Bagpuss

Precisely. This poster has proved multiple times that he doesn't know his arsehole from his earhole so I wouldn't take too much notice.

There is nothing on the Met Office which is far more reliable. Not that forecasts this far out are particularly accurate anyway. People seem to be forgetting that Lynn can't just call fixtures off without the agreement other parties despite it being said about a million times this last week. They will ride with the best guests available, you just have to get on with it and see what happens. Or perhaps a new signing or two, who knows.

He really wouldn't.

I think you know very well that MPT is way off the level of the two unavailable riders. To be honest I'd have no problem with Lynn being forced to use Palm Toft after 28 days of a facility ie some kind of rider control as I hate guests and R/R but as that doesn't happen then the club are going to do what makes them strongest for each meeting.

Yep. Yet another kick in the teeth.

Not based on his home performances. It was said after our first visit to Sheffield in April that his engines were to strong. Perhaps he went too far the other way last night.

Don't want to moan too much about injuries as everyone suffers them but losing Basso would be a massive blow on top of the other two unavailables, he's really started to look the part in recent weeks.

I think he's just a one track pony unfortunately. Fingers crossed that Ben is ok as he's really been looking the part at Lynn recently.

Lynn have spoken to dozens of riders, they are desperately trying to replace both unavailable team members.

Why would Lynn not want to replace Museilak?

I suspect we've both heard the same thing and will probably never know the truth but if Lynn was being run that badly then I'm struggling to believe that Museilak wouldn't be allowed to race elsewhere. And why the riders who do and have ridden for Buster et al at Lynn and P'boro and keep doing so don't withhold their services too.

Lynn now have 'no facility', which is a 75% guest nowadays.

Of course I'm risking the comeback of 'you would say that' but for me if a rider witholds his services then he shouldn't be allowed to go elsewhere that season. If hes sacked then fair enough, or settles his differences and comes back for his original club but there has clearly been some underhand stuff going on here on the rider's part, however he dresses it up. Don't blame Ipswich for asking but I think the BSPL have decided correctly.

I've seen several Peterborough fans at every Lynn meeting this year so far, so there must be some interest. Probably more than you are prepared to admit. Swaffham and Lynn just wouldn't work, it's a sparsely populated area compared to Wolves and Cradley, like comparing apples and oranges. Would have to be one or the other.

I was under the impression that the 75% rule is the lowest level facility available, ie if a rider is absent without a good reason? The idea being that it's way below the level of R/R or a proper guest.

The Chris Holder fiasco I'd imagine.

Presumably we're on the 75% of Musielak's average thing from now on then.

Is this a rearranged fixture?

Heat 15: https://www.facebook.com/share/v/2NvtWfA3ndumstiW/

On what basis is Tom required to be in Poland rather than Redcar?

What a ray of sunshine you are.

He'd be a bloody miracle worker if he can get an away natch called off! As for this, it's a pity Brennan isn't guesting for Lynn rather than Sheffield, would be a far better and closer meeting.

Mainly on the plain?

Why do you make things up? Nobody is blaming anybody for Lynn tonight, as with the other week when it was called off an hour before, all three parties are in agreement. It's the only way Buster and co are allowed to postpone nowadays.

It's a fair point, but they quite clearly can only do it now with the agreement of the other club and the authorities which in theory eliminates all dodginess from the equation.