Star Fever 274 Posted September 2, 2017 (edited) Whenever this meeting is re-run (5th or 6th sept?) .....as this is allegedly after the stupid cut-off date, will the points actually count?? If they don't it'd be bloody unfair on Lynn if we need the 3 points to avoid finishing bottom of league and relegation play-off?? Edited September 2, 2017 by Star Fever Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Haza 1,774 Posted September 2, 2017 Whenever this meeting is re-run (5th or 6th sept?) .....as this is allegedly after the stupid cut-off date, will the points actually count?? If they don't it'd be bloody unfair on Lynn if we need the 3 points to avoid finishing bottom of league and relegation play-off?? Buster said it was a play off push when he sacked Holder and Batch - he didn't say which play off - sacking those two and not at least replace them with like for like replacements is without doubt the biggest own goal in speedway history. But hey least we will get an extra meeting- though it does depend on Leicester beating Rye . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
phillipsr 2,057 Posted September 2, 2017 Whenever this meeting is re-run (5th or 6th sept?) .....as this is allegedly after the stupid cut-off date, will the points actually count?? If they don't it'd be bloody unfair on Lynn if we need the 3 points to avoid finishing bottom of league and relegation play-off?? Maybe if Lynn hadnt called of two meetings against Rye for no reason it wouldnt be an issue l hope the meeting doesnt get run and you finish bottom. Infact if i was Rye promoter id make sure they werent avaliable 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Star Fever 274 Posted September 2, 2017 (edited) Buster said it was a play off push when he sacked Holder and Batch - he didn't say which play off - sacking those two and not at least replace them with like for like replacements is without doubt the biggest own goal in speedway history. But hey least we will get an extra meeting- though it does depend on Leicester beating Rye . Agreed... but IF Leicester win or draw then we'll need 3 pts to overtake ... hence my question Maybe if Lynn hadnt called of two meetings against Rye for no reason it wouldnt be an issue l hope the meeting doesnt get run and you finish bottom. Infact if i was Rye promoter id make sure they werent avaliable LOL - I bet you'd be talking from the other side of your anus if Rye needed the points ..... oh wait Poole are already 4th aren't they.... oh...I see your'e probly not a Rye supporter .... never mind the message is the same whoever your team is .... Edited September 2, 2017 by Star Fever Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
phillipsr 2,057 Posted September 2, 2017 Agreed... but IF Leicester win or draw then we'll need 3 pts to overtake ... hence my question LOL - I bet you'd be talking from the other side of your anus if Rye needed the points ..... oh wait Poole are already 4th aren't they.... oh...I see your'e probly not a Rye supporter .... never mind the message is the same whoever your team is .... They called it off twice for no reason explain hows it unfair that Lynn are unable to fulfill there fixtures Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Trees 2,814 Posted September 2, 2017 It's got to be run for the sake of the fans (particularly season ticket holders) and riders. Hopefully the Stars can nick a win for us, last go this season unless we end up in the relegation meetings of course! 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Haza 1,774 Posted September 2, 2017 (edited) It's got to be run for the sake of the fans (particularly season ticket holders) and riders. Hopefully the Stars can nick a win for us, last go this season unless we end up in the relegation meetings of course! season ticket holders have been ripped off Bt meeting £10 two double headers they've not give a toss about them they are now paying more than if they'd paid on the day Edited September 2, 2017 by Haza Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
phillipsr 2,057 Posted September 2, 2017 It's got to be run for the sake of the fans (particularly season ticket holders) and riders. Hopefully the Stars can nick a win for us, last go this season unless we end up in the relegation meetings of course! They didnt care about there fans whilst calling off meetings for no reason or whilst serving rubbish tracks week after week. Rye House dont owe Lynn fans a thing. They have been shafted by Lynn twice why should they do anything Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Trees 2,814 Posted September 2, 2017 They didnt care about there fans whilst calling off meetings for no reason or whilst serving rubbish tracks week after week. Rye House dont owe Lynn fans a thing. They have been shafted by Lynn twice why should they do anythingNever said Rye owe the fans anything, Buster must get it on for his fans and riders, Rye for their riders. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tellboy 3,662 Posted September 2, 2017 Buster said it was a play off push when he sacked Holder and Batch - he didn't say which play off - sacking those two and not at least replace them with like for like replacements is without doubt the biggest own goal in speedway history. But hey least we will get an extra meeting- though it does depend on Leicester beating Rye . I'm sure you were one of those that were happy to get rid of those two.And surely you would have known like for like for those two weren't readily available.The reason i really knew that was when Poole got rid of KK on his 11+ average and got in Kennett you knew riders weren't willing.Because believe me Ford would have made sure he was going to fill that average. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Daniel Smith 5,666 Posted September 2, 2017 It's got to be run for the sake of the fans (particularly season ticket holders) and riders. Hopefully the Stars can nick a win for us, last go this season unless we end up in the relegation meetings of course! I've a season ticket and been well and truly ripped off. 2017 season for me was over at the Wolves double header. Walked out after heat 15 of the 1st match and won't be back again. As far as I'm concerned, Rye House should be awarded the 4 points Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bald Bloke 3,287 Posted September 2, 2017 I'm sure you were one of those that were happy to get rid of those two.And surely you would have known like for like for those two weren't readily available.The reason i really knew that was when Poole got rid of KK on his 11+ average and got in Kennett you knew riders weren't willing.Because believe me Ford would have made sure he was going to fill that average. Agree,everyone must of thought Lynn would struggle after the whingers went.I think everyone knew Lynn could'nt replace like for like.But i'd rather that and pick up the wooden spoon than let them dictate and kiss their arses. It was a shame as Lynn looked good for 4th at the time. But if like me,who thought it right to get rid,you can't moan to much about the results after "That night" 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Steve Shovlar 10,439 Posted September 2, 2017 Whats Lynn said about the refund from the double header? As a Poole fan I am not interested in reduced admission for the Lynn v Rye meeting. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bald Bloke 3,287 Posted September 2, 2017 Whats Lynn said about the refund from the double header? As a Poole fan I am not interested in reduced admission for the Lynn v Rye meeting. Best email or ring.Good luck Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelvinht 354 Posted September 2, 2017 Whats Lynn said about the refund from the double header? As a Poole fan I am not interested in reduced admission for the Lynn v Rye meeting. Been surprisingly quietly. If like me you paid £25 we ought to be able to get £8 back..or £8 of the rearranged RH meeting 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
