Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Recommended Posts

29 minutes ago, iainb said:

Specifically, the year on year decline of the sport in this country, probably the most tracks closing down in shortest amount of time and culminating in last season, the worst in the sports history imo all under his watch. Look, if you think he's doing a great job, that's fair enough, can you specifically point out any improvements he's made to the sport in this country?

but isn't that down to individual tracks and possibly their own business model?

some clubs will be let down by their landlords too, what can the BSPL do about that?

if some clubs want to pay well over the odds then it's their choice, and hopefully this year things can be reigned in by controlling guarantees to riders .. in my mind that's what has been one of the biggest issues over the years as riders know what they'll get whether they score 0 or 15.

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, stevehone said:

but isn't that down to individual tracks and possibly their own business model?

some clubs will be let down by their landlords too, what can the BSPL do about that?

if some clubs want to pay well over the odds then it's their choice, and hopefully this year things can be reigned in by controlling guarantees to riders .. in my mind that's what has been one of the biggest issues over the years as riders know what they'll get whether they score 0 or 15.

 

What's the point of the leader then? I don't think riders being on guarantees has affected crowds much do you?

Edited by iainb

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, stevehone said:

but isn't that down to individual tracks and possibly their own business model?

some clubs will be let down by their landlords too, what can the BSPL do about that?

if some clubs want to pay well over the odds then it's their choice, and hopefully this year things can be reigned in by controlling guarantees to riders .. in my mind that's what has been one of the biggest issues over the years as riders know what they'll get whether they score 0 or 15.

 

And how on earth does a governing body control guarantees, have you never heard of sponsors or brown envelopes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, racers and royals said:

Presumably they only have sole authority within the SCB rulebook- the BSPL were no doubt interpreting a rule one way and  when the SCB  got involved interpreted it another way- typical  badly worded rules !!!

8 Chapters out of 20 are controlled by the BSPL, it’s interesting that nearly all the problems come from those 8 chapters.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, iainb said:

Specifically, the year on year decline of the sport in this country, probably the most tracks closing down in shortest amount of time and culminating in last season, the worst in the sports history imo all under his watch. Look, if you think he's doing a great job, that's fair enough, can you specifically point out any improvements he's made to the sport in this country?

In fairness I don't feel he's doing a great job but do think he's doing the best he can with the hand he's dealt. All the clubs closing down are not his fault but the fault of poor ownership and unscrupulous other individuals or those just wanting to cash in on an asset they own . There are no improvements that have been made but don't feel this can be aimed at the individual it's more about the collective who in the main only concentrate on their individual business and not the sport in general. You can lead a horse to water but can't make it drink

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, iainb said:

What's the point of the leader then? I don't think riders being on guarantees has affected crowds much do you?

If you read the article the role is not really a leadership role

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
57 minutes ago, phillwhitewasmad said:

If you read the article the role is not really a leadership role

He mentions how getting 'someone' in the role of "leader" is an aim, but that 'someone'would need to have the money to properly "lead the sport"...

His role as far as I can see is more a 'sounding board' for any queries that come to light rather than a visionary who sets out how the sport will evolve...

His influence on the sport will begin and end with his own club Scunthorpe I would suggest, no more than that, similar to how every other promoter influences the sport...

Great to see The Star doing such interesting interviews with those who are heavily involved in UK Speedway's "success", or not, as the case may be...

And good to hear that much of what we often on here complain about is getting some focus on trying to improve..

More open information from those who run the sport would certainly help their image and maybe engage more support for them...?

Edited by mikebv
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, bigcatdiary said:

And how on earth does a governing body control guarantees, have you never heard of sponsors or brown envelopes.

but the CLUB can restrict, and if sponsors want to pay that's up to them, but should be separate from the clubs

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, iainb said:

I don't think riders being on guarantees has affected crowds much do you?

no because the supporters don't generally know the situation, but it certainly affects the clubs

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, stevehone said:

no because the supporters don't generally know the situation, but it certainly affects the clubs

Remember a "pay restraint" was imposed on Hans prior to the 1993 season which led him to move to Coventry and the Oxford scene was never the same again. Unless I'm mistaken the governing body tried to introduce a pay structure but like most things in the sport went the way of many other initiatives in an attempt to curb spiralling costs. Funny, however, that Coventry managed to entice Hans when Oxford failed but outside influences dictated..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, steve roberts said:

Remember a "pay restraint" was imposed on Hans prior to the 1993 season which led him to move to Coventry and the Oxford scene was never the same again. Unless I'm mistaken the governing body tried to introduce a pay structure but like most things in the sport went the way of many other initiatives in an attempt to curb spiralling costs. Funny, however, that Coventry managed to entice Hans when Oxford failed but outside influences dictated..

of course, there will always be outside influences, but as long as it's not the CLUB having to fork out then they can work within a budget

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, phillwhitewasmad said:

If you read the article the role is not really a leadership role

So what you're really saying is that there's nobody in charge, which would explain everything really. 

As usual with speedway the management setup is really neither one thing or another. If it was a proper limited company there would be a chief executive officer answerable to the board of directors and/or shareholders. But the board only consists of Godfrey, Louis, Ford & Bates... and as far as I know their club assets are not part of BSPL... So what exactly is BSPL? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, steve roberts said:

Remember a "pay restraint" was imposed on Hans prior to the 1993 season led him to move to Coventry and the Oxford scene was never the same again. Unless I'm mistaken the governing body tried to introduce a pay structure but like most things in the sport went the way of many other initiatives in an attempt to curb spiralling costs. Funny, however, that Coventry managed to entice Hans when Oxford failed but outside influences dictated..

I remember it was quoted that over £100k was the difference between the "old rate" and the "new rate" for some top class riders at the time, and that some of them simply were not going to ride... 

Hence some got sponsored by "companies" that suddenly sprang up....

And then everyone got paid the going rate...   :rolleyes: ;)

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, stevehone said:

no because the supporters don't generally know the situation, but it certainly affects the clubs

What really affects clubs is bums on seats :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, iainb said:

What really affects clubs is bums on seats :)

absolutely, but if there's not enough bums on seats to cover all the outgoings .....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy