Arson fire

yeah, but not really fair is it.Surely at the yearly pi55 up they could devise a formula for all to participate and at least have a change, same for the pairs.

Never met a fan yet who is against the 4s qualifiers.... They are always well supported, but when have they ever listened to the fans? It's pathetic that one of the big events is contested without a few teams, not even having the chance to qualify.

you sure you're real name ain't Arthur Pringle?

god knows how they'd cope with the pressure and work load of a proper job

Some promotions call meetings off at the drop of a hat aswell, someone just has to spit on a track and they call it off if they are riders short.... Also far too many tracks call meetings off because of a forecast, only to find the forecast is wrong... Yes I know it costs them a few quid, but shouldn't any decent business legislate for these things when doing their budgets??

Where Edinburgh fined for not holding the final play off match a few year ago??..... Or was that a ' managment ' commitee decision

Happy birthday Ryan.

I would reply but it would just be an 'average' response.

so you don't know then

not blaming anyone and understand the time restrictions.... the track was fine, there should be no reason not to complete a match, it's wrong IMO and shouldn't be allowed, just to benefit the home side because they are chasing points before the cut off.... Yes the meeting was decided, but is that really the point??.... Had Glasgow been a point up, there's no way it would have been abandoned, end of.

oh god didn't realize was that bad... Hope he's ok

This is as bad as the belle vue v Poole fiasco... Deary me....

the way the 3-3 heat draws were reeled off it maybe pre concieved...is it legal though?? And it gives worky an unfair advantage...harsh I know, but surely we can't make it u as we go along.... Can we?? Lol

How the hell can you abandon a meeting to fit another one in??.... That can't be right??..This sport is staggeringly staggering lol

They are factual examples of strange decisions.... See little man syndrome is still rearing it's ugly head with you Btw I didn't mention the teams as a bias I was more on about the strange decisions he is head of the said commitee, a commitee that constantly makes different decisions/ outcomes for the same scenarios.... The buck stops at the top IMO.... But you're right who decides that Lemo gets a facility for being at the World Cup??.... Who decides the same tracks get the same meetings each year etc...how Scunny get a facility for klindt as it was a re arranged fixture, but newcastle didn't for lindgren v Berwick in the re arranged sky match... Be interesting to know really.

He is the figure head that's why.... And I assume very instrumental in the goings on and direction of the managment commitee?? Of whom it's obvious some have more say than others....Least you recognise ' they' are full of self interest. Be interesting to know who decides things like blocking certain team changes with in the rules, granting a facility for one team but denying for another in re arranged matches, deciding for eg Brady Kurtz was a 3 then a 5... When he should have been a 7??.... The Dennis Anderson farce of Poole getting him on a 4 point average ... The list goes on. Harkess pulled stunts like burger gate, so it just goes to show how stupid the sport he is figure head of is really.

He comes up with Wor lad nowadays

i propose Starman

or get a bye to the final in the group stages of the play offs like scunny did

It's a farce, if the rains come newcastle could qualify having rode or completed more matches, then again our extra matches have been against 2 of the top 3 in Edinburgh and Berwick.... Don't see the logic in picking 2 teams to race against again, but this is speedway lol.

dear me... What a joke!!

Ta

He injured??

Rose has tweeted his season is pretty much over.

How do scunny get a facility for NK because it's a rearranged meeting?? Newcastle had to use McKinna in the rearranged sky fixture last year as he was riding in Sweden... Has the rule changed??