dontforgetthefueltapsbruv

yet at the start of the season Nielsen Jacobs and Sarjeant to name justca few had no club

Up the Witches 😆😆

like for like would mean the rider contracted would choose to ride elsewhere at the last minute so a NL replacement needed either way 😛

I dont think they will offer you the job so we are safe from that 😛

👹

It was a late replacement. His original 'device' failed the censors scutiny 😲

Thats exactly what the rules say and they were disregarded

Yes - he is good at a dogs dinner

If the BSPA do not ban Holder then I will make my own stand and not attend any meetings he is riding in for the rest of this season That will mean my club misses out on my admission money Perhaps if others are vocal and make a similar stand then their promotions will put pressure on the MC to enforce his ban 😠😠

Do you think any Stars rider would now consider threatening not to ride....

Peterborough should not be awarded another shared event whilst Ged remains in charge

you could form a picket line 😜

When the staging promoter thinks the meeting is not important enough for one of his own riders to compete in then its not important enough for me to spend my money on

Most of the massif have decided to give it a miss

Thorsell was never in the Wolves declared line up so never pulled out officially (although personally you will see my opinions on the relevant original thread on the matter) Holder was declared in the Peterborough line up and is listed in the programme. He has since withdrawn his services. He is fit and contracted to be available. A ban from British Speedway should follow accordingly.

Berwick were quite happy with an arrangement to sign an injury replacement for NBJ after the cut off date but it was denied as its against the rules. The same applies here...

Totally disrespectful to British Speedway and the 2 teams they will be visiting in particular. Disgraceful and should be made an example of (both rider and promotion)

All riders sign to make themselves available for BSPA events. Holder is witholding his services. If Peterborough are sanctioning it then they should have a disrepute charge sent their way.

The regs dont allow a team to choose to promote lower average riders in place of those above when the higher averaged rider is available. Holder is available in line with his contract. If he rides in Poland he is witholding his services. If it is with the approval of the Peterborough promotion then the promotion should have a disrepute charge sent in their direction as well.

If he is banned as he rightly should be then it will affect Poole. If a rider failed a drugs test at a Championship meeting he wouldnt carry on riding in the Premiership. The ban would be (or should) from all British Speedway. Just because it isnt Pooles fault doesnt mean any ban shouldnt apply.

The MC have been very adament that the rules are the rules where Berwick have asked for an injury replacement after the cut off. Now they need to adhere the 28 ban from all British Speedway as per the rules fir skipping a BSPA event to ride elsewhere

Has to be a 28 ban from ALL British Speedway Peterborough and Poole will get a full facility but that isnt the point Promoters need to take stand and not offer him a contract next year Edit - If Peterborough have agreed and taken a pay off as some are suggesting then I would say no facility for them either 😠

Poor show from Holder.If a ban is imposed then it must be for all British Speedway.

Original fears that Kyle had broken his left ankle thankfully appear to be unfounded. Last news was of muscle damage but nothing broken with recovery time unknown at the moment.

Not sure why Lawson should be fuming. Just a typical unfortunate first bend. No exclusion - classic 'all 4 back' Gutted for Kyle. The only luck he has had this year is the bad sort. He was really starting to produce the performances expected/hoped for and 100% effort every heat.