All Activity

How did we throw that away. Zach was rubbish all night and got passed by Joe T in heat 14.

Feel for the pirates, few shocking decisions and they end up some how losing on the night. glad all riders appear to have gotten away injury free. Id have gone Kerr over Thompson in heat 15. The form of Zach and Anders is a worry

Vaculik a shoe in for a wildcard imo with the Prague GP being used as the excuse to select him.

Taken from Edinburgh website: "Joining Adam in the team is Dayle Wood - a new name to British Speedway but with experience from Australia. The 28 year-old from Wagga Wagga, New South Wales has raced motorcycles since the age of 6 before transitioning to speedway in 2018 having always watched and loved the sport." https://www.edinburghmonarchs.co.uk/news-centre/article/2023-02-08/roynon-and-wood-join-monarchs-academy

If Poole win this league featuring two riders well past their sell by date then it just proves how weak the Championship has become.

You have lol Plymouth lost a heat leader tonight and there number 1 is missing Plymouth lost Barker early on the other night And Oxford turned up with Scunthorpes number 7 riding at 3 At Ipswich we faced Oxford with no Tungate and and weaker number 4…. We got lucky …. It happens in speedway If you can’t acknowledge that you have had the rub of the green recently I find that a bit strange

Because you said that is 3 meetings in a row we have ridden against a weakened team.

Please read what I wrote …. I said it wasn’t Pooles fault how is that negative it’s fact And yes we faced a weaker Oxford side I’m struggling to see the point you are making

You comment on every Poole meeting and its always in a negative way. Its not like Ipswich raced against a weakened team in their last meeting!

Need Poole track staff to show how to replace fence.

Yes just like Shovlar and Lisa commenting on Ipswich meetings … how dare they

Gavan commenting on a Poole meeting, who would have thought that would happen!

You dont know what would have happened and it was Lasse's fault, Kerr should not have been excluded and he should not have been excluded in his next race either, Tom Soencer just had horrific crash, went over the air fence.

I guess that means if a rider was genuinely ill, but his club couldn't find a similar averaged rider to guest & best option was actually 75% of his average, the club could then say "he's not ill, he just can't be bothered" so he doesn't get a 7 day suspension for a non-speedway injury / illness?

I'm wondering why Barker got the IRR ride in heat 3. In normal circumstances it would be used in heat 12 - to avoid both reserves having to go out together. While Barker win the heat, so it looks like it worked, as Plymouth knew Kerr was excluded from the re-run, I wonder if they would've put Spencer out, guaranteed at least a 3-3 using your weakest rider? As it turns out, with Kerr excluded from heat 12, they've got a guaranteed at least a 3-3 using their weakest rider in that heat anyway.

Lol, don't waste your time mate... I emailed them twice asking which regulation Workington breached that got them a 2 league point deduction, as it's normally stated in their press release, never received a reply!

Don’t think this ref likes Kerr, he’s been excluded twice and done nothing wrong in either of them

Hi Gavin, give it a rest mate. Your obsession with Poole is not only weird but the fact you think thst they always gain advantages from other teams. I don't understand why.

It happened so late on in the match that no-one realised what was happening. I spoke to him in passing in the car park afterwards and I did notice him wearing a bandage or plaster but didn't think anything of it at the time. He was excellent at Armadale.

But not speedway -- only started in late 2022.

Not Pooles fault but that’s 3 meetings in a row now where they have benefited racing against a weakened injured team Plymouth with a fully fit Lasse would be winning this and now struggling is helping Poole hugely in the race for top

Very good meeting today. Batchelor disappointing but I suppose he came through when it mattered. Tate just can't seem to get going at the moment. He's a shadow of his former self. However, I do think the track has been somewhat disappointing of late. There is good racing at times but not a lot of passing.

IMO he dosn't need to do that he is just better than any of the other riders most of the time !

All I know is Kings Lynn will lose

Thanks Arnie Without wishing to be a pedant, I can't see any regulation that provides that, without SCB approval in advance ( under 0.10.5 p) Reg 011.4 c then sets out the reduced facility provision, but, to my mind, that presupposses that a facility is applicable under reg 010.5 in the first place. Is there a diifferent reg number you are thinking of? ( I appreciate that it's not your responsibility to satisfy my curiosity! I might e-mail SCB to ask for its view) If SCB doesn't have to approve in advance what's to stop a rider not going to a track he doesn't like, and for the club to get a 75% reduced facility guest who is a track specialist ( and therefore an improvement on its own rider?)