Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

stevebrum

Members
  • Posts

    14,648
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    20

Everything posted by stevebrum

  1. it would be wasted as the evidence is obvious nothing would be found. Surprised they haven't gone for the triple with Buckz or is that being saved for tomorrow?
  2. And 5 points deducted from Poole for getting a facility for a rider that isn't long term injured.
  3. as many as my imaginary 'gang' I would imagine, or in other words none. No surprise. Plenty have suggested it might happen. Waiting for the excuses on this one as well. I mean just how unlucky can one club be? A long term injured rider who is only short term as it happens and now a rider conveniently twisting his knee racing the day before an important club fixture, just so happens said rider is dreadful as H/L and RR makes them stronger. Terrible luck. Just waiting to hear that Buckz has a mystery illness now to complete the set.
  4. It's WERE or ARE, not WAS stupid. Whereas you ARE. Insulting someone who has previously been polite to you shows you up. No worries I have no need to afford you the same respect anymore. And thanks for confirming what many of us already know.
  5. explain what I'm clueless about. Correct me with the truth then. I'm still waiting for you to name my 'gang' . Still waiting I see.
  6. Think about it. The facility a week before the play offs start is for a LONG TERM INJURY ONLY. We haven't even had the 2nd leg of the semis yet and Hans is riding today abroad. Therefore the facility should NEVER have been given. Hans cannot come back because he has already been replaced. Not temporarily, but long term as the term suggests.
  7. I don't know where and there is no need to call me an idiot when I have been polite to you. Do you wish to stand by that comment?? I don't know who my little crowd are, quoting them is the best way to prove me wrong. So I can wait for proof if needed. I don't belong to any 'gang'. I'm an adult you see.
  8. I asked you once and you failed to answer so I will ask you again politely - who are my 'click' or 'gang'? The answer is there isn't one but I'm happy to be proved wrong. As far as Wednesday's go bizarrely our website confirms our off racenight is a Wednesday when it's always been a Tuesday yet there has never been a mention of this. Birmingham race on a Wednesday so I'm shocked that the club would be allowed to even have the same race night as an alternative. (Isnt there some ruling on clubs in a close proximity not being able to race the same night??). Birmingham have an important meeting on Wednesday so I would be very surprised this would be allowed.
  9. In fairness I think Hans is partially guilty in this. MF was saying Hans was long term injured well before Hans commented, and when he did he seemed to suggest that wasn't the case as he planned to ride in that weekends SEC before he then suggested it was unlikely he would ride again this year only to change his mind a week later. Under any description this is NOT a long term injury and Poole have been granted the facility falsely. I'd suggest Hans made the twitter post about him not riding to help Poole get the facility and it wouldn't surprise me either if true. Hans riding 2 weeks after his club being granted a 'long term injury' facility is an absolute disgrace. We know the usual Poole tints will justify this nonsense, the rest are sensible enough to feel a bit embarrassed. Personally speaking I couldn't care if it's Poole, Belle Vue, Wolves or Lakeside - this should never have been allowed in the first place.
  10. MF and the BSPA making a mockery of the injury replacement rule. Poole have replaced their (non) long term injury rider so no way can that long term injured rider be allowed back because it suit them. 1If Poole want to bring back Hans then they should have the 5 points scored by his replacement (which shouldn't have been allowed) deducted from their score on Wednesday. Many questioned if Hans injury was long term/season ending and it seemed Hans then confirmed this on twitter with a picture of his injury so became believable but now deciding to ride again absolutely blows apart that statement and the replacement for a long term injury as a farce. Some Poole fans now are jittery because Lindback is in poor form. Such is life. Poole should have gone with guests , then there wouldn't be all this silly mess.
  11. The sky coverage meant I was able to give the correct answer.
  12. You are. I asked you who the 'little gang' are you mentioned. Without the names you are making it up. So, names???
  13. Well 7 isn't fair either. Given that the 5 riders I mentioned are nowhere near that standard. The average makes no difference to the riders. They aren't keen on coming (unless it's short term) under the current regulations otherwise more of them would be here. The rule WAS 8 for GP standard riders and there was nothing wrong in that. Our race format can be testing for the big boys, however Niels, AJ and Doyle don't have trouble reaching that 8 point standard.
  14. That's just the luck I guess. Not ideal. Would work perfectly in Poole's favour. Replacement for Buckz a plus for Poole, replacement for Jacob a negative. Just who is the 'little gang'? Or are you making stuff up again?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy