Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

dontforgetthefueltapsbruv

Members
  • Posts

    17,547
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    65

Everything posted by dontforgetthefueltapsbruv

  1. Good work agent Morris!! You done the Witches fans proud!! Hard luck pussycats!!
  2. but there is no timescale mentioned just that they 'have ridden as an amatuer ' So 1st meeting with no pay and they have fullfilled the criteria
  3. Fair enough June - but as yet we have not had the benefit of forming our own opinions. Thanks for letting us which one we are allowed to have though! wink
  4. Jenga - my post you quoted is not about Rohan. I have accepted his ban a moved on - as have the majority of Witches fans. The SCB found against him and acted accordingly. My post was in response to Outsiders claim that had it been the other way round he wouldnt withhold the footage. So I simply asked IF there was any of the Wilko incident and if so would he please post it. Im happy to take his word if there is none.
  5. So - Outsider Did you record all 15 heats and slow down laps? Do you have footage of 'Wilkogate'? Will you post it?
  6. Independent does not mean a 40% crossover. And by definition if 40% of the SCB are the BSPA it cannot act without interference. Nothing unfounded in any of that.
  7. How can it be independent and run without interference when it has multiple common members with the BSPA?? Even with the best will in the world despite the obvious good intentions of the statement you have posted it just isn't possible IMO. Utter tripe!!
  8. what else can you expect when you are mankey old pussycats!
  9. Although in essence there is little or no difference between the BSPA as a collective, the MC as a subsection of the BSPA and the SCB as the BSPA wolf in sheep's clothing. Whilst technically separate and with different spans of control there is no significant disconnect between all three when it comes to the day to day running of the sport.
  10. spoilsport!! You havent even let us have 24 hours of tongue in cheek conspiracy theories re the 13th!!
  11. but two are at home and we always lose them so nothing lost for those......though one is Worky so lets have the sun out for that one - even we should beat them. wink
  12. yes but we are all joking (hopefully!!) that suddenly there may be a MC decree insisting it is brought forward!All in the best interests of British Speedway of course!!
  13. Actually IMO thats probably how it should be viewed - a bit of theatre for the crowd is what the sport needs. Far to often now all things in life are 'sanitised' to appease very dull people with no sense of expression!! However thats not what the rulebook says and whilst officials can pick and choose which parts to apply there will always be issues.
  14. Rohans ban is 21 days from today. Ends Thursday 13th (blank home date in fixtures anyway!!) So its tick tick tock from now.....
  15. No - the regs were altered to specifically state any ream issues had to be raised and sorted before the meeting.The aim was to avoid results having to be changed. So there can be no appeal - at least not a successful one as is seen by the Kus r/r decision.
  16. So another complete balls up from the BSPA over a team line up! Simply not good enough and needs to be sorted for the future.
  17. Will be interesting to see how long Wilkos ban will be..... And Lunnas mechanic..... And what action is taken for fans entering the racing arena during a meeting...... And despite my saying you should make a stand there is the sit in which is likely to attract attention. Coventry took a stand which most agreed with but still were punished....
  18. Actually disagree with that Superblue - if you genuinely feel so strongly I think you should make a stand even it it is outside normal acceptable means.
  19. Good win for the Tigers - just about deserved it. Ultimately they were more consistent. Too many last places again for the Witches. No Stefan and the lack of a PL guest cost us too. Back to square one!
  20. must admit the same thought had crossed my mind.Hadnt posted it though as felt it may be misinterpreted as a wind up.
  21. I havent said thats what happened it was just to hypothesise.... Lets face it theres been plenty of 'jackanory' from both sides about this and the other incidents from this one! Wilko may well be relieved as his incident has largely slipoed under the radar... Another conundrum - is a failed attack that is subsequently over shadowed by other events unfolding better or worse than a 'successful' attempt with no intent? Any video of that by the way?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy