Jump to content
British Speedway Forum
Sign in to follow this  
Roger Jacobs

Leicester v MIldenhall - Play off Final 2nd Leg - Friday, 4th November

Recommended Posts

From Mildenhall Speedway

"We head towards Friday evenings NDL Play Off Final with a very patched up side.
With Ryan, James, Sam, Jack and Alex all missing we now add Josh who is having a pre op this week (we send Josh our very best wishes) and young Luke Harrison who is away.
Under current rules we will line up as follows:
1. Jason Edwards
2. RR
3. Unattached 3 pointer
4. Unattached 3 pointer
5. Guest
6. Unattached 3 pointer
7. Luke Muff
8. Unattached 3 pointer
We are working hard to find a guest from the clubs available to us and will inform you of the team once we sort it."
  • Sad 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, Roger Jacobs said:

From Mildenhall Speedway

"We head towards Friday evenings NDL Play Off Final with a very patched up side.
With Ryan, James, Sam, Jack and Alex all missing we now add Josh who is having a pre op this week (we send Josh our very best wishes) and young Luke Harrison who is away.
Under current rules we will line up as follows:
1. Jason Edwards
2. RR
3. Unattached 3 pointer
4. Unattached 3 pointer
5. Guest
6. Unattached 3 pointer
7. Luke Muff
8. Unattached 3 pointer
We are working hard to find a guest from the clubs available to us and will inform you of the team once we sort it."

Just concede the Tie.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So it's:

1 Jason Edwards

2 R/R

3 James Laker

4 Bailey Fellows

5 Tom Woolley [G]

6 Ashton Boughen

7 Luke Muff

8 James Jessop

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, arnieg said:

So it's:

1 Jason Edwards

2 R/R

3 James Laker

4 Bailey Fellows

5 Tom Woolley [G]

6 Ashton Boughen

7 Luke Muff

8 James Jessop

 

 

Not good for the sport.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Fromafar said:

Not good for the sport.

It certain isn't, with probably on three riders capable of scoring any points on the night.

I really feel for Mildenhall and the public over the ridiculous situation they've been put in.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Fromafar said:

Not good for the sport.

Awful, can't see any fans wanting to go Leicester will be hit with paying riders mostly double figures 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, arnieg said:

So it's:

1 Jason Edwards

2 R/R

3 James Laker

4 Bailey Fellows

5 Tom Woolley [G]

6 Ashton Boughen

7 Luke Muff

8 James Jessop

 

 

Not even a particularly astute line up. Laker & Fellows take 3 rides together so will be scrapping over a point, Woolley & Boughen take 2 rides together. At least sticking Wooley at 3 and Laker at 5 would have spread the points chances a bit and reduce it from being an embarrassment to a shambles.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Mimmo said:

It certain isn't, with probably on three riders capable of scoring any points on the night.

I really feel for Mildenhall and the public over the ridiculous situation they've been put in.  

Which three?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, mc131 said:

Awful, can't see any fans wanting to go Leicester will be hit with paying riders mostly double figures 

The match should not take place with that Mildenhall Team it’s Jason Edwards v Leicester .Though there was a points limit(lower).Maybe not in NDL though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Fromafar said:

The match should not take place with that Mildenhall Team it’s Jason Edwards v Leicester .Though there was a points limit(lower).Maybe not in NDL though.

Sadly just ridiculous rules again Mildenhall should of been allowed at least 2 field a competitive team 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, mc131 said:

Sadly just ridiculous rules again Mildenhall should of been allowed at least 2 field a competitive team 

Rules not ideal.

Berwick and Oxford had to run r/r for the rider second in their averages also. If your team is built the wrong way (good top 2 or 3) then this seriously weakens you (ok if you have strength in depth team).

Won't bother with the stream.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Fromafar said:

The match should not take place with that Mildenhall Team it’s Jason Edwards v Leicester .Though there was a points limit(lower).Maybe not in NDL though.

As the NDL rules force the use of RR and multiple 3 point riders in circumstances such as this there can't be a minimum team points total. The six riders programmed have a combined average of 30.62, which I expect exceeds the seven-man total of the infamous S****horpe team of a few years ago. I'm surprised to see Boughen in the line-up as this meeting will give him an MA I believe.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, NeilWatson said:

As the NDL rules force the use of RR and multiple 3 point riders in circumstances such as this there can't be a minimum team points total. The six riders programmed have a combined average of 30.62, which I expect exceeds the seven-man total of the infamous S****horpe team of a few years ago. I'm surprised to see Boughen in the line-up as this meeting will give him an MA I believe.

There’s not much hope for the sport if it continues in this manner.Fag packet stuff and rules that change every season( in some cases weekly).

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, NeilWatson said:

As the NDL rules force the use of RR and multiple 3 point riders in circumstances such as this there can't be a minimum team points total. The six riders programmed have a combined average of 30.62, which I expect exceeds the seven-man total of the infamous S****horpe team of a few years ago. I'm surprised to see Boughen in the line-up as this meeting will give him an MA I believe.

Combined team now 28.84 with the withdrawal of Luke Muff :-(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, NeilWatson said:

Combined team now 28.84 with the withdrawal of Luke Muff :-(

There used to be a rule back in the day about a minimum team strength, I take it there is no such rule anymore?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy