stevebrum

Sadly not for the sensible forum users.

It's WERE or ARE, not WAS stupid. Whereas you ARE. Insulting someone who has previously been polite to you shows you up. No worries I have no need to afford you the same respect anymore. And thanks for confirming what many of us already know.

explain what I'm clueless about. Correct me with the truth then. I'm still waiting for you to name my 'gang' . Still waiting I see.

Think about it. The facility a week before the play offs start is for a LONG TERM INJURY ONLY. We haven't even had the 2nd leg of the semis yet and Hans is riding today abroad. Therefore the facility should NEVER have been given. Hans cannot come back because he has already been replaced. Not temporarily, but long term as the term suggests.

A long term injury IS NOT 2 weeks.

I don't know where and there is no need to call me an idiot when I have been polite to you. Do you wish to stand by that comment?? I don't know who my little crowd are, quoting them is the best way to prove me wrong. So I can wait for proof if needed. I don't belong to any 'gang'. I'm an adult you see.

I don't need to join in. The evidence is clear.

I asked you once and you failed to answer so I will ask you again politely - who are my 'click' or 'gang'? The answer is there isn't one but I'm happy to be proved wrong. As far as Wednesday's go bizarrely our website confirms our off racenight is a Wednesday when it's always been a Tuesday yet there has never been a mention of this. Birmingham race on a Wednesday so I'm shocked that the club would be allowed to even have the same race night as an alternative. (Isnt there some ruling on clubs in a close proximity not being able to race the same night??). Birmingham have an important meeting on Wednesday so I would be very surprised this would be allowed.

In fairness I think Hans is partially guilty in this. MF was saying Hans was long term injured well before Hans commented, and when he did he seemed to suggest that wasn't the case as he planned to ride in that weekends SEC before he then suggested it was unlikely he would ride again this year only to change his mind a week later. Under any description this is NOT a long term injury and Poole have been granted the facility falsely. I'd suggest Hans made the twitter post about him not riding to help Poole get the facility and it wouldn't surprise me either if true. Hans riding 2 weeks after his club being granted a 'long term injury' facility is an absolute disgrace. We know the usual Poole tints will justify this nonsense, the rest are sensible enough to feel a bit embarrassed. Personally speaking I couldn't care if it's Poole, Belle Vue, Wolves or Lakeside - this should never have been allowed in the first place.

MF and the BSPA making a mockery of the injury replacement rule. Poole have replaced their (non) long term injury rider so no way can that long term injured rider be allowed back because it suit them. 1If Poole want to bring back Hans then they should have the 5 points scored by his replacement (which shouldn't have been allowed) deducted from their score on Wednesday. Many questioned if Hans injury was long term/season ending and it seemed Hans then confirmed this on twitter with a picture of his injury so became believable but now deciding to ride again absolutely blows apart that statement and the replacement for a long term injury as a farce. Some Poole fans now are jittery because Lindback is in poor form. Such is life. Poole should have gone with guests , then there wouldn't be all this silly mess.

The sky coverage meant I was able to give the correct answer.

Steve Worrall

You are. I asked you who the 'little gang' are you mentioned. Without the names you are making it up. So, names???

Well 7 isn't fair either. Given that the 5 riders I mentioned are nowhere near that standard. The average makes no difference to the riders. They aren't keen on coming (unless it's short term) under the current regulations otherwise more of them would be here. The rule WAS 8 for GP standard riders and there was nothing wrong in that. Our race format can be testing for the big boys, however Niels, AJ and Doyle don't have trouble reaching that 8 point standard.

That's just the luck I guess. Not ideal. Would work perfectly in Poole's favour. Replacement for Buckz a plus for Poole, replacement for Jacob a negative. Just who is the 'little gang'? Or are you making stuff up again?

2018?

Some people have trouble understanding a basic problem. Wednesday isn't an off race night for Wolves but be interesting to see if the issue of track sharing gets in the way of using the track when WE need it not the pesky lodgers. Hopefully CVS will do the right thing if Monday is rained off, WE need Tuesday not Cradley.

Got to agree, especially for someone that has only been on a bike barely a year. Gifted natural.

7 was and is pathetic. And the logic that Vaculik and Dudek as well would be also 7 is just ridiculous. No idea how they come up with such crazy logic. How they can judge these riders (by average) are worse than King, Fricke, Lambert, Masters and Thorssell? ??? There is no sensible logic. Not one that has an meaning anyway.

Correct, the precedence was set when Woffy came back on his valid 2014 average! But of course you have a valid point if it's okay for Poole at the end of the season then every club have a valid reason!

We have someone at the top of his game and just as successful in our World champ Tai Woffinden if we need a star number one who is more committed to Wolves and British speedway than the dirty dane. Obviously so long as all star riders come back on a 7 then it would have to be considered. Like Pedersen wants to come back to Wolves and British speedway tho.

That makes all of em then. Promoters don't promote.

Wolves. We don't want him.

The new owners have already gone on record stating they would see moving up as progression so it's more than possible. Exactly. He sold the club and fans down the river.

In short.... no.