Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Ipswich 2020


Recommended Posts

22 minutes ago, IronScorpion said:

I have now been looking at the Rules & Regulations & in Match Averages 10.2 it says

"The most recently established MA will be used. If a rider has an established MA in both the Premiership and Championship Leagues, established in the same season, that leagues MA will apply to that league."

From that ruling, his Premiership MA will apply but, having ridden in May, his new 1/6 MA should apply. (strange but are the BSP Ltd/SCB not applying the correct rules. Neil Watson, help me & others out!!!!!!!)

Yes, he would guest (or sign now I’ve read back up the thread!) on his 1/6 Premiership average of 7.82

Edited by NeilWatson
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Baldyman said:

So I take it the Panthers will be putting in a protest. 

 

3 minutes ago, Baldyman said:

So I take it the Panthers will be putting in a protest. 

Protests against team line-ups don’t exist now, any discrepancies are dealt with between Promotions via the team line-up website. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, IronScorpion said:

That is why I posted my previous post as the rules have been twisted, bent & gone round corners. They are said to be using his "old, May Premiership" average but his "recent" Championship average should apply. Either way, Ipswich have re-declared under the limit.

What year's 'old May Premiership' average.....?:rolleyes::D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, NeilWatson said:

Yes, he would guest (or sign now I’ve read back up the thread!) on his 1/6 Premiership average of 7.82

So Ipswich have ballsed up, again, as he can't guest on his average(compared to Heeps) & the re-declaration stated in the Starke signing news puts them over the limit.

Heeps 6.17 Stewart 4.00 remaining points 1.78 = 11.95

Cook 7.82? Starke 4.27 =12.09

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, IronScorpion said:

So Ipswich have ballsed up, again, as he can't guest on his average(compared to Heeps) & the re-declaration stated in the Starke signing news puts them over the limit.

Heeps 6.17 Stewart 4.00 remaining points 1.78 = 11.95

Cook 7.82? Starke 4.27 =12.09

As far as I can see the conversion factor is 1.6 - it was given as that in the 2020 regulations and hasn’t been amended in the 2021 amendments. However Ipswich quoted 4.27 for Starke and I agree that wouldn’t fit 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, KIRKYLANE said:

Pleased that Cook has found a new team.

So am I, despite his problems from time to time, he's still one of the better British riders based in this country.

I was amazed and disappointed to see his departure from King's Lynn, although there might have been very good reasons for that.

Although he's joined our rival club, I hope he does a very good job for Ipswich Speedway, and wish him nothing but the best going forward.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, NeilWatson said:

As far as I can see the conversion factor is 1.6 - it was given as that in the 2020 regulations and hasn’t been amended in the 2021 amendments. However Ipswich quoted 4.27 for Starke and I agree that wouldn’t fit 

Cook is too low or Starke is too high. Either way still fits under the limit... unless Starke is a 4.27 and Cook is higher then..... dejavu

Aren't averages checked and confirmed by the bigwigs before a PR is released? 

 

Edited by 2ndbendbeerhut
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, IronScorpion said:

Supplementary Regulations V2  010.2.3

So the conversion factor is 1.5 confirming Starke at 4.27. The new GSAs will show the declaration and individual averages in due course. My guess is that Cook’s average should be 7.59

Edited by NeilWatson
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, NeilWatson said:

So the conversion factor is 1.5 confirming Starke at 4.27. The new GSAs will show the declaration and individual averages in due course. My guess is that Cook’s average should be 7.59

My guess is 7.89....

Anyone want a go at 50p a guess... winner takes all :rofl:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am only going on the fact that, even though he was replaced after the meeting on the 27th May, that meeting is in his qualifying average when the new averages change on the 1st July so his 1/6 June average should apply.

So Ipswich have applied his old(May Premiership) rather than his recent(1 June Premiership) for Cook whereas they have used a recent(converted June Championship) of 4.27 rather than his old(converted May Championship) of 4.22 for Starke!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, 2ndbendbeerhut said:

My guess is 7.89....

Anyone want a go at 50p a guess... winner takes all :rofl:

 

Here's my 50p :D

Prior to 8th June, Cook's average was 7.59 and became 7.82 from 8th June onwards.

Regulation 010.3 states: Changes must be made at least 72 hours before the start time of the meeting at which it is intended to be used. Given our next meeting is tomorrow, 10th June, that would mean a re-declare on the 7th at the latest, therefore Cook would still have his 7.59 average.

Has my 50p been well spent?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, IronScorpion said:

So Ipswich have ballsed up, again, as he can't guest on his average(compared to Heeps) & the re-declaration stated in the Starke signing news puts them over the limit.

Heeps 6.17 Stewart 4.00 remaining points 1.78 = 11.95

Cook 7.82? Starke 4.27 =12.09

#releasethecook :P

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, ipswichwitches said:

Here's my 50p :D

Prior to 8th June, Cook's average was 7.59 and became 7.82 from 8th June onwards.

Regulation 010.3 states: Changes must be made at least 72 hours before the start time of the meeting at which it is intended to be used. Given our next meeting is tomorrow, 10th June, that would mean a re-declare on the 7th at the latest, therefore Cook would still have his 7.59 average.

Has my 50p been well spent?

Don’t understand why he would have got new average on 8th June, surely should be 1st June and then 1st July. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, ipswichwitches said:

Here's my 50p :D

Prior to 8th June, Cook's average was 7.59 and became 7.82 from 8th June onwards.

Regulation 010.3 states: Changes must be made at least 72 hours before the start time of the meeting at which it is intended to be used. Given our next meeting is tomorrow, 10th June, that would mean a re-declare on the 7th at the latest, therefore Cook would still have his 7.59 average.

Has my 50p been well spent?

No, but here is my 50p:mad:

Cook's initial average prior to all meetings was 7.59. He then rode in "qualifying meetings" up to & including 23rd month, according to the rules, which gives him a new applicable average from 1st June. He then rode on the 27th & was subsequently dropped. His new average should then be applied to any team he races for(even as a guest) until a new average is applied (after all qualifying races up to & including 23rd June) on 1st July.

HE HAS A NEW AVERAGE FROM 1ST JUNE!!!

What on earth has the 8th June got to do with anything with his average?

(:drink::drink::cheers: water of course, in the garden to chill, hopefully)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy