Jump to content
British Speedway Forum
*JJ

Birmingham Brummies 2023

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Nickinho said:

"Following Nick Morris Breach of the SCB Regulations at Birmingham Speedway on the 12th July 2023 and therefore receiving a 30 day suspension of his SCB Registration pending a SCB Disciplinary Hearing, the hearing was due to take place on the 25th July 2023. Mr Morris and his legal team requested a postponement of the hearing for a later date, on the understanding that Mr Morris suspension would continue until the hearing takes place, regardless that the date exceeded the initial 30 day suspension period."

 

How does this legal move make sense??

He’s probably in Poland partying with his Aussie mates.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Fromafar said:

He’s probably in Poland partying with his Aussie mates.

Now that would be taking the pi$$!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Skidder1 said:

Now that would be taking the pi$$!!

His pal Darcy is there though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He's allegedly mortified that he's misplaced his favourite trinket. 

Very attached to an empty Coca Cola bottle allegedly. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, Nickinho said:

"Following Nick Morris Breach of the SCB Regulations at Birmingham Speedway on the 12th July 2023 and therefore receiving a 30 day suspension of his SCB Registration pending a SCB Disciplinary Hearing, the hearing was due to take place on the 25th July 2023. Mr Morris and his legal team requested a postponement of the hearing for a later date, on the understanding that Mr Morris suspension would continue until the hearing takes place, regardless that the date exceeded the initial 30 day suspension period."

How does this legal move make sense??

The only thing that comes to mind is that Nick and his team are conducting their own blood/laboratory tests. If these show him to be innocent of drug taking and the SCB accept the evidence as admissible, that might help his case. He may, however, still be punished for non compliance with the testing procedure.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, False dawn said:

The only thing that comes to mind is that Nick and his team are conducting their own blood/laboratory tests. If these show him to be innocent of drug taking and the SCB accept the evidence as admissible, that might help his case. He may, however, still be punished for non compliance with the testing procedure.

If that’s the case are they saying that methods being used in speedway are not right,don’t think that will help his case.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, False dawn said:

The only thing that comes to mind is that Nick and his team are conducting their own blood/laboratory tests. If these show him to be innocent of drug taking and the SCB accept the evidence as admissible, that might help his case. He may, however, still be punished for non compliance with the testing procedure.

The thing there is tho, surely any samples will have had to be taken at the same time of the event?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It could be a Stuart Dickson masterplan!.Keep him suspended and get better riders to guest for Brummies to help get Top 6 place.!!

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Refusing a test carries the same punishment of being tested positive. He’s stuffed with a long ban regardless.

  • Like 7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Steve Shovlar said:

Refusing a test carries the same punishment of being tested positive. He’s stuffed with a long ban regardless.

Would agree with that.

You have too question why he didn’t take 2nd sample.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Fromafar said:

Would agree with that.

You have too question why he didn’t take 2nd sample.

Both Barker and Kyle Hogarth took their 2nd test so they could argue their case Nick refused so that’s his downfall big ban coming

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, mac101 said:

Both Barker and Kyle Hogarth took their 2nd test so they could argue their case Nick refused so that’s his downfall big ban coming

Its almost admitting guilt not taking the 2nd test

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Fromafar said:

It could be a Stuart Dickson masterplan!.Keep him suspended and get better riders to guest for Brummies to help get Top 6 place.!!

Could be?

Keep calling off the hearing till the end of the season and, it all blows away in a wintery wind.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, False dawn said:

The only thing that comes to mind is that Nick and his team are conducting their own blood/laboratory tests. If these show him to be innocent of drug taking and the SCB accept the evidence as admissible, that might help his case. He may, however, still be punished for non compliance with the testing procedure.

 

5 hours ago, Fromafar said:

If that’s the case are they saying that methods being used in speedway are not right, don’t think that will help his case.

4 hours ago, ruffdiamond said:

The thing there is tho, surely any samples will have had to be taken at the same time of the event?

I didn't say it was valid or might work in Nick's favour. I'm just guessing in the absence of any public facts. Like everyone else.

 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy