lower average than 5 riders not signed as a RS. Going by the publicised rules I think, "why wouldn't they have gone for Jenkins" as he's in their Championship team. Someone will no doubt say "rider's ride where they want" although I read Ipswich comment they "had to wait" to see if someone else picked Jenkins first! I'm sure I read Luke Harrison say he wasn't ready for an RS berth, which is interesting as he has a higher average than two riders who do. Not saying I disagree with him, he has plenty of time to step up. Nathan Ablitt's is a strange situation, not considered good enough to be a RS, yet his average was too high to be Sheffield's number 6. How can you be too good to be a number 6, but not strong enough to be a number 7? Same situation with Gilkes last year, could ride at 7 but not 6 for Sheffield (Edwards needed to be at 6). Anyway the list shows there should be good quality replacements if guests are needed this year.1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
Spreaking as I find: to be fair it was printed in the week afore's ish that current mag, w/e 28-12-24, would be on sale from Friday onwards, 'subbed' issues delivered 24 hours later. Sadly I've had the odd 'Star go missing myself, but whenever I've phoned Dave Fairbrother (a man of few words who gets things done) at Pinegen, 'Star Distibution dept., he has always posted me a replacement asap. During one 'Dude, where's my Star ?' (see what I did) chat he was also frustrated over copies going missing, and revealed the problem is much less prevelant than at one time. Speedway Star remains a top quality publication covering our great sport and, as I've alluded to before, it's important we support the magazine, and our teams / tracks, as without drawing pictures, speedway needs all the support it can get. And, no, Dave didn't ask me to say that, though I promised I would....1 point
-
1 point
-
0 points