dontforgetthefueltapsbruv

unless we already have 45 by then to ensure it doesnt matter.

I had an issue early season (using samsung phone) There was a malicious advert trying to take over control. It would freeze the site and could not be closed without powering off phone. Inconvenient but no real problem so long as dont open it. Was called harbwire so beware.

Journalistic headline - Big Ben. Perhaps it will be ..... The bell tolls for Kerr as Big Ben returns... All the best to Lewis btw - although a little disappointing he has not been anywhere near a disaster. As much a numbers game as to why he is the one IMO. Im sure he will be somewhere else soon and notch a big score on his next Foxhall visit!

Big Bjerre???

only if you are 10 sweets behind!!

replace days with weeks months or seasons and would still make sense unfortunately!

54 -38

All heat winners to do a twirl lets hope for a good win to give us a boost All heat winners to do a twirl lets hope for a good win to give us a boost edit seems my phone managed a twix post

Save me some milk bottles for Thursday... ....although if I skip dessert and feign a headache I could just make it!!!!

asset of KL so EL gets priority unless agreed between the two teams differently.We would get a guest for Lewis under this years rules.

absolutely - the pussycats have not broken any rules with their various dealings (this year and last) I am anti poor rules not anti Boro (honest!!)

so why have a protected heat that a rider may not be in?Perhaps Perry should now have to ride at 5 to make sure he is in heat 4. wink

I think he can ride pretty much anything if he wants to. Wolves was one he struggled a little with as I recall but quite why is a mystery.

So again an 'old' average is used to allow the Pussycats even further over the limit by the time the team takes to the track..... thats what was intimated on the Scuuny thread when he was dropped.

How about a Gollob swansong as well???

To Kings Lynn if anywhere apparently.... And he will get a 'protected' heat 4

Congratulations.......

bluff, double bluff and triple bluff?? dont think it was meant as a dig at Bloomy per se. Look at Maccas previous connection you may see why he had a dig at Sigalos.....

because the pussycats team total is actually 44.5+ due to making the changes between the dates of Perry gaining a 5.5+ ave instead of his 3 and it becoming effective.A nuance of the rules - perhaps its one Buster plans to change.... Personally Im not fussed if we make 0 1 or 7 changes and not really bothered if we lose a few more in the rest of 2016 - what I do want is to be entertained in return for my money. That has has been the real disappointement for me this year over and above any results.

an art indeed...... the art of cheating...... a Pussycat speciality??? wink

Id guess the Pusstcats have gained far more from this over the years than they have lost.... Get a proper bloody kerb (it should be compulsory IMO) and it couldnt happen. Think this week shows that when it matters the result was rather predictable......

All the pressure on the Pussycats - its theirs to lose Best I expect is for Witches to sneek a point but a real hammering just as likely. Hope its a cracker whatever the result.

Just to show Im even handed.... Stokes guest count .....1. wink

55- 37 - Panthers wont be caught out early doors two weeks running.

See Mick has joined in and is no longer the 'odd one out'. But with have a 'conundrum' and 'the chase' is on for a new topic to give us all the 'runaround'. Can we succeed in this 'treasure hunt' Without a new topic we will be in 'jeapardy' of slipping off page 1 - 'you have to be in it to win it' The last few days show is doesnt just have to be 'a question of sport'