arnieg

It has been common practice for years for teams to make that choice.

Because when he has been unjustifiably missing Plymouth have not used a guest for him. Instead they have gone the "no facility" route which means a facility of a 75% guest. Me thinks this would be better understood if the terminology wasn't so batrubbish contradictory!

Not often one looks at a line up and thinks 'Slovenia must be amongst the favourites'

Is it not because Palovaara has yet to make his debut so MM comes in as a 75% guest?

More like a light breeze last night

Riss I'd imagine

But if crowds are (say) twice/three times that much wouldn't it just lead the application being turned down on traffic grounds?

8 day rule, can't guest on same track twice in 8 days

Spectator excitement levels have rocketed as we search for cover from rain

As the captain of the Titanic said about the iceberg. [There was no drone at Cardiff in 2023 because it crashed in practice]

Sitek piling on the points today

Have you not seen Glasgow, Berwick or Redcar?

If he doesn't I suspect Lynn's tactics will be academic as they'll loose by double digits.

With the rest of the team up and down it is often not until the latter stages that you can judge which of the remaining riders should make way for Klindt's extra rides [obviously one is at the expense of the RS, but the others?]

Piraterna living up to expectations. Is there any update on their fundraising drive or are they at death's door?

No Beau Bailey, Australian, just turning 16, SGP3 medalist.Probably a better prospect than Cairns

He should have accepted the booking, could have had 9 rides then [8 in practice because ht 9 might have been a bit tricky]

Extra rides for Ingram and Perry is probably doing more for rider development than drafting in Sam Woods.

It doesn't. Ask Oxford.

Isn't it: guest or R/R for missing rider followed by ban for withholding services or 75% guest and no ban. - looks like Plymouth have gone for the latter.

I thought of that but as the potential missed match is his debut wouldn't that be a 75% guest? [And therefore lower than Cook]

And the winner of pedant of the day goes to ....

To the best of my knowledge neither of these competitions are usually broadcast on Polish TV (except possibly when staged in Poland) And why would Polish TV wish to broadcast the European Pairs in competition with the Polish Championship Final on the same day. The list of winners is hardly stellar: https://pl.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mistrzostwa_Europy_par_na_żużlu As for the Euro Junior Teams it's been going since 2008 and the main feature is the constant hanging of the upper age limit. Funnily enough I've just written an article about an event that exactly fits your description - the World Speedway League.

Neither of these could be described 'events organised for Polish TV'

They are the two most obvious competitions to cull in a rationalisation of FIM competitions.