Jaizer 2,903 Posted May 6, 2023 3 hours ago, Bojangles said: It’s almost as if there was an ulterior motive for calling it off. Wonder what it could have been… Again, Lawson and Starke for basso and vissing made Glasgow no weaker. It turned out to be the wrong decision but as has been said before there was a huge kick up after the Berwick meeting getting £4 back. When you're charging what is now a premium price you need to make sure you're putting on a 1st class product. Hindsight is a wonderful thing 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bojangles 608 Posted May 6, 2023 8 minutes ago, Jaizer said: Again, Lawson and Starke for basso and vissing made Glasgow no weaker. It turned out to be the wrong decision but as has been said before there was a huge kick up after the Berwick meeting getting £4 back. When you're charging what is now a premium price you need to make sure you're putting on a 1st class product. Hindsight is a wonderful thing The Glasgow promotion obviously didn't agree with you. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jaizer 2,903 Posted May 6, 2023 Just now, Bojangles said: The Glasgow promotion obviously didn't agree with you. Honestly you're boring now. If knew the background of last few weeks you'd understand the decision 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bojangles 608 Posted May 6, 2023 2 minutes ago, Jaizer said: Honestly you're boring now. If knew the background of last few weeks you'd understand the decision Not sure how the Berwick situation is relevant to Glasgow calling off a meeting because Basso and Vissing were missing! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jaizer 2,903 Posted May 6, 2023 2 minutes ago, Bojangles said: Not sure how the Berwick situation is relevant to Glasgow calling off a meeting because Basso and Vissing were missing! Yawn 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gazc 7,173 Posted May 6, 2023 3 minutes ago, Bojangles said: The Glasgow promotion obviously didn't agree with you. And that insight is based on what ESP you have no idea what their decision was based on. Having a rant on here didn’t change the decision to call it off so as you seem in the know what was it based on if you can share this with us. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gazc 7,173 Posted May 6, 2023 Just now, Jaizer said: Yawn He hasn’t a clue same as you and I he may well be right but who really cares it’s getting very boring now. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bojangles 608 Posted May 6, 2023 1 minute ago, Gazc said: And that insight is based on what ESP you have no idea what their decision was based on. Having a rant on here didn’t change the decision to call it off so as you seem in the know what was it based on if you can share this with us. No rant from me - think you're confusing me with someone else. Regardless, it's a forum, so people are allowed to air their opinions and suspicions. Try not to take it personally. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tyretrax 2,257 Posted May 6, 2023 4 hours ago, Bojangles said: It’s almost as if there was an ulterior motive for calling it off. Wonder what it could have been… You seem to think you know. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fromafar 10,427 Posted May 6, 2023 1 hour ago, lucifer sam said: Rain offs in speedway are part and parcel of the sport. What isn't is calling off a meeting for another reason, and then using predicted very light rain as a very poor excuse. After yesterday's shenanigans, you'll be lucky if more than a handful of away supporters bothering to make the trip to Ashfield, as the Glasgow promotion seem to treat away supporters with contempt. Keep on defending the indefensible, but when there isn't a Glasgow Speedway any more, you might start to wonder why you didn't ask more questions. What is the other reason for call off since you seem to be “in the know”. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lucifer sam 3,960 Posted May 6, 2023 4 minutes ago, Fromafar said: What is the other reason for call off since you seem to be “in the know”. Look back at the rest of the thread and it should become fairly obvious. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tyretrax 2,257 Posted May 6, 2023 You keep avoiding the question, give us your insider information. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rearingtogo 124 Posted May 6, 2023 2 minutes ago, tyretrax said: You keep avoiding the question, give us your insider information. Must be classified Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jaizer 2,903 Posted May 6, 2023 Just do as Sheffield did in 2011 and show up with umbrella's. Although given what's been said maybe rain mates would be more your style 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bojangles 608 Posted May 6, 2023 Just now, Jaizer said: Just do as Sheffield did in 2011 and show up with umbrella's. Although given what's been said maybe rain mates would be more your style It would have to actually be raining first! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
