Jump to content
British Speedway Forum
Sign in to follow this  
Beirao

Classic Speedway Memories- April Edition

Recommended Posts

April's edition is now on line and features

Scottish Pirates -  the rather fanciful attempts to form a breakaway league in the early 50s

Cycle Speedway Graduates - the riders who started their careers on pedals

Exeter - My Favourite Away Track -  I loved my times at The County Ground

Big Birthdays -more cake and candles for landmark celebrations

Anyone Remember No 5 -  our monthly meander down Memory Lane

https://classicspeedwaymemories.webador.co.uk/

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/16/2023 at 8:14 AM, Beirao said:

April's edition is now on line and features

Scottish Pirates -  the rather fanciful attempts to form a breakaway league in the early 50s

Cycle Speedway Graduates - the riders who started their careers on pedals

Exeter - My Favourite Away Track -  I loved my times at The County Ground

Big Birthdays -more cake and candles for landmark celebrations

Anyone Remember No 5 -  our monthly meander down Memory Lane

https://classicspeedwaymemories.webador.co.uk/

When I saw "Scottish Pirates" I thought it might be a reference to Ross Gilbertson who once appeared for Scotland. When I approached him as he was going into the pits at New Cross and asked him if he had Scottish ancestry, he simply replied "och aye." 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, Split said:

When I saw "Scottish Pirates" I thought it might be a reference to Ross Gilbertson who once appeared for Scotland.

Not strictly true. He rode in three tests against England in 1964, and against the Soviet Union the following year.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/16/2023 at 8:14 AM, Beirao said:

April's edition is now on line and features

Scottish Pirates -  the rather fanciful attempts to form a breakaway league in the early 50s

Cycle Speedway Graduates - the riders who started their careers on pedals

Exeter - My Favourite Away Track -  I loved my times at The County Ground

Big Birthdays -more cake and candles for landmark celebrations

Anyone Remember No 5 -  our monthly meander down Memory Lane

https://classicspeedwaymemories.webador.co.uk/

You have left out my cousin Martin Elliott who started out riding for South London and also captained Scotland cycle speedway team, and later went on to ride for Wimbledon Dons. Bit obscure, so i forgive you for that :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, iris123 said:

You have left out my cousin Martin Elliott who started out riding for South London and also captained Scotland cycle speedway team, and later went on to ride for Wimbledon Dons. Bit obscure, so i forgive you for that :D

Intrigued to hear about Martin. Did he ride for South London Rangers and if so when. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Beirao said:

Intrigued to hear about Martin. Did he ride for South London Rangers and if so when. 

Yes. Rode for South London Rangers. I know he rode for Scotland in 1991. He then rode for the Dons in their revival around 2005 ish

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/17/2023 at 3:20 PM, chunky said:

Not strictly true. He rode in three tests against England in 1964, and against the Soviet Union the following year.

 

Scotland Vs. Soviet Union?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Split said:

Scotland Vs. Soviet Union?

 

Yep. It was 10th July at Meadowbank. The programme says Scotland vs "Russia", but it's listed on the international speedway website as "Soviet Union".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
51 minutes ago, chunky said:

Yep. It was 10th July at Meadowbank. The programme says Scotland vs "Russia", but it's listed on the international speedway website as "Soviet Union".

Given at least one of the team was not Russian (Latosinski) I would go with USSR/Soviet Union

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, arnieg said:

Given at least one of the team was not Russian (Latosinski) I would go with USSR/Soviet Union

I don't disagree at all, and honestly, progs never were the most accurate source of information! Of course, back then, western Europeans really didn't know the difference - particularly speedway fans - and the two terms were often interchangeable 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, arnieg said:

Given at least one of the team was not Russian (Latosinski) I would go with USSR/Soviet Union

From memory I seem to recall that the 1974 Test Series held in the UK some programmes labelled them as Russia whilst others the USSR/Soviet Union?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, steve roberts said:

From memory I seem to recall that the 1974 Test Series held in the UK some programmes labelled them as Russia whilst others the USSR/Soviet Union?

That wouldn't surprise me at all! Then there was the term "Soviet Russia"...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, chunky said:

That wouldn't surprise me at all! Then there was the term "Soviet Russia"...

In the beginning there was Russia, well at least from the 14th century.  Russia gained an empire. Following the 1917 revolution there was Soviet Russia, from 1918 until 1922, otherwise called the Russian Soviet Republic.  In 1922 a group of national republics formed a federal union with its capital in Moscow.  The proper title of the federation was the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, which lasted until 1991.  Any ‘national’ speedway or other sporting team during this period should properly have been called U.S.S.R., not Russia or Soviet Russia, although Soviet Union was acceptable as an alternative.  By the time the Baltic States had been annexed in June 1940 the U.S.S.R. comprised Armenia, Azerbaijan, Byelorussia (also called White Russia and now Belorus), Estonia, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kirgizia (now Kyrgystan), Latvia, Lithuania, Moldavia (now Moldova), Russia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Ukraine and Uzbekistan.  With the dissolution of the U.S.S.R. in 1991 the constituent members became countries in their own right, including the Russian Federation, with its capital in Moscow.

My A-level geography teacher was a lucky (and foolish) man as he took photographs/slides of sites across the U.S.S.R. from Leningrad (now St. Petersburg) in the west to Vladivostok in the east without being caught.  He was able to show them in school lessons a lifetime ago.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, BL65 said:

In the beginning there was Russia, well at least from the 14th century.  Russia gained an empire. Following the 1917 revolution there was Soviet Russia, from 1918 until 1922, otherwise called the Russian Soviet Republic.  In 1922 a group of national republics formed a federal union with its capital in Moscow.  The proper title of the federation was the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, which lasted until 1991.  Any ‘national’ speedway or other sporting team during this period should properly have been called U.S.S.R., not Russia or Soviet Russia, although Soviet Union was acceptable as an alternative.  By the time the Baltic States had been annexed in June 1940 the U.S.S.R. comprised Armenia, Azerbaijan, Byelorussia (also called White Russia and now Belorus), Estonia, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kirgizia (now Kyrgystan), Latvia, Lithuania, Moldavia (now Moldova), Russia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Ukraine and Uzbekistan.  With the dissolution of the U.S.S.R. in 1991 the constituent members became countries in their own right, including the Russian Federation, with its capital in Moscow.

My A-level geography teacher was a lucky (and foolish) man as he took photographs/slides of sites across the U.S.S.R. from Leningrad (now St. Petersburg) in the west to Vladivostok in the east without being caught.  He was able to show them in school lessons a lifetime ago.

Oh, I get it! As I said, uneducated westerners would often be unaware of the differences (and don't even get me started on the American confusion regarding the Netherlands and Denmark), and of course, even dear old Dave Lanning would refer to them as "Russkies".

Edited by chunky

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, chunky said:

Oh, I get it! As I said, uneducated westerners would often be unaware of the differences (and don't even get me started on the American confusion regarding the Netherlands and Denmark), and of course, even dear old Dave Planning would refer to them as "Russkies".

You certainly got me confused. the Netherlands and Denmark ? And Dave Planning ? :blink:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy