stevebrum

typical trolling bring Tai up and saying how Wolves don't get as big a crowd as Peterborough. Expected trolling retort. As I said if you want to know who PK has invited why don't you ask him? I'm not on his testimonial committee team.

It will get a bigger crowd. Only a troll would suggest otherwise. Doesn't matter where it was hosted. Why don't you ask PK if he has invited him. It doesn't for him or anyone tho?

That's fair, likewise it's not fair to suggest a rider with a lower average is the better rider. Howarth has been a small improver most seasons, time will tell if that continues this season and if Auty has a better season also.

Stats aren't dressing anything up tho are they? If he is a better rider how come not only is his PL average lower but so is was his EL average in 2016. Stats prove Howarth had a better year than Auty. Not sure what riding at number one proves. Didn't Ulamek then Hougaard ride at number one for Leicester last year. That make them better riders who didn't ride number one? Flawed theory IMHO. You are right let's see how this season goes. Evidence suggests Howarth is improving and Auty is on the decline. As both are British I hope they both have a great year!

Don't think there is. If you are a Panthers or Cov fan you will probably go Peterborough. PK will still attract a bigger audience I reckon.

And last year's averages tell it all. Howarth ahead in the PL. 7.18 to 7.01. Howarth was in the team that finished runners up. Howarth ahead in the EL. 5.13 to 4.90. Howarth was in the team that won the league. Stats don't lie.

The year they won the league I believe as well. Glad my stats back up my theory anyway.

But all too predictable. Just waiting for the we are all anti Poole and get back to your own thread line.

no wonder Scunthorpe have had such a poor couple of seasons. Howarth ahead in the PL. 7.18 to 7.01. Howarth was in the team that finished runners up. Howarth ahead in the EL. 5.13 to 4.90. Howarth was in the team that won the league. How many did he miss in 2015? I agree Poles are a risk.

you rate Auty but not Howarth, surprisingly. Howarth is better in both leagues. yep, 5.51 X 1.4. Yet they used Wozniak for 2 seasons! Most Poles are a risk on any day race track given the dictatorship of their governing body. Just to add I was very impressed with him last season, particularly his efforts in Sweden. Could be a great signing for the lions.

Exactly. Most of the championship teams will have found the converted average too off putting. So all Brits were available for both leagues.

Plymouth dropped out, Berwick had a take over after plenty of uncertainty. Workington concerned about crowd levels. British Speedway has problems, not any 1 league.

Tai technically only missed one complete season which would be the same as Milik so i agree. But he still needs to be subjected to the 1.4 conversion so would be 7.94. 5.67 X 1.4 = 7.94

6th in the world in 2010.

Good news regards signings being announced. Nilsson should be a decent start.

KK is competent on any track. It's always down to if he can be bothered. Rarely had a great meeting at Wolves.

I will make a prediction when all teams are announced.

And you certainly are not.

KEITH Chapman is a credit to the sport.

That IS their PL averages!

NL is priced at that sort of price. If people want to pay that sort of price to watch speedway they can. Prices go up, never down.

No biggie. The words of others who read and were disgusted by the comment you or Admin removed tells me all I need to know. Thankfully you aren't continuing trying to defend your use as an example of a TV programme about people with special needs at least.

Or not in this instant. Never mind.

Good luck with not getting called out again tho. And hopefully you won't use a programme about people with special needs as a form of mockery in the future also. Hopefully we can now get our Wolves thread back, fingers crossed for normality to return.

As I said you haven't seen the programme. The people who 'struggle to get dates' all have special needs. That's the basis of the programme. Try watching it or reading about it before you get things wrong again. So I ask again why are you using a TV programme about people with special needs who are "undateable" in comparison to me on a forum. If you would like to admit you misunderstood what the programme was about then you might save a little face. Even so, using your logic why compare me to someone who apparently is undateable?? The relevance or just a cheap snide comment. Take your pick. I don't have a fake fb account or forum account so no I have no reason to lie, why would I? But to describe ANYONE'S wife as ugly is despicable anyway. But I'm not surprised that is what you claimed. Have no idea which fb account you are referring too as I only have one. The content of which is nothing to do with you anyway.