Leicester Lions 2026

[Lionsman66]

13 hours ago, pubichair said:

Both riders are better than Gilkes so that makes the bottom end stronger than leicesters  already and the lynns 1-5 is better than Leicester's 1-5   Imo 

You say that only because they have Fricke 

[40-38]

2 hours ago, Teromaafan said:

I’d probably give Sedgmen another go.

 

He certainly has experience and can gate. Mind you so can Kemp. If he can get over the pulling up at the back he could still do a job. I guess the question would be who has the most improvement in them?

[szkocjasid]

15 hours ago, pubichair said:

Both riders are better than Gilkes so that makes the bottom end stronger than leicesters  already and the lynns 1-5 is better than Leicester's 1-5   Imo 

Lynn's bottom two have great potential, but I wouldn't say they are better than Gilles just now. Maybe by the end of the season?

Whoever Leicester have at 6 (Kemp, Sedgmen, Jeppesen) will be stronger than Castagna. So having a reserve stronger than an opponents second string is a good position to be in.

I certainly think it's interesting to see which team building philosophy works out best.

[Hamish McRaker]

18 hours ago, Teromaafan said:

With all the rumours of the strained relationship between Dickson and Kemp I would have thought that Dickson would have considered Sedgmen. Going back a couple of seasons to the Premiership pairs competition, for their home leg, Dickson selected Fricke and Sedgmen based on the number of heat one 5-1s they’d racked up in the league up to that point. The tactic died on its arse though as Sedgmen hardly trapped all night!

I suppose that riders and team managers having a "full and frank exchange of views" isn't necessarily the termination of the relationship, as with any workplace. Probably just SD's way of trying to get the best out of Kemp, the old "kick up the backside" approach.

I think Brian Clough used to have a long-serving player who used to question Clough's match tactics. He would invite the player into his office for a cup of tea and a chat, "at the end of which he would agree with everything i said".

[GeneralMelchett]

42 minutes ago, Hamish McRaker said:

I suppose that riders and team managers having a "full and frank exchange of views" isn't necessarily the termination of the relationship, as with any workplace. Probably just SD's way of trying to get the best out of Kemp, the old "kick up the backside" approach.

I think Brian Clough used to have a long-serving player who used to question Clough's match tactics. He would invite the player into his office for a cup of tea and a chat, "at the end of which he would agree with everything i said".

Not sure Cloughies methods would work nowadays!

[Hamish McRaker]

11 minutes ago, GeneralMelchett said:

Not sure Cloughies methods would work nowadays!

Probably not in soccerball, no!

[mac101]

11 hours ago, 40-38 said:

He certainly has experience and can gate. Mind you so can Kemp. If he can get over the pulling up at the back he could still do a job. I guess the question would be who has the most improvement in them?

Sedgy’s will finish more races better reliable equipment 

[Fromafar]

12 minutes ago, mac101 said:

Sedgy’s will finish more races better reliable equipment 

Will he score more is the question.🤔

[InTheDeepStuff]

Kemp 100% at number 6 

[stevebrum]

Not having a real number one will always sting a team in the top flight.

besides Peterborough’s dads army side I can’t remember another side solidly packed doing well. 

[IainB]

8 hours ago, stevebrum said:

Not having a real number one will always sting a team in the top flight.

besides Peterborough’s dads army side I can’t remember another side solidly packed doing well. 

Dad's Army was the Covid season as well when the top riders stayed away, Bewley, Kurtz and Jack Holder participated with Bewley & Holder finishing 1 & 2 in the averages but they weren't the riders then that they are now.

I'm inclined to agree that you generally don't win anything without a number one, I hope I'm proved wrong... but can't see it personally.