orion

Who would you have gone for who would scored more than the 4 riders who took the rides ?

No offence Phil but you have a 100 % record of being wrong ..the only person who gives worst info out is here

12 to much for Wolves with the ts etc ...expect Harris or such like to in Poole side on Monday ...lindback and Buck will no doubt not be able to ride on Monday

He's wrong thou ..if was just had 4 riders going round a track even if the race was good no one would go ....without rules league's etc speedway means nothing .

Yea both are stupid and mickey mouse

I doubt it ...substitutions being allowed to used by one team because they are losing are part and Parcel nowhere bar in speedway ...how can that feel right ...not sure why people keep making excuses for what was a stupid and unfair rule .

Spot on .. the very least could expect is for him to explain how they got to 7 . The chapman era is just like it always has been .

Play offs have always been about money ...without money there is no speedway

I think most people like what the grew up with . as .I said Before White Knight had it correct any form of tac sub is stupid ..the problem you got is when you a couple of old timers trying to make out it was somehow fair ...the moment they do that then opinion about can only be classed as living in the past

I think it's impossible to explain it to him ....Poole would not be able to ride on certain nights of the week just like most of the clubs in the uk ,..I think everyone understand that bar one person .

Spot on it's miles down the list ..and we know the old tac sub was just as stupid and more unfair ...just imagine in another sport the only team being allowed to used subs are team that are losing ..but you still got fans who somehow class that as serious

I would say any rule that allowed one team to used subs when the other team can't is stupid . but I forgot because it was in the old days it was ok and fair .

No one on here has to tell you ..everyone knows what you want ..to go back to rules from the old days ...I think it's about 100th time you told us why you don't go anymore ... as people have said go and find something you like .

First of all Boro would have claw back a lot more points under the old tac sub rule ...as we know you have always been favour of that rule so that does not suggest you want a serious sport it suggests that you only care about sticking to old rules no matter what ..the facts are quite clear the old tac sub brought false results than the new rule ever has . Yet again your not giving all the facts ...When the teams first meant over Two legs Belle Vue had won the Bonus point so not really a shock that a team that was super strong at home and had beaten this team by 12 points in the first match as well as being in the Ko final went on to beat reading and claim the bonus point ...as I said all ever do is go on about the days and want old rules back ...if care that much about a serious sport you would not have gone when the old tac sub rule was in place or when riders were all paying each other to drop points to each other ...but somehow you did .

There not allowed to ride on Wednesday at the stadium ...how thick are you ?

If only you had a brain to tick .

No farce at all ..it does matter how you get there the rules are quite clear ...it's a level playing field now

Why would they help him with all these other rules that have gone in Poole favour over the years ..it's the question that keeps being asked ...no one can figure out why this keep's happening

I told you already that lakeside would find it hard to get a guest ...that's why it will be a easy victory over the two legs for Belle vue ..hope it's sunk in now

More rubbish and made up stuff ..how do make out that Reading taking on a in form Swindon was a easier semi final ? Belle Vue finished a close up 5th that year with a great home record and were also were the bookies fav to win that night ..I remember because I backed Belle vue who were -8 to win .. so no reason or shock that Belle vue won that night . I might be wrong but also think they beat reading in the first match at Belle vue as well As for the ts under the old rules Boro would not doubt have scored more than the six extra points they did with the old tac sub rule in place ...it's same the old story a old speedway fan who does not care about logic or reason or the good of the sport but just wants the rules to go back in time to when he went

Not sure why the league always gets the blame . The botton line evis that the lions have been run poorly. I always thought if you are ran well you can do well .far to much blaming other people in speedway

Still time For Lindback to miss the second leg and get Harris in

So he has never has a average of 6.34 then ? thanks for clearing that up

Poole by 20 ish

Lindback would never rode for anyone else as his average would not had been 7 for anyone else