-
Posts
14,648 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
20
Everything posted by stevebrum
-
Bomber To Leave Coventry
stevebrum replied to Perton Wolf's topic in SGB Premiership Speedway League
Wolves would seem a perfect match. -
Coventry Vs Kings Lynn 16/09/2016
stevebrum replied to SCB's topic in SGB Premiership Speedway League
Story of his British career. -
Lakeside V Swindon 16 Sept 2016
stevebrum replied to Speedwaycrazy's topic in SGB Premiership Speedway League
Looking forward to watching the updates to see who takes the final place. Good luck to both teams who wants it most will win. -
That's not nice, and when Poole brought in THJ a few seasons was exactly the same. By the same token I hope Poole get what they deserve too using your logic! ! Nothing.
-
But it wasn't tho, as he didn't ride enough matches for it to count! Or why Jonsson was re-assessed last year at 9.03?
-
Changing A Team For The Play Offs
stevebrum replied to Mark's topic in SGB Premiership Speedway League
-
Changing A Team For The Play Offs
stevebrum replied to Mark's topic in SGB Premiership Speedway League
Of course, I'd be more worried if you actually believed it tho. -
His is the only true average. At least Wolves use real averages
-
I'm purely using the words of others, wolves did everything by the book. I'd rather teams not be allowed to sign riders on low averages just because they want more meetings to suit them and to strengthen for the play offs or at least make the rules transparent. 2 years ago Hancock signed for Poole as late replacement on his OLD average. Last year AJ was re-assessed on 9.03. This year Lindback and apparently the likes of Vaculik and Dudek would be 7 as well. Totally made up year on year to suit . At least Wolves played fair by bringing in a rider on his real average when he too also should have been re-assessed 7. Wolves clearly weren't treated fairly.
-
Just checked that thanks. So the 7 is a 2016 thing then. Feel sorry for Lakeside.
-
I thought he came in on 9.03?? Edited to check BSPA site, it was re-assessed but not a 7? Surprise!
-
Yet Hancock wasn't reassessed when he came in 2 years ago nor AJ who returned with the Hammers a couple of seasons ago either. What we do now know is if anyone brings in a top rider on a 7 next year (highly unlikely but let's be optimistic) it will be a new assessed 7. Hopefully get Tai back next season on a new assessed 7 then.
-
Changing A Team For The Play Offs
stevebrum replied to Mark's topic in SGB Premiership Speedway League
Cough cough THJ cough cough -
Changing A Team For The Play Offs
stevebrum replied to Mark's topic in SGB Premiership Speedway League
There is a cut off date, there is also a grace period for an injury up to 7 days before the play offs start. -
it's only a big one because you claim it would only be a one leg semi if Poole didn't agree. its convenient to forget tho that Wednesday isn't a Wolves race night so was never an option. As stated of Poole refused to race the first leg then I'm sure in fairness of all things speedway that the BSPA often use they would force Poole to race the 1st leg on Wednesday. nothing major to see here. No luck involved POP, it's the sensible outcome. Hopefully seeing as the rules are deemed 'fair' on averages people can stop whinging about Tai coming in on his true average seeing as he was over this imaginary 7 point average. (Not a pop at you by the way, just those calling Tai a ringer) Just to add I am delighted to see Lindback back in British Speedway and it's clear Hans is unable to race which caused the whole replacement issue in the first place. Riders being assessed or re-assessed on a 7 for me is as wrong as when new young foreigners were assessed on a 4. If those are the new rules then there is no biggie. Doesn't mean I have to agree with it.
-
Because he has picked and choose meetings for years and has form for it.
-
As a Monday track with an off night of Tuesday it isn't wolves fault, it's the dates compilers fault.
-
The answer is too many. Bees fans don't care anyway, although if they were in the play offs it would be the 4th time he has been sacked , twice by the same club.
-
It's not a big one. Wolves don't have access on a Wednesday anyway so shouldnt be a big issue at all so absolutely the right thing. As for the question I asked..., would you be happy if Belle Vue signed Emil on a 7 or Dudek on 6.5 to replace Fricke? ..
-
what problem? pure comedy gold. Either bringing in 'ringers' is fine or it isn't seeing as both Poole and wolves have one. Re-Assess Woffy to 9 and Lindback to a minimum 8 seems fair to me.
-
Agreed. it's crazy that he has had a point taken off! fair, but since when have GP riders been assessed as a 7, usually an 8. since when has Tai's 2014 been assessed? he isn't injured. He is planning to ride Saturday. Hopefully the MC will put a block on the move. The extra week given for injured riders is for a season ending one, not one who plans to make a comeback before the play offs even start! Genuine question. If Belle Vue signed Sayfutdinov To replace Fricke on a 7 that be okay? Slight??? Nearly a point isn't slight.
-
Probably easier to name the meetings he has rode in as he has missed so many.
-
I think Shamek is but definetly not Piotr!
-
Belle Vue - Swindon 14. 9. 16
stevebrum replied to A ORLOV's topic in SGB Premiership Speedway League
It's impossible to know anyone got you reported or suspended unless you are claiming you are 'in the know' which would break all forum rules. I take it you can prove you were reported and suspended because of one person otherwise it's the usual hot air with no substance. I wouldn't be surprised you had any of you're accounts suspended as you seem to attack people at will. Over to you. By the way, do you need the postcode for Stoke to be shown up (a bit like 90% of your posts) Hahahaha -
Belle Vue - Swindon 14. 9. 16
stevebrum replied to A ORLOV's topic in SGB Premiership Speedway League
Unlikely. The multi poster bores on and on about it.