Bagpuss

Your constant bellyaching and bleating wears the best of us down unfortunately. And as if to prove the point, I've never said nobody is available at all. While the rules allow they are clearly going to strive for replacements as strong as possible even if that involves waiting (Ipswich and Sheffield too) and use lesser riders as guests where necessary. Just common sense.

Precisely. This poster has proved multiple times that he doesn't know his arsehole from his earhole so I wouldn't take too much notice.

There is nothing on the Met Office which is far more reliable. Not that forecasts this far out are particularly accurate anyway. People seem to be forgetting that Lynn can't just call fixtures off without the agreement other parties despite it being said about a million times this last week. They will ride with the best guests available, you just have to get on with it and see what happens. Or perhaps a new signing or two, who knows.

He really wouldn't.

I think you know very well that MPT is way off the level of the two unavailable riders. To be honest I'd have no problem with Lynn being forced to use Palm Toft after 28 days of a facility ie some kind of rider control as I hate guests and R/R but as that doesn't happen then the club are going to do what makes them strongest for each meeting.

Yep. Yet another kick in the teeth.

Not based on his home performances. It was said after our first visit to Sheffield in April that his engines were to strong. Perhaps he went too far the other way last night.

Don't want to moan too much about injuries as everyone suffers them but losing Basso would be a massive blow on top of the other two unavailables, he's really started to look the part in recent weeks.

I think he's just a one track pony unfortunately. Fingers crossed that Ben is ok as he's really been looking the part at Lynn recently.

Lynn have spoken to dozens of riders, they are desperately trying to replace both unavailable team members.

Why would Lynn not want to replace Museilak?

I suspect we've both heard the same thing and will probably never know the truth but if Lynn was being run that badly then I'm struggling to believe that Museilak wouldn't be allowed to race elsewhere. And why the riders who do and have ridden for Buster et al at Lynn and P'boro and keep doing so don't withhold their services too.

Lynn now have 'no facility', which is a 75% guest nowadays.

Of course I'm risking the comeback of 'you would say that' but for me if a rider witholds his services then he shouldn't be allowed to go elsewhere that season. If hes sacked then fair enough, or settles his differences and comes back for his original club but there has clearly been some underhand stuff going on here on the rider's part, however he dresses it up. Don't blame Ipswich for asking but I think the BSPL have decided correctly.

I've seen several Peterborough fans at every Lynn meeting this year so far, so there must be some interest. Probably more than you are prepared to admit. Swaffham and Lynn just wouldn't work, it's a sparsely populated area compared to Wolves and Cradley, like comparing apples and oranges. Would have to be one or the other.