ray c 2,299 Posted August 27, 2022 (edited) agree should be deleted poor taste Edited August 27, 2022 by ray c Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Trackrat 444 Posted August 27, 2022 8 minutes ago, Turnip said: Report me then & get me banned! DON'T CARE! I DID PUT VIEWERS DISCRETION ADVISED SO YOU TAKE YOUR CHOICE SIMPLE! COMPLAIN ABOUT THE PERSON WHO POSTED IT ON YOUTUBE! AND IM SHOUTING.....OH DEAR! Nothing to do with viewers discretion, you shouldn’t be putting these videos on a family forum. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Chris116 756 Posted August 27, 2022 2 minutes ago, Trackrat said: Nothing to do with viewers discretion, you shouldn’t be putting these videos on a family forum. I have just tried to ask for the video to be removed but the site says I am not allowed to report a post! 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jonnybegood 258 Posted August 27, 2022 1 hour ago, Trackrat said: Nothing to do with viewers discretion, you shouldn’t be putting these videos on a family forum. I do not think this site enthralls any current school children tbh . parental control should see mums and dads not showing their children nasty videos . 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tyretrax 2,253 Posted August 28, 2022 20 hours ago, Trackrat said: Lack of tact putting a video up of someone in a coma, very poor taste. He's a clown but you have reposted it. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mikebv 10,292 Posted August 28, 2022 12 hours ago, Jonnybegood said: I do not think this site enthralls any current school children tbh . parental control should see mums and dads not showing their children nasty videos . My thoughts too... Just don't press play if you dont want to watch it... Personally that is what I have chosen to do... My choice... And I am free to make it too.... 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Trackrat 444 Posted August 28, 2022 2 hours ago, mikebv said: My thoughts too... Just don't press play if you dont want to watch it... Personally that is what I have chosen to do... My choice... And I am free to make it too.... Well done 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lisa-colette 6,035 Posted August 28, 2022 Looks like Turnips video post has gone now. So only person keeping video on here is Trackrat's post quoting it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Trackrat 444 Posted August 28, 2022 4 minutes ago, lisa-colette said: Looks like Turnips video post has gone now. So only person keeping video on here is Trackrat's post quoting it. Why don’t you grass me up like you & the Paul clique always do. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mikebv 10,292 Posted August 28, 2022 12 minutes ago, Trackrat said: Well done Many thanks... Great being an adult and being able to make your own decisions in life isnt it? And also it means you never ever have to be offended by anything, nor anyone... Although. If you want to be, then that is absolutely fine... But also absolutely fine is the fact that you are allowed to offend others... As, with it being totally unquantifiable, it can only ever be subjective... Which by definition, is based on prejudice... Once again thanks... Mike 54 and 11/12ths.. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lewy 2,326 Posted August 28, 2022 Happy birthday Eddie Kennett from Skidder1. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
King Jamie 356 Posted August 29, 2022 On 8/26/2022 at 6:35 PM, Skidder1 said: New Green Sheet averages for September see Danny King go to Number 1 Not sure how that's worked out. The rulebook states that, where two riders have the same average, whoever was higher in the previous issue would retain seniority. It also says you don't go beyond the second decimal place. Neil Watson stated the rule was written badly and riders are separated beyond two decimal places on occasion. He also proved that Tom Brennan was 'higher' than Ostergaard on this basis (both were 6.62 in the green sheets). Despite that, Ostergaard retained his previous seniority throughout August and Glasgow were able to use guests for him after he picked up an injury, as third heat leader (Brennan no.4). Fast forward to September and we have: Edinburgh - Lasse Frederiksen (4.00) retaining senior status over Jacob Hook (4.00). This is correct, as LF was originally 5.00 at the start of the season. JH has never gone above 4.00. Redcar - Jason Edwards (4.39, previously 4.85) retaining senior status over Kyle Newman (4.39, previously 4.31). Again, this is correct. Poole - Daniel King somehow becoming the new number one (8.26, previously 8.29) ahead of the previous incumbent Steve Worrall (8.26, previously 8.48). For the purposes of consistency, Poole's first opponents in September should lodge a protest and have the line-up adjusted accordingly Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lisa-colette 6,035 Posted August 29, 2022 17 minutes ago, King Jamie said: Not sure how that's worked out. The rulebook states that, where two riders have the same average, whoever was higher in the previous issue would retain seniority. It also says you don't go beyond the second decimal place. Neil Watson stated the rule was written badly and riders are separated beyond two decimal places on occasion. He also proved that Tom Brennan was 'higher' than Ostergaard on this basis (both were 6.62 in the green sheets). Despite that, Ostergaard retained his previous seniority throughout August and Glasgow were able to use guests for him after he picked up an injury, as third heat leader (Brennan no.4). Fast forward to September and we have: Edinburgh - Lasse Frederiksen (4.00) retaining senior status over Jacob Hook (4.00). This is correct, as LF was originally 5.00 at the start of the season. JH has never gone above 4.00. Redcar - Jason Edwards (4.39, previously 4.85) retaining senior status over Kyle Newman (4.39, previously 4.31). Again, this is correct. Poole - Daniel King somehow becoming the new number one (8.26, previously 8.29) ahead of the previous incumbent Steve Worrall (8.26, previously 8.48). For the purposes of consistency, Poole's first opponents in September should lodge a protest and have the line-up adjusted accordingly They can if they want, we seem to do better with Steve at no1 anyway and shame to split up Danny and Ben's partnership. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Skidder1 7,637 Posted August 29, 2022 27 minutes ago, King Jamie said: Not sure how that's worked out. The rulebook states that, where two riders have the same average, whoever was higher in the previous issue would retain seniority. It also says you don't go beyond the second decimal place. Neil Watson stated the rule was written badly and riders are separated beyond two decimal places on occasion. He also proved that Tom Brennan was 'higher' than Ostergaard on this basis (both were 6.62 in the green sheets). Despite that, Ostergaard retained his previous seniority throughout August and Glasgow were able to use guests for him after he picked up an injury, as third heat leader (Brennan no.4). Fast forward to September and we have: Edinburgh - Lasse Frederiksen (4.00) retaining senior status over Jacob Hook (4.00). This is correct, as LF was originally 5.00 at the start of the season. JH has never gone above 4.00. Redcar - Jason Edwards (4.39, previously 4.85) retaining senior status over Kyle Newman (4.39, previously 4.31). Again, this is correct. Poole - Daniel King somehow becoming the new number one (8.26, previously 8.29) ahead of the previous incumbent Steve Worrall (8.26, previously 8.48). For the purposes of consistency, Poole's first opponents in September should lodge a protest and have the line-up adjusted accordingly I was of the understanding that in such circumstances the 3rd decimal point was taken into account, hence putting Danny King at number 1. Unless of course the BSPL have got it wrong - God forbid!!? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lewy 2,326 Posted August 29, 2022 13 minutes ago, Skidder1 said: I was of the understanding that in such circumstances the 3rd decimal point was taken into account, hence putting Danny King at number 1. Unless of course the BSPL have got it wrong - God forbid!!? Poole cheating again 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
