RoundTheBoards

In short, Yes. If a team is operating R/R then his rides can be taken by the rider immediately above him in the averages and anyone below. If a rider gets injured during the meeting and they are able to use IRR, then the IRR rides can be taken by anyone with an average below him A rider could therefore take an R/R ride for one rider and also take an IRR ride for the other.

You've got it all confused. The ruling doesn't say "Becker is no longer a Wolves rider". He still is a Wolves ride, still in their 1-7. All that has changed is that Wolves are no longer allowed a facility for him. (for 28 days they had a facility that allowed them to use R/R or a guest up to Becker's average). They now have no facility for any meeting Becker misses, and must follow the "no facility" rule. Becker is still in the 1-7, and can ride any time he's able.

Chris Harris

Should be fined for fielding an understrength team, as used to be the case. Chapman should have to pay 50% of the total points money for the whole match regardless of the score.

Are you predicting rain in Poland tomorrow?

Twisting things that way must drop London right down the list with its approx 8,000 population.

Sorry Woofy, but it falls a long way short of this maserpiece

Has a Premiership team ever used Richie Worrall as a Tac Sub before now?

Think Edinburgh have it right. They have a strong heat 13 and 15. By putting Roynon at 4 he goes into heat 14, guaranteeing them a strong finish in the last 3 heats. Trying to match up rides as you say doesn't work. If they put spooner at 4 hoping to meet Marson, then Belle Vue would just swap their 3 and 4 round to cancel it out. The tactics of positioning 3 and 4 is more about who has the inside gates early on

Actually a rule applying to all 3 leagues.

Does it? They probably mean Kai.

Luke who? The only possible replacement for Josh Embleton is an unattached 3.00 rider

Can't see Kingston wanting to travel from Essex to Berwick for home matches. Ben Rathbone may be a better fit.

If it was true you'd be able to provide the list (that I've asked for twice) of 15+ year old who could fill the MDL with a view to progressing to NDL standard. (You only need 12 riders to staff the 3 teams, which you say isn't enough teams). First you can't provide the list because you're "out of touch with it all". Now you contradict yourself that you have "bitter experience" ... but you still can't provide the list! The fact remains there are only 3 MDL teams because there aren't enough sub-NDL riders around, aged 15+, to fill 3 MDL teams.

That is just completely untrue. If you think it's true, I repeat my challenge for you to name all these riders aged 15+ who could ride in an MDL league aiming to put themselves in the shop window for an NDL place. It's not the case that the rider pool has dried up because there are no MDL teams. The reality is that there are no MDL teams because the rider pool dried up and the people running them couldn't get enough riders to staff them. The British Youth System does a good job with what it has, but there are very few riders even in the youth system, and many of them are several years away from turning 15.

I don't think the question is "Where are new riders expected to learn their trade?" The worrying question is "Where are new riders?" It's all very well saying there should be a MDL of more than 3 teams, but just 3 teams needs 12 riders. Can you name me 12 riders within reach of the Midlands aged 15-21 who would be suitable for this MDL with a chance to progress to the NDL in future? I'll wait....

It's pretty obvious who is telling the truth. On one side we've got a man on his own, claiming in his book (which contains many other errors and "misrememberings") that he didn't write the letters demanding free passes for 100 of his friends. Then on the other side we've got a number of promoters who received the letters, and many more who have seen the letters. These include the late Phil Rising, a fairly impartial journalist and self-confessed Collins fan. Then we've got the vitriolic scrawled message to a dying man who had only tried to help sort out the situation of the 100 free passes. Why would you be so nasty if you hadn't even demanded the 100 passes in the first place? Sorry, but you don't have to be Sherlock Holmes to solve this one.

No it wasn't. In the past averages were based on every league match in the season. They still should. Rolling averages should be based on the number of league matches in a season. 10 is too few to get a fair average.

Just James Pearson, Jacob Hook and George Congreve to start with. Maybe someone will be looking at Jake Turner during the season if they lose a heatleader to injury.

James Pearson signs https://twitter.com/TheAces/status/1634130512951361536

Getting himself match fit ready for Ipswich when the Russian's visa is denied?

In that case I would have thought he would be ok to do NDL, unless he's on some kind of permit/visa for his normal job that won't allow him to do any other work.

Assuming Hook is riding for Armadale (as seems to be the case), I can't think of any reason why MacDonald couldn't do the same and ride NDL on a similar basis. The only thing is without a CL team it's hard to imagine how it would be worth travelling to the other side of the world just to do NDL, and maybe there'd be work permit/visa issues coming over without having a professional job here.

Congreave has British patriality, and (allegedly) so does Dayle Wood. (and Luke Killeen etc) They come in the same as any other British rider on 3.00, unless they have ridden in a National state championship in which case they come in on 4.50 But that's the same as it's always been. Nothing to do with the new rule this year opening the league up to Commonwealth riders.

The only Commonwealth rider we know will be in the NDL is Jacob Hook, and he has a CL average of 4.00 and so will be 8.00 in the NDL. Can't imagine anyone flying in a Commonwealth rider just to ride NDL, so presumably any others would ride in CL too, and just double their CL average for NDL. But if anyone did come over for NDL only I can't imagine them being assessed at anything less than 8.00 anyway.