Gavan

Love on updates that Kurtz looks class hasn’t exactly got much to beat! As expected Belle Vue finding it to tough without there best 2 riders but Poole struggling to see them off. Apparently the track is awful but benefit of the doubt with the weather

Agreed We are regularly told how amazing this Poole 1-7 are this season. So last season Poole 53-40 (Worrall 16 & Cook 10) with that poor Poole team , means that surely with the 2 top Belle Vue riders missing it should be a 20 point win.

I agree with you. Cook last 4 visits to Poole 10, 14, 11, 12 Batchelor as a visiting rider 7, 4 and 1 The loss of the current British 1 and 2 (apart from Tai) weakens Belle Vue hugely and this has to be a 20 point win for Poole

I found his performance a bit baffling, expected him to possibly win the meeting with the exception of Drabik. Maybe he had bike issues or something

Should be a comfortable home win between 15-20 points. Lawson a half decent guest for Worrall but with the fact that Fricke struggles there and Cook having a few issues it should be an easy meeting for the Pirates

Its big news. Seriously is anyone even bothered what Muddlo is up to lol

???? Again where on earth do you get your weird opinions from? The only 3 Brits who would be good enough for a pairs meeting would be Woffy, Cook and Worrall. Or do you think the likes of Harris, Nicholls and King should be in? Maybe Schlein then? You really only ever post tripe to get reactions pretty sad dont you think. Maybe Poole could have a Brit capable but we know what Poole do with young British talent

I dont have an issue with you just the usual Poole fan that the vast majority on here have an issue with

Please tell me what you base your opinions on please? I look how riders go at the track they are due to race on and use previous form as a guide to how they are likely to perform. Not once have i said he would have got 16 again...............but he is more likely to get 8 or more than 5 or less. Maybe when i look at horse racing i shouldnt bother wether a horse acts at a stiff track like Cheltenham or Towcester or a flat track like Kempton or what sort of going they prefer fast or soft...........i mean how silly of me to use previous form as a guide. Must remember to never back Rafeal Nadal on clay... i mean he was good on it but he isnt likely to do it again. As i said i look at stats because it helps to form an opinion. Worrall is better at Poole than Fricke, Tungate, Starke and Bewley, therefore i would use that as my opinion to say that without him they would be weaker if those 4 took his rides. So come on what do you use to decide what team might win? Im pretty sure that when Poole go to Wolves we will all hear how poor Holder is there which is correct, but i guess thats ok to say that

lol shut up troll my argument is this.................WORRALL IS BETTER THAN R/R. Can you answer that? No.......your such a troll you just change the thread to try and suit your agenda. You said R/R would score more than Worrall............something that NOBODY agreed with. Moron

Is it? I had no idea? Have a read of the thread buddy then comment thanks for your useless input

Lol unreal I know it is now Lawson and i said that is a good choice of guest. If you honestly think that r/r would have made Belle Vue stronger than im afraid you have very limited knowledge. You do the same every season........go on and on about how good Poole are pre season........as soon as they have a match the opposition are always somehow strengthened in your very weird opinion Poole to win this at a canter by at least 10 maybe up to 15

So we are now taking his scores from 2015 when he was a reserve and is now a vastly improved rider. The facts are plain and simple and just for the people that are totally missing the point: R/R FOR STEVE WORRALL WOULD MAKE BELLE VUE WEAKER!!!

Thats good then so the next time Poole book a guest will they book a rider who goes well at a track or poor? Of course previous form at a track is a guide numpty

Its like dealing with dumb and dumber here. Ok lets look at this how any normal human would look at it. Steve Worrall goes well at Poole, certain riders like Max Fricke dont When looking at making a prediction of a meeting guess what.....i look at how a rider does at that track. If you think that a rider who goes well at a certain track can be replaced by 4 riders who dont go as well and it makes a team stronger you are deluded. Are Belle Vue stronger with Worrall then r/r? Yes quite clearly to those whose sole objective isnt to troll If you care to read my post i said Lawson is a good choice of guest but i guess you gloss over that Would Poole miss Kurtz or Kildemand and have r/r and be stronger lol

4 from 4 including a bonus win and and engine failure 8 from 4 Pretty conclusive he goes ok round there. 2 points in every race on average. Would the r/r get that? Doubtful and quite likely he may have had the heat 15 ride as well Your kind of missing the point so no need going over old ground.

What on earth are you wittering on about lol Shovlar is a wind up merchant and a troll, if thats how he gets his kicks then so be it. Wonder why everyone has a pop at him lol are we all wrong? And hell yes i will use statistics surely thats what we can base predictions on is it not?? Would you pick a rider that got 16 last time or a rider who got 5?? Im not saying that Steve would have got 16 but he certainly has the form in the book to go very well at Poole. Maybe when predicting a meeting we should ignore a riders past performances at tracks then? As ive just said Lawson is a good replacement based on his last visit .....................oh damn maybe i shouldnt have done that and used his past Poole record as a guide to wether he may score 10 or 4.

Good choice 12 from 5 last time out and certainly stronger then going r/r for Worrall.

I do know that riders dont always get the same Would you rather have a GB international who scored 16 last time or have his rides taken by 3 lesser riders and one who although better hates the track?? Come on its not rocket science is it. All Shovlar does is stir the pot looking for reactions

They may go r/r but the loss of Worrall is huge

Nothing to do with ranting Just dealing with one troll in yourself who for whatever reason always has to have an opinion that is so wildly different from anyone elses. If you think a rider who scored 16 last time can be easily replaced by lesser riders then you really are quite a simpleton. Yes Shanes got a maximum against Wolves, so the next time you rode Wolves would you rather have Shanes or someone else?? Not rocket science. Do everyone a favour and bore off

I remind you again 16 points last time!! Fricke is a better rider than Worrall but not round Poole isnt hard to work out.......well it seems to be with you. If you can find 1 person on here who agrees with you that Belle Vue are stronger without Worrall then i will be amazed

Steve Worrall got 16 last time at Poole yet you dont think he will be missed lol. Your nothing but a joke and a troll simple as. Just for the record in that same meeting Starke got a whopping 3 and Bewley only 1 yet you think they will cover a rider who get 16 last time!! When you have something to say that makes any sense let us know. EVERYONE has said Belle Vue are weaker without Worrall , Poole fans included, so are you thick or a troll??

Has anyone said that? I think Poole will struggle at Wolves but Poole are favourites to win at Leicester. If Poole lose this it will be a shock

You really are either thick or trolling. Fricke hates the place, Tungate started the season slowly, Starke and Bewley not in the same class as Worrall Do everyone a favour and dont comment if all you can do is troll. Everyone knows Belle Vue are weaker without Worrall so as i said thick or a troll you decide