The White Knight 9,039 Posted October 11, 2013 I believe we are supposed to call them "Ethnic minority Jacks" now in the new all P.C. forum. CLASSIC!!! You are right JL. I blame the Islams... I don't say this often Blazeaway - BUT - you are right too. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
E I Addio 15,849 Posted October 11, 2013 You could be wrong about that E I Addio. Isn't there something in Law that states - Previous Convictions are NOT to be taken in to account or even mentioned until AFTER the Jury has pronounced it's Verdict in a Trial? This is done so as not to prejudice the Jury. Mentioning them on here could therefore prejudice the Jury should any one of them read about it on here. A Billion to One chance I admit - but - it IS possible. Lees previous convictions are in the public domain. Most speedway fans know about them anyway and its highly unlikely that a non-speedway fan will be looking on here. The jury system is very robust and you can't stop others talking about a case. Nobody is suggesting he has any relevant previous history of similar offences/ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
John Leslie 3,213 Posted October 11, 2013 Why? I blame Matt Ford. I don't blame anybody. It's what all the young kids are doing these days 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
E I Addio 15,849 Posted October 11, 2013 I believe we are supposed to call them "Ethnic minority Jacks" now in the new all P.C. forum. Whats wrong with "Ethnic Minority Jacks and Jills" you bigoted misogynist? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
John Leslie 3,213 Posted October 11, 2013 Whats wrong with "Ethnic Minority Jacks and Jills" you bigoted misogynist? Why does it have to be a stereotypical "Jack & Jill"? Why can't it be Jack and Jeffrey if he feels that way inclined? #Homophobe! 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nw42 2,053 Posted October 11, 2013 Why does it have to be a stereotypical "Jack & Jill"? Why can't it be Jack and Jeffrey if he feels that way inclined? #Homophobe! The pair of you are a disgrace to the forum, why the names? 26 & I have been happy for years, we've never needed names, #tetraphobe! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ray Stadia 1,071 Posted October 11, 2013 Why does it have to be a stereotypical "Jack & Jill"? Why can't it be Jack and Jeffrey if he feels that way inclined? #Homophobe! Why does it have to be Jack and Jeffery? Why can't it be Raj and Winston? *racist* 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dave69 1,534 Posted October 11, 2013 Eeeeeeeeeeerrrrrrrrrrrmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm. :unsure: Why are you still posting ? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The White Knight 9,039 Posted October 11, 2013 Why are you still posting ? Because I missed your company. :) 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
george.m 3,063 Posted October 11, 2013 None of this would have happened if Michael Lee's world championship win had been on Eurosport. ...... And I didn't post that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Whisperer 276 Posted October 12, 2013 I chuckled when this forum debated Michaels last misdemeanour, thinking if only you all knew. These further allegations and charges are not representative of the Michael I know never the less public comment ought to be carefully controlled because the circles that Michael worked in could mean that the alleged victims have access to this domain and in reality could be forum members. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Grachan 7,364 Posted October 12, 2013 Can I just take this opportunity to point out that I haven't commented on this topic yet and don't intend to in the near furture. I may reply in the more distant future. I'll post in the near future to let people know if I intend to post in the more distant future. #michaellevellanddarcyward 4 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JC! 142 Posted October 12, 2013 I chuckled when this forum debated Michaels last misdemeanour, thinking if only you all knew. These further allegations and charges are not representative of the Michael I know never the less public comment ought to be carefully controlled because the circles that Michael worked in could mean that the alleged victims have access to this domain and in reality could be forum members. A call for comments to be carefully controlled, followed by a comment that could easily fuel speculation as to who the alleged victim is....... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The White Knight 9,039 Posted October 12, 2013 I think we should drop this............................................... Just my opinion of course. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
