mdmc82 2,878 Posted February 10, 2015 BELLE VUE Cook (Edinburgh) Stead (Sheffield) Worrall (Belle Vue) Stefan (Belle Vue) COVENTRY King (Coventry) Robson (Coventry) Sarjeant (Coventry) KING'S LYNN Kerr (King's Lynn) LAKESIDE Kennett (Lakeside) Lawson (Glasgow) Ellis (Lakeside) Birks (Sheffield). LEICESTER Auty (Scunthorpe) Lambert (Leicester) POOLE Newman (Poole) Starke (Somerset) SWINDON Howarth (Workington) Morris (Swindon) Rose (Swindon) Wright (Somerset). WOLVERHAMPTON Wells (Wolves) Blackbird (Peterborough?). Edited by mdmc82, Today, 06:52 AM. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
spin king 1,923 Posted February 10, 2015 The one's that I know of. So who goes where then? (parent club) Auty (Scunthorpe)Bates (Sheffield)Birks (Scunthorpe)Blackbird (Mildenhall)Cook (Edinburgh)Ellis (Lakeside)Garrity (Rye House)Howarth (Workington)Kennett (Coventry)Kerr (King's Lynn)King (BSPA) CoventryLawson (Glasgow)Morris (Somerset)Newman (Poole)S Lambert (Kings Lynn)R Lambert (Kings Lynn)Nielsen (Coventry) Belle VueRobson CoventryRose (Swindon) King's Lynn Sarjeant (Coventry)Starke (Somerset)Stead (Sheffield)Wells (Coventry)S Worrall (Belle Vue)Wright (Workington) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CardinalSin 346 Posted February 10, 2015 Lewis Blackbird is owned by Mildenhall, so who gets priority, Wolves or Panthers ? Cardinal Sin, please don't come on here & say he belongs to Ipswich, because he doesn't. P.M. me & I will prove it to you. I can't believe you're still banging this drum over and over again. I'm not debating this with you, you're wrong and that's a fact. You say you're a sponsor of Lewis and he's told you personally that he's a Mildenhall asset. I don't disbelieve you at all, and perhaps Blackbird does genuinely think he is a Mildenhall asset.. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
2ndbendbeerhut 1,781 Posted February 10, 2015 The EL should always get priority unless the rider is owned by his PL team. What other sport would give their second tier priority? Then again what other sport lets participants play for more than one team in professional competiton? The asset system is ridiculous and needs scrapping, priority should be sorted via level of competition. That said, if the EL had a set race night that no clubs in lower tiers were allowed to race on then there would be no clashes whatsoever. But why shouldn't it be that the first club the rider signs for gets priority? Also what happens if a rider signs for another team once the season has started? eg Olli Allen, believe he is owned by Swindon but what would happen if he were to sign for an EL club in April. Would he then have to forego his Peterborough fixtures for his new EL club? As for race night, would be better id EL and PL were on different nights. its the fridays that are the problem..... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
proud panther 1,505 Posted February 10, 2015 I can't believe you say its a fact but don't give any evidence to back your claim up. By the way, you are debating this with me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CardinalSin 346 Posted February 10, 2015 (edited) I can't believe you say its a fact but don't give any evidence to back your claim up. By the way, you are debating this with me. Foolishly I've been drawn in again. I've already stated weeks ago that I'd said my last word on the matter and I find myself "debating" with you again, you're quite right. I shouldn't have joined in the conversation in the first place, but alas it's too late. There are eyes on this forum as I'm sure you know, and I genuinely don't want to get myself in trouble (if I'm not already) by debating further. If it makes you feel any better, Lewis Blackbird is a Mildenhall asset. Now that IS my last word on the matter. Edited February 10, 2015 by CardinalSin Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Greg 123 Posted February 10, 2015 The guys from Lynn like Lewis Kerr and Robert Lambert will ride for lynn first then i guess with rider not riding for there clubs they are owned by is who ever they signed for first. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
proud panther 1,505 Posted February 10, 2015 That's why I requested that you reply via a private message, but you declined. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mdmc82 2,878 Posted February 10, 2015 The guys from Lynn like Lewis Kerr and Robert Lambert will ride for lynn first then i guess with rider not riding for there clubs they are owned by is who ever they signed for first. the rule has now been confirmed that if the rider isnt riding for their parent club then priority is with the club in the same league as his parent club (not who he signed for first) An example of this is Edward Kennett. He is riding for Lakeside (EL) & Rye house (PL) As his parent club Coventry are an EL club, this means Lakeside will get priority over fixture clashes Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The White Knight 9,039 Posted February 10, 2015 the rule has now been confirmed that if the rider isnt riding for their parent club then priority is with the club in the same league as his parent club (not who he signed for first) An example of this is Edward Kennett. He is riding for Lakeside (EL) & Rye house (PL) As his parent club Coventry are an EL club, this means Lakeside will get priority over fixture clashes There's nowt so queer as Speedway's Rules and Regulations. :blink: 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tsunami 10,219 Posted February 10, 2015 the rule has now been confirmed that if the rider isnt riding for their parent club then priority is with the club in the same league as his parent club (not who he signed for first) An example of this is Edward Kennett. He is riding for Lakeside (EL) & Rye house (PL) As his parent club Coventry are an EL club, this means Lakeside will get priority over fixture clashes Surely if the meeting is a rearranged one by the EL teams, it would be fair and justifiable to let the rider/s in question to ride for a previously agreed PL fixture. 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mdmc82 2,878 Posted February 10, 2015 Surely if the meeting is a rearranged one by the EL teams, it would be fair and justifiable to let the rider/s in question to ride for a previously agreed PL fixture. that will be the case if the fixture is rearranged and not an original one 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cue Ball 416 Posted February 10, 2015 if I was a club that had signed a rider expecting them to be available for all my meetings as they weren't contracted to another club, I think I would be more than a bit peeved if they signed for another, something I couldn't prevent, that then meant they were going to miss x % of my meetings. This just seems like a strange rule to me - think it should have stopped as being he who signs first, gets priority 4 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Aries 440 Posted February 10, 2015 Lewis Blackbird is owned by Mildenhall, so who gets priority, Wolves or Panthers ? Cardinal Sin, please don't come on here & say he belongs to Ipswich, because he doesn't. P.M. me & I will prove it to you. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nikko 181 Posted February 10, 2015 Re Lewis Blackbird. Individuals cannot own riders assets and have not been able to for years. Chris Louis cannot own him. Lewis signed as a Mildenhall asset and as far as I know has never been sold. He certainly does not belong to Chris. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
