stevebrum

TBH I didn't think the governing body could muck up the averages any worse than the multiplyer farce of last year. However it seems they really can. Assessed and reassessed averages for some and not others with no real logic to the decisions is making it shape up to be the most corrupt season in a long time. We should be doing everything we can to endure British riders have the team spots they need. Making an average stick after a handful of meetings is plain ridiculous. And if they are helping one (Clegg) to a nice low average after meetings you can count on 1 hand and penalising another using the logic is plain bonkers. I see no reason why they can't both be using their start of 2017 averages as neither did enough meetings to qualify for a new 2018 top flight average. It seems the required amount of meetings to qualify can change rider on rider. Corrupt to the core.

Clegg only did 4 matches, Ritchie did 7. If one is fair then both are. Can't see a logical reason for one and not the other.

I didn't say it was a definite. Looks like they have set the precedent with Clegg however. But then this is the BSPA so it can be any average. Not confirmed anywhere. But shouldn't be.

7.26 was his established average from Poole. He rode 7 meetings. Given Clegg was given a 2.00 average based on 4 matches for Wolves in 2017 I assume that Richie's would be too. 7.26

Development league.

The polish ruling confirmation. That's the only one that's important. Got that one?

Let's hope the Poles like a motocross track as a home circuit.

Fact is Tungate has a way inferior top flight to Morris.

Care to post the confirmation link?

Has said he isn't starting the season anywhere in UK.

But probably better than Kurtz.

Of waiting for Bjarne Pedersen to confirm he will be cheaper?

I read it different as poorly punctuated. Read it that they have seen Bewley and then what the scores were. If you follow the reply back.

Fricke has yet to show his foreign form in the UK but is more than capable of challenging Cook for the number one jacket. (Assuming he is an Ace of course). As for Bewley, what a talent. Can see him adding 1-2 points on his average.

You missed my point. Woryna signed before the season as a Poole asset, whilst Mateusz was already an asset of Poole. Little chance any other club could have then.

Not really tho FB, Woryna signed as a Poole asset and Mateusz is also an asset. No other clubs really stood a chance of signing either.

Wasn't a Wolves. But yes you are absolutely right. Holder has had some great meetings at Monmore.

Someone else carried it on I think you forgot to add. Hope you managed to get some sleep also.

Yet Jacob was in the top 6 away averages last year.

Thanks. I wasn't 100% who it was he beat but decent standard riders for a newcomer. I've seen Holder score double figures at Poole so he can ride the track well, but rarely does. It's only really 1 poster.

I'm sure Woryna beat Freddie at Wolves when riding for Coventry in his first season although lacked the consistency to back that up but I found his performance exciting enough. Of the Poles he will probably do OK at the smaller tracks like Wolves (possibly similar to how Musielak mastered it in 2017), of course assuming he brings his Polish form to the UK which everyone - particularly Poole fans - are expecting.

I did suggest that it was ceased being discussed but the usual suspect continued discussing it. I see he has done the sensible to move it to the Wolves thread to bore people there. I'm glad you have your thread back tho.

I see you continued boring on the Belle Vue thread, trying to take over as per usual and have the last word. We all know number 4 has 'easier rides'. Only number one is a confirmed position for any of the top 5 other than the number one. ANY other top 5 rider can ride at number 4. There is no such thing as a second strong position anymore. Only the race programme dictates that 2 and 4 are deemed 'easier' positions. I know you have dragged this off the Belle Vue page to reignite it here to continue your 'I'm always right and will have the last word' stance that bores the forum incessantly. It IS opinion because nothing stops ANY team putting their 2nd or 3rd averaged rider at number 2 or 4. Whether or team will or would is open to suggestion and an available option to ALL team managers. I do feel sorry for other forum users that the usual suspect continues his 'I'm right' stance that will no doubt rumble on now that he continues to bore on about the subject.

Wrong. Gavan made the initial comment his average was achieved as a second strong, and has since clarified that remark.