YeOldPitGate Posted yesterday at 12:16 PM Report Share Posted yesterday at 12:16 PM 22 hours ago, R87 said: "Please give us our stadium back for our 150 fans. We've got some magic beans you can have". Deluded and pathetic Ha ha good old R87 straight in with the boot. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heathen52 Posted 23 hours ago Report Share Posted 23 hours ago Is it time for SCS to ask the Council about the possibilities of putting a CPO on Brandon?, this is assuming the financial backers would guarantee the funds to cover the CP0 costs, I can't see the council spending tax payers money to save Brandon so any monies that they spend will need to be recovered, failing that I really can't see any other way forward, BE will in my opinion never sell the site and just play the long game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IainB Posted 23 hours ago Report Share Posted 23 hours ago 14 minutes ago, heathen52 said: Is it time for SCS to ask the Council about the possibilities of putting a CPO on Brandon?, this is assuming the financial backers would guarantee the funds to cover the CP0 costs, I can't see the council spending tax payers money to save Brandon so any monies that they spend will need to be recovered, failing that I really can't see any other way forward, BE will in my opinion never sell the site and just play the long game. I think this is already happening from what Phil Morris let slip earlier in the year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
noaksey Posted 19 hours ago Report Share Posted 19 hours ago 4 hours ago, heathen52 said: Is it time for SCS to ask the Council about the possibilities of putting a CPO on Brandon?, this is assuming the financial backers would guarantee the funds to cover the CP0 costs, I can't see the council spending tax payers money to save Brandon so any monies that they spend will need to be recovered, failing that I really can't see any other way forward, BE will in my opinion never sell the site and just play the long game. The problem with that might be if the CPO were to be legally challenged by the owners. Legal costs in dealing with that might become very substantial so they may require those to be included in any guarantee? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1 valve Posted 2 hours ago Report Share Posted 2 hours ago (edited) 17 hours ago, noaksey said: The problem with that might be if the CPO were to be legally challenged by the owners. Legal costs in dealing with that might become very substantial so they may require those to be included in any guarantee? CPO’s are in a large majority of cases successful given that the purchasing authority have done their homework beforehand. In the case of RBC this will be the case. Many CPO’s once instigated never reach court as negotiation usually paves the way for an agreement to be reached. Arriving at a fair & final purchase price of the land can be complex but is set by independent valuers following a well defined formula ensuring the current owner receives a fair price but is also reasonable to the purchaser. Generally accepted practice is that any future costs for clearing or developing the land are not a consideration in setting the valuation and each party is responsible for their own legal costs which is a prominent reason why such cases are settled out of court following negotiations. Edited 2 hours ago by 1 valve Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.