ragdoll64 Posted 13 hours ago Report Share Posted 13 hours ago 13 hours ago, Triple.H. said: With the absences and injuries how would he make the lineup better, he has said poor Oxford lineup so say how he'd improve it. He didn’t say he could……that’s my point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triple.H. Posted 13 hours ago Report Share Posted 13 hours ago 50 minutes ago, ragdoll64 said: He didn’t say he could……that’s my point. Pointless saying it's a poor lineup without offering what he would consider a better one IMO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nickinho Posted 12 hours ago Report Share Posted 12 hours ago 3 minutes ago, Triple.H. said: Pointless saying it's a poor lineup without offering what he would consider a better one IMO. It's a poor line-up but it's likely to be the best they could come up with to cover for the injuries at such short notice. It should be a Monarchs win tonight but improvement has to come from Mitchell Cluff if it is to be a big victory because the bonus points in this league phase will be important. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foreverblue Posted 12 hours ago Report Share Posted 12 hours ago 19 minutes ago, Nickinho said: It's a poor line-up but it's likely to be the best they could come up with to cover for the injuries at such short notice. It should be a Monarchs win tonight but improvement has to come from Mitchell Cluff if it is to be a big victory because the bonus points in this league phase will be important. Cluff should do well but Wood could also get a good score, he seems to have improved this season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
szkocjasid Posted 5 hours ago Report Share Posted 5 hours ago Not a fan of clubs swapping their riding order & ruining fans programmes, don't think it should be allowed (Riss moved from 3 to 2), unless it was a mistake by the Monarchs promotion. After all, every rider gets 4 programmed rides. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
szkocjasid Posted 5 hours ago Report Share Posted 5 hours ago Ludicrous using Rowe as a tac sub in heat 5, meaning Masters won't get one. Masters looked comfortable in heat one, Rowe all over the place in heat 3! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
therefused Posted 5 hours ago Report Share Posted 5 hours ago 2 minutes ago, szkocjasid said: Ludicrous using Rowe as a tac sub in heat 5, meaning Masters won't get one. Masters looked comfortable in heat one, Rowe all over the place in heat 3! You know who the Oxford team manager is right? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
szkocjasid Posted 4 hours ago Report Share Posted 4 hours ago 31 minutes ago, szkocjasid said: Ludicrous using Rowe as a tac sub in heat 5, meaning Masters won't get one. Masters looked comfortable in heat one, Rowe all over the place in heat 3! 28 minutes ago, therefused said: You know who the Oxford team manager is right? Then a brilliant change to give Wood more rides, then an odd decision to give Vale the r/r ride, meaning Wood won't get 7 rides 🤷 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JanAndersen Posted 3 hours ago Report Share Posted 3 hours ago 1 hour ago, szkocjasid said: Then a brilliant change to give Wood more rides, then an odd decision to give Vale the r/r ride, meaning Wood won't get 7 rides 🤷 He did but just not in the way everyone would expect Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JanAndersen Posted 3 hours ago Report Share Posted 3 hours ago Not a great spectacle with the track not up to the usual standards and Oxford very depleted. Kye continues to impress, Sedgy solid because he made the starts. Mitch Cluff’s performance was streets ahead of previous weeks which is great to see. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crescent girl Posted 2 hours ago Report Share Posted 2 hours ago 2 hours ago, szkocjasid said: Ludicrous using Rowe as a tac sub in heat 5, meaning Masters won't get one. Masters looked comfortable in heat one, Rowe all over the place in heat 3! Sorry, Rowe is above Russ in averages, so he is the "one above". Sam can't be a tac sub in that team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fromafar Posted 2 hours ago Report Share Posted 2 hours ago 7 minutes ago, crescent girl said: Sorry, Rowe is above Russ in averages, so he is the "one above". Sam can't be a tac sub in that team. ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JanAndersen Posted 2 hours ago Report Share Posted 2 hours ago (edited) . Edited 2 hours ago by JanAndersen Double post Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tyler42 Posted 1 hour ago Report Share Posted 1 hour ago 4pts from three Oxford riders. Bowtell beat one opposing rider. Morley none. Vale failed to score. Was that the best team Oxford could field? Surely, Simon Lambert would have been a better option if averages were ok. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
szkocjasid Posted 1 hour ago Report Share Posted 1 hour ago 3 hours ago, szkocjasid said: Ludicrous using Rowe as a tac sub in heat 5, meaning Masters won't get one. Masters looked comfortable in heat one, Rowe all over the place in heat 3! 1 hour ago, crescent girl said: Sorry, Rowe is above Riss in averages, so he is the "one above". Sam can't be a tac sub in that team. You're not making any sense, using a tac sub has nothing to do with a rider being eligible for a r/r ride. Masters should've been given a tac sub ride, not Rowe. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
szkocjasid Posted 1 hour ago Report Share Posted 1 hour ago 3 hours ago, szkocjasid said: Then a brilliant change to give Wood more rides, then an odd decision to give Vale the r/r ride, meaning Wood won't get 7 rides 🤷 2 hours ago, JanAndersen said: He did but just not in the way everyone would expect Yeah Schroeck didn't really manage his troops right. Wood getting his 7th ride in heat 25, when that could have been Rowe, while Rowe may not have scored, that would've freed up Wood to replace Morley or Bowtell in one of their rides! Also if Rowe isn't good enough for heat 15, why did he get the tac sub over Masters? Wouldn't affect the match result, but could've been closer for the bonus point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
szkocjasid Posted 1 hour ago Report Share Posted 1 hour ago 2 hours ago, JanAndersen said: Not a great spectacle with the track not up to the usual standards and Oxford very depleted. Kye continues to impress, Sedgy solid because he made the starts. Mitch Cluff’s performance was streets ahead of previous weeks which is great to see. Cluff was very good, quick out of the gate & steady around the track, even if not the fastest. Monarchs really should've given him an extra ride in heat 12, he deserved it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.