stevebrum

Same poster. Obvious from the off. That's another 2 pages or more set to be ruined.

Can you two take it to private, this is a Wolves thread.

Not in 2016 they weren't. Holder 8.95 and Lambert 7.08 is a stronger option than KK 7.91 and Hans 7.15. What they might do in 2017 however is open to speculation. Glad we cleared that up

Can wolves fans have their thread back please. Foreverblue you are wasting your time trying to reason with a troll.

Thanks.

Why have they still got 5 in brackets then?

I'm assuming 5 is the lowest level set for any rider not meeting that criteria as there is a few foreign riders under 5.

Masters won't be signing on a full for Wolves. CVS confirmed this last week.

It's no surprise that Kings Lynn are talking to Holder as the hints that he is still doing the top flight have been evident for a long time.

Quite a few predicted this so it doesn't appear a surprise. what is baffling is why Rosco signed a new Dane on an assessed average without knowing what that average would be. They only good thing to come out of this is that we appear to be dropping the ridiculously low 4 or 5 for assessed newcomers. Milik I believe was one of the last of those falsely assessed despite some Poole fans claiming he was a risk signing it was obvious to any sensible speedway fan that he would comfortably beat that. Now with the top flight strength at an all time low no foreign rider should come in on a bargain average. Hansen clearly has potential so if any team wants him give him a set average of 7 because you are signing a youngster for the future not to get a leg up with a ridiculous low average. BWD certainly is going places so it's not like Swindon haven't got a decent replacement. As a Somerset asset Swindon should have priority for fixture clashes.

BWD can't be an Eastbourne asset as NL clubs can't own assets .

Don't think anyone believes the multi poster anyway. If Holder rides here it isn't exactly a science to work out where he might end up.

The point I was making was that Poland have promotion and relegation that is mostly adhered too. I wasn't comparing the systems. I didn't say it was fool proof but on the whole it works and is enforced.

And this a wolves thread not a Poole one.

Not harsh at all, he has earned that from a full season in the PL. Correct. His average was earned as 4 and therefore is subject to a reduction.

Bewley has a valid PL average of 4.

Time will tell I guess however it works well in Poland, less so in Sweden tho. It's clear the long term plan is to keep weakening which to me is the most worrying and probably the one thing that has the lower level of teams on side.

Well they all agree to it so it's time to accept it's happening.

CVS confirmed all clubs are committed to it.

Exactly. It's good of the Wolves management to allow him to go where he wants. Money likely to have played it's part too. I hope they look after him unlike other teams who have sacked him when he hasn't been in decent form. Let's face it Poole haven't a great record for looking after their riders however.

Yes that was mentioned also.

no idea, best ask the BSPA if you want to know more. He won't even match that average anyway as according to you he is well past his sell by date. Have you spoke to Nic to find out his reasons?You are quoting words given as a possible reason.

Neil Watson mentioned this on the Coventry thread - Priority will be with the 'owning' Club, secondly to the rider's Club in the previous season, or finally to the Club from the 'owning' League.

Makes sense now CR

Doyle? Lindgren? ?