-
Topics
-
Posts
-
By szkocjasid · Posted
As this is someone using their own stats, I think it's correct to point out they have missed a rider. That's a bit different to saying Tate shouldn't be that low etc. -
By szkocjasid · Posted
Why would they be a "mercenary guest" they get asked to ride & agree to do it, what's wrong with that? -
By szkocjasid · Posted
Are you contradicting yourself here, you say the only rider Pawlicki would replace is Flint, but also say you wouldn't put Lampart in heat 13 when Pawlicki was available. So if Pawlicki is preferred over Lampart in the r/r spot, why wasn't he preferred over Lampart in one of Lampart's heats? I certainly would have told Pawlicki he was needed in heat 14 before heat 13, then decide if he could manage 4 on the trot, but I wouldn't have used Flint. We may have to agree to disagree on this one. -
Clueless from you if you’re even asking that question.
-
By Arch Stanton · Posted
Disagree. The only rider Pawlicki was going to replace was flint. Yes, he could have used Pawlicki in heat 4 for Flint, but Pawlicki had just had two on the trot at that stage and it was still early in the meeting. He then replaced Flint in heat 12. I’m not sure many would have put Lampart in 13 for the R/R when Pawlicki was still able to take it, three on the trot or not. But after then running a last it’s no surprise Pawlicki didn’t then do 4 on the trot in heat 14. It is what it is, I don’t see any major bollock dropped by Sam here if I’m honest. -
I would be mightily surprised if there wasn't work going on in the background, as has been mentioned in other threads, riders that have priced themselves unknowingly of the shop window (Rowe) and pure rider availability is what's slowing the process I would imagine. I would say first thing on the radar for 2025 is getting a danish paring back in the engine room. It's worked the last handful of years,Uli,Sam,Ben,Claus..... And seems to be where we're missing out this year.
-
-
Who's Online (See full list)