Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Gavan

Members
  • Posts

    9,153
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    20

Everything posted by Gavan

  1. Thats what you call a nice unbiased match report Would be good if you did them to be honest rather than the crap we have to endure from Shovlar
  2. For someone who wins quizzes not very good when he cant spell riders names and doesnt know what country they come from lol
  3. Do you understand the term hindsight at all? You are so thick its unreal now do everyone a favour and bore off
  4. go boil your head, everyone is sick to the back teeth of you and your daft stupid comments. you dont even go to speedway so how can you make any sort of valid comment is beyond me. But Jonny is glad his son left Poole (another brit thrown on the scrapheap by Poole) when you have morons like you as fans
  5. Ah bless you little man Once again you make an inaccurate statement about something I’ve said. You are then put right by a couple of people including a decent Poole fan and then you come back on with another little dig. When you have been made to look foolish surely it’s best for you to say nothing at all. Now run along must be past your bedtime
  6. And still one idiot keeps saying I said Morris is better than Kurtz when I never have said that once Good job Rayc a decent fan backed me up
  7. Never read a truer post Fact is it’s only morons like Shovlar and 1 or 2 others who are the issue most of the Poole fans are decent enough
  8. You really are thick as rubbish. Never said Morris is a better rider than Kurtz I said Morris in the top league last season averaged better than Kurtz..... that’s quite clearly a fact you can’t disagree with. But as usual you twist a post to suit your usual crap you post. I doubt very much Belle Vue will worry about going back to Poole with a full 1-7
  9. So the usual Poole numpties still think Poole would have won that match if Cook and Worrall rode!!! Showa I guess a huge lack of knowledge of the sport. Cook and Worrall would have needed 6 each for Belle Vue to win something they would have done very easily
  10. Lol thick or trolling again. So Belle Vue won’t have a better chance lol deluded. Cook and Worrall 26 at Poole last time and their replacements got 4! What warped planet you on
  11. And that match report never fails to make you laugh! Poole would have lost if Cook and Worrall had of rode simple as that.
  12. He does. Couldn’t beat Kurtz and beat Kildemand when he missed the start. Sundstrom beat him so he really only beat an out of sorts Josh G. Fricke did what was expected. Just a shame Belle Vue were severely weakened tonight but that’s not Pooles fault
  13. The poles did there job that’s what you would get from them about 6 a meeting. Poole can only beat what’s in front of them and a Belle Vue with no Cook and Worrall plus Holder missing proved a huge advantage for Poole. Belle Vue did well to keep it to 10 and shouldn’t have any fears going back to Poole with a full 1-7.
  14. Agreed 4 points from 8 rides so far from their replacements. Fair to say that Cook and Worrall would be on at least 12 and Belle Vue in front. Still at least this meeting fell at the right time for Poole against a much weakened Belle Vue side
  15. Love on updates that Kurtz looks class hasn’t exactly got much to beat! As expected Belle Vue finding it to tough without there best 2 riders but Poole struggling to see them off. Apparently the track is awful but benefit of the doubt with the weather
  16. Agreed We are regularly told how amazing this Poole 1-7 are this season. So last season Poole 53-40 (Worrall 16 & Cook 10) with that poor Poole team , means that surely with the 2 top Belle Vue riders missing it should be a 20 point win.
  17. I agree with you. Cook last 4 visits to Poole 10, 14, 11, 12 Batchelor as a visiting rider 7, 4 and 1 The loss of the current British 1 and 2 (apart from Tai) weakens Belle Vue hugely and this has to be a 20 point win for Poole
  18. I found his performance a bit baffling, expected him to possibly win the meeting with the exception of Drabik. Maybe he had bike issues or something
  19. Should be a comfortable home win between 15-20 points. Lawson a half decent guest for Worrall but with the fact that Fricke struggles there and Cook having a few issues it should be an easy meeting for the Pirates
  20. Its big news. Seriously is anyone even bothered what Muddlo is up to lol
  21. ???? Again where on earth do you get your weird opinions from? The only 3 Brits who would be good enough for a pairs meeting would be Woffy, Cook and Worrall. Or do you think the likes of Harris, Nicholls and King should be in? Maybe Schlein then? You really only ever post tripe to get reactions pretty sad dont you think. Maybe Poole could have a Brit capable but we know what Poole do with young British talent
  22. I dont have an issue with you just the usual Poole fan that the vast majority on here have an issue with
  23. Please tell me what you base your opinions on please? I look how riders go at the track they are due to race on and use previous form as a guide to how they are likely to perform. Not once have i said he would have got 16 again...............but he is more likely to get 8 or more than 5 or less. Maybe when i look at horse racing i shouldnt bother wether a horse acts at a stiff track like Cheltenham or Towcester or a flat track like Kempton or what sort of going they prefer fast or soft...........i mean how silly of me to use previous form as a guide. Must remember to never back Rafeal Nadal on clay... i mean he was good on it but he isnt likely to do it again. As i said i look at stats because it helps to form an opinion. Worrall is better at Poole than Fricke, Tungate, Starke and Bewley, therefore i would use that as my opinion to say that without him they would be weaker if those 4 took his rides. So come on what do you use to decide what team might win? Im pretty sure that when Poole go to Wolves we will all hear how poor Holder is there which is correct, but i guess thats ok to say that
  24. lol shut up troll my argument is this.................WORRALL IS BETTER THAN R/R. Can you answer that? No.......your such a troll you just change the thread to try and suit your agenda. You said R/R would score more than Worrall............something that NOBODY agreed with. Moron
  25. Is it? I had no idea? Have a read of the thread buddy then comment thanks for your useless input
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy