dontforgetthefueltapsbruv

But it wasnt clearly and that's the problem. Often a regulations CLEARLY have a particular intention but generally you find a team or 2 twisting it in a literal sense for an advantage If it is then changed to stop a manipulation it invariably means it then affects another rider the original intent didn't mean to exclude People often want black and white but then still expect to be able to add their own subjective view

Amazing as ever I'm sure it's like the swan on a pond which looks serene and beautiful above the surface but no doubt paddling furiously under the water

What just any U21? If so last year Kings Lynn could've effectively built to 50 points with GP rider Robert Lambert at 7 .... Is that really what you want?

and then produce the list of his top 20 riders....

Please please please not Kurtz or Holder

Just a little joke - there would be no vote As you you say only 7 teams so desperate times and even Poole are welcomed by everyone

If the CL say no do they have to then get permission to come back to the PL Could be an interesting vote.....

November til March is the best time to have him now. April til October he is bang average with just the all too few WOW moments

Cant see any Witches side containing Cook or Schlein.....

That seems about right now

I'd say that makes him a six

No non British rider can have an average less than 4

A severely flawed plan IMO - doesnt solve the doubling up problem and just makes manipulation by top flight clubs making changes more of a possibility

All sorts of relatively simple solutions but out of the grasp of those making the decisions I'd expect - also too many struggle with the most simplistic of calculations for the current averages as it is!!

It is a different issue because the conversion example you used isnt the regulatory rate - until it is then it is a different issue I did say that I agreed the ratio you stated was more realistic in terms of the real world difference and therefore would be a better position to use I also believe it would be relatively straightforward to use that realistic conversion rate as well as using results from both leagues for those doubling up so that every rider only ever has one average (at least for team building/changes purposes)

I tend to agree but I think you need to find some way of building in a fair and realistic differential

That's a different issue - ie is the conversion rate correct I'd say the figures you quote are quite possibly a more accurate reflection if how things should be rather than the actual conversion in the regs It surely wouldn't be too hard to work out an average average using performances from both leagues where applicable

But then you would have the like of Doyle Fricke and Lambert all assessed at 12 for team building when quite obviously Doyle is head and shoulders above

Could depend also whether who ever made the decision went to the Ian Thomas/John Berry school of measurement

But they would both be about 70 miles apart I thought the distance quoted was 35 miles where a promotion can claim 'protection of interests' and object to another club (full stop and not just sharing a race night)

Isnt it just because he is a pace or two in front of the others? Get some perspective people!

Was a generic comment and not aimed at you specifically Les - apologies if it came across that way I've lost count of the number of posts around heat 15 not being included/45 points needed to draw so should be limit etc

Agree but I cant see any way Iversens half dozen or so meetings put him at No3 !!

That's exactly what was predicted when certain team threads were started. Thankfully another thread by a real home fan was started in each case

Damn auto correct ! Although perhaps my phone knew where I thought Jack could stick it