stevebrum

You missed my point. Woryna signed before the season as a Poole asset, whilst Mateusz was already an asset of Poole. Little chance any other club could have then.

Not really tho FB, Woryna signed as a Poole asset and Mateusz is also an asset. No other clubs really stood a chance of signing either.

Wasn't a Wolves. But yes you are absolutely right. Holder has had some great meetings at Monmore.

Someone else carried it on I think you forgot to add. Hope you managed to get some sleep also.

Yet Jacob was in the top 6 away averages last year.

Thanks. I wasn't 100% who it was he beat but decent standard riders for a newcomer. I've seen Holder score double figures at Poole so he can ride the track well, but rarely does. It's only really 1 poster.

I'm sure Woryna beat Freddie at Wolves when riding for Coventry in his first season although lacked the consistency to back that up but I found his performance exciting enough. Of the Poles he will probably do OK at the smaller tracks like Wolves (possibly similar to how Musielak mastered it in 2017), of course assuming he brings his Polish form to the UK which everyone - particularly Poole fans - are expecting.

I did suggest that it was ceased being discussed but the usual suspect continued discussing it. I see he has done the sensible to move it to the Wolves thread to bore people there. I'm glad you have your thread back tho.

I see you continued boring on the Belle Vue thread, trying to take over as per usual and have the last word. We all know number 4 has 'easier rides'. Only number one is a confirmed position for any of the top 5 other than the number one. ANY other top 5 rider can ride at number 4. There is no such thing as a second strong position anymore. Only the race programme dictates that 2 and 4 are deemed 'easier' positions. I know you have dragged this off the Belle Vue page to reignite it here to continue your 'I'm always right and will have the last word' stance that bores the forum incessantly. It IS opinion because nothing stops ANY team putting their 2nd or 3rd averaged rider at number 2 or 4. Whether or team will or would is open to suggestion and an available option to ALL team managers. I do feel sorry for other forum users that the usual suspect continues his 'I'm right' stance that will no doubt rumble on now that he continues to bore on about the subject.

Wrong. Gavan made the initial comment his average was achieved as a second strong, and has since clarified that remark.

Ready to sign his contract as the back up for Linus.

Trying to have the last word as usual, let's kindly respect it's a Belle Vue thread.

Clearly not.

Oops yea, Zengi only rode 3 matches. All clubs have little option with the Polish mafia in charge, Poole included.

Stop discussing your nonsense then. If all teams adopted the traditional team format then it's a way more valid point. The amount of heat 15's tell us a lot more. Anyway, this is a Belle Vue thread so best leave the theories here.

Yes I'm sure Zengota and Kennett were well thought out signings last year.

No such thing as a 'second string position' when riders (besides the number one and reserves) can ride in any other position. Next you will be telling me that Thorrsell didn't finish as 2nd in the averages.

Besides the number one riders could ride anywhere plus he did ride quite a few heat 15's. He rode at 4 all season but as number 2 in the averages. And that is the point! But yea I get that point too.

Thorssell rode all season as 2nd heat leader.

I think any of them would if the price is right. Yes, that's what I thought I read too. If you have more points or options to play with, his average is higher than Ty's

I see that some are including teams with Nilsson in. Didn't I read on the Leicester thread that he wasn't doing UK this year?

31 in February.

Thanks, already awake tho.:t: Ah bless.

Morris already was established as better as things stand. And a good opinion too.