Solidmango 188 Posted June 10, 2018 I’m not one for making changes if it can be avoided but given the continued underperformance I think something needs to be done. Looking at it the latest averages I would look at removing Worrall and Sarjeant which would free up 11.40 plus we would have a further 0.5 to play with, giving a total of 11.90. Based on the set set up of other teams and the fact LW and CV have been excellent all year, I reckon I’d go with a 7ish and 5ish point rider, what’s everyone’s thoughts? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fromafar 10,375 Posted June 10, 2018 Vissing and Kerr are holding the Tigers together so far this season.Thomas was been a good signing.The rest you don't know what's happening race to race.Promotion can't be overjoyed IMO.Still you only have finish top 4. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jenga 2,998 Posted June 10, 2018 2 hours ago, Solidmango said: I’m not one for making changes if it can be avoided but given the continued underperformance I think something needs to be done. Looking at it the latest averages I would look at removing Worrall and Sarjeant which would free up 11.40 plus we would have a further 0.5 to play with, giving a total of 11.90. Based on the set set up of other teams and the fact LW and CV have been excellent all year, I reckon I’d go with a 7ish and 5ish point rider, what’s everyone’s thoughts? who is L.W. is it litchie worrall or lewis where ? 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GS550 449 Posted June 12, 2018 On 6/10/2018 at 11:24 PM, jenga said: who is L.W. is it litchie worrall or lewis where ? Well spotted yenga Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jenga 2,998 Posted June 12, 2018 thank you bogbooby . 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MD 1,307 Posted June 20, 2018 Will we see Jack Smith, just released from Sheffield replace Sarjeant? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gazc 7,098 Posted June 20, 2018 52 minutes ago, MD said: Will we see Jack Smith, just released from Sheffield replace Sarjeant? Wouldn't strengthen us any so no point , it is a 4-5 point reserve we need but would need to make two changes for it to happen. Think what we have is what we will stick with. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SharpenRake 1,505 Posted June 20, 2018 1 hour ago, MD said: Will we see Jack Smith, just released from Sheffield replace Sarjeant? You really don't like Sarjeant, does he owe you money or something Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jenga 2,998 Posted June 20, 2018 i take it you are happy with James . he can do it , but for some reason its just not happening . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MD 1,307 Posted June 20, 2018 2 hours ago, SharpenRake said: You really don't like Sarjeant, does he owe you money or something Dont like his performances, nothing personal. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
4thbender 382 Posted June 22, 2018 On 6/20/2018 at 7:59 PM, MD said: Dont like his performances, nothing personal. On last night's showing he's your best rider. His two heat wins were twice as many as the rest of your team put together. You should look after him - he seems to be your only hope. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
allthegearbutnaeidea 1,735 Posted June 22, 2018 23 minutes ago, 4thbender said: On last night's showing he's your best rider. His two heat wins were twice as many as the rest of your team put together. You should look after him - he seems to be your only hope. 1 meeting doesn’t make a season, he’s underperformed every week for them so far until last night. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dontforgetthefueltapsbruv 10,706 Posted June 22, 2018 39 minutes ago, 4thbender said: On last night's showing he's your best rider. His two heat wins were twice as many as the rest of your team put together. You should look after him - he seems to be your only hope. I think thats just a mathmatical technicality based on the small sample size 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
4thbender 382 Posted June 22, 2018 7 hours ago, dontforgetthefueltapsbruv said: I think thats just a mathmatical technicality based on the small sample size I only deal with hard facts - not mathematical technicalities (even fraudulent corrupt ones!) 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites