stevebrum

In fairness I think Hans is partially guilty in this. MF was saying Hans was long term injured well before Hans commented, and when he did he seemed to suggest that wasn't the case as he planned to ride in that weekends SEC before he then suggested it was unlikely he would ride again this year only to change his mind a week later. Under any description this is NOT a long term injury and Poole have been granted the facility falsely. I'd suggest Hans made the twitter post about him not riding to help Poole get the facility and it wouldn't surprise me either if true. Hans riding 2 weeks after his club being granted a 'long term injury' facility is an absolute disgrace. We know the usual Poole tints will justify this nonsense, the rest are sensible enough to feel a bit embarrassed. Personally speaking I couldn't care if it's Poole, Belle Vue, Wolves or Lakeside - this should never have been allowed in the first place.

MF and the BSPA making a mockery of the injury replacement rule. Poole have replaced their (non) long term injury rider so no way can that long term injured rider be allowed back because it suit them. 1If Poole want to bring back Hans then they should have the 5 points scored by his replacement (which shouldn't have been allowed) deducted from their score on Wednesday. Many questioned if Hans injury was long term/season ending and it seemed Hans then confirmed this on twitter with a picture of his injury so became believable but now deciding to ride again absolutely blows apart that statement and the replacement for a long term injury as a farce. Some Poole fans now are jittery because Lindback is in poor form. Such is life. Poole should have gone with guests , then there wouldn't be all this silly mess.

The sky coverage meant I was able to give the correct answer.

Steve Worrall

You are. I asked you who the 'little gang' are you mentioned. Without the names you are making it up. So, names???

Well 7 isn't fair either. Given that the 5 riders I mentioned are nowhere near that standard. The average makes no difference to the riders. They aren't keen on coming (unless it's short term) under the current regulations otherwise more of them would be here. The rule WAS 8 for GP standard riders and there was nothing wrong in that. Our race format can be testing for the big boys, however Niels, AJ and Doyle don't have trouble reaching that 8 point standard.

That's just the luck I guess. Not ideal. Would work perfectly in Poole's favour. Replacement for Buckz a plus for Poole, replacement for Jacob a negative. Just who is the 'little gang'? Or are you making stuff up again?

2018?

Some people have trouble understanding a basic problem. Wednesday isn't an off race night for Wolves but be interesting to see if the issue of track sharing gets in the way of using the track when WE need it not the pesky lodgers. Hopefully CVS will do the right thing if Monday is rained off, WE need Tuesday not Cradley.

Got to agree, especially for someone that has only been on a bike barely a year. Gifted natural.

7 was and is pathetic. And the logic that Vaculik and Dudek as well would be also 7 is just ridiculous. No idea how they come up with such crazy logic. How they can judge these riders (by average) are worse than King, Fricke, Lambert, Masters and Thorssell? ??? There is no sensible logic. Not one that has an meaning anyway.

Correct, the precedence was set when Woffy came back on his valid 2014 average! But of course you have a valid point if it's okay for Poole at the end of the season then every club have a valid reason!

We have someone at the top of his game and just as successful in our World champ Tai Woffinden if we need a star number one who is more committed to Wolves and British speedway than the dirty dane. Obviously so long as all star riders come back on a 7 then it would have to be considered. Like Pedersen wants to come back to Wolves and British speedway tho.

That makes all of em then. Promoters don't promote.

Wolves. We don't want him.

The new owners have already gone on record stating they would see moving up as progression so it's more than possible. Exactly. He sold the club and fans down the river.

In short.... no.

So in other words I'm right because you haven't given a valid reason why I'm wrong.

Exactly. No riders puts himself out of a job without a job to go to. I'm sure his reasons are genuine however.

Disagree . Wolves, like Poole or any forward thinking promotion probably have already agreed deals with riders for next year. Nothing new about that tho.

Poole will defend a 12 point lead comfortably IMHO.

If you can't defend a 12 point lead you don't deserve to be in the final. Poole's to lose without question. Managed to catch up on the action this morning. Poole riders more switched on and using home advantage well. Wolves riders seemed to struggle defending whilst leading. 8-10 points I thought was the maximum we could allow Poole to take on the night so 12 points I feel will be to much, particularly if we hit them hard from the off and allow an early double pointer that they have in their back pocket. Decent meeting overall.

Aces by 2.

This one? http://www.speedwayplus.com/generators.shtml

OK, I tried to be respectful but you have no decency in reply. So I'm done trying to reason with you and giving you any more courtesy. Your only mode appears to be attack and it's no wonder you get called out time and time again. I have been nothing but respectful to your posts up till now, so your reply above is the last chance for me. No I'm not coming tonight not that you are really asking but attacking but as already pointed out to you I go to watch speedway at least once a week and practise once a week. So to quote you "you talk utter junk". Your lack of respect will be matched in future.