There is no reason to get rid of James, he is doing his job. I did have reservations about Sundstrom and our Polish reserve before the season started and didn't understand why we seemed to try so hard to get Sundstrom who hasn't ridden here for years and get rid of a proven consistent points scorer that always gives his best.
I rang Buster and told him I couldn't make it tonight and if there is a chance of a rain off as I don't want to waste my refund on last seasons double header on fuel, he said no worries!
Kurtz was good last night so that is a positive, Shanes did as expected, Linus had a better meeting but Hans would have scored double figures and I still don't understand why some still think it was the right decision to let him go. Don't what is wrong with the poles but hopefully they will come good.
I seem to remember Sundstrom going quite well at Monmore but he isn't riding well, Shanes is good there sometimes but we miss Hans at tracks like Monmore.
Yes but I always backed him because I wanted him to win anyway just like I did when I back Lindback at Cardiff. Just a bit of fun to me I am not a serious gambler.
I think some of the reasons for the changes weren't always just to do with averages either although Howarth was and he was probably a victim of the circumstances at the time. Most Poole fans would like Newman back but there are personal issues and I think that at the time it was probably thought Jack Holder had more potential than Adam but we all make mistakes even Matt ford.
As far as James Shanes goes I think he has done his job, I am sure he will improve and he fights for every point which is why he is liked so much by most Poole fans. If he could gate more consistently then that would help too.