stevebrum

I did suggest that it was ceased being discussed but the usual suspect continued discussing it. I see he has done the sensible to move it to the Wolves thread to bore people there. I'm glad you have your thread back tho.

I see you continued boring on the Belle Vue thread, trying to take over as per usual and have the last word. We all know number 4 has 'easier rides'. Only number one is a confirmed position for any of the top 5 other than the number one. ANY other top 5 rider can ride at number 4. There is no such thing as a second strong position anymore. Only the race programme dictates that 2 and 4 are deemed 'easier' positions. I know you have dragged this off the Belle Vue page to reignite it here to continue your 'I'm always right and will have the last word' stance that bores the forum incessantly. It IS opinion because nothing stops ANY team putting their 2nd or 3rd averaged rider at number 2 or 4. Whether or team will or would is open to suggestion and an available option to ALL team managers. I do feel sorry for other forum users that the usual suspect continues his 'I'm right' stance that will no doubt rumble on now that he continues to bore on about the subject.

Wrong. Gavan made the initial comment his average was achieved as a second strong, and has since clarified that remark.

Ready to sign his contract as the back up for Linus.

Trying to have the last word as usual, let's kindly respect it's a Belle Vue thread.

Clearly not.

Oops yea, Zengi only rode 3 matches. All clubs have little option with the Polish mafia in charge, Poole included.

Stop discussing your nonsense then. If all teams adopted the traditional team format then it's a way more valid point. The amount of heat 15's tell us a lot more. Anyway, this is a Belle Vue thread so best leave the theories here.

Yes I'm sure Zengota and Kennett were well thought out signings last year.

No such thing as a 'second string position' when riders (besides the number one and reserves) can ride in any other position. Next you will be telling me that Thorrsell didn't finish as 2nd in the averages.

Besides the number one riders could ride anywhere plus he did ride quite a few heat 15's. He rode at 4 all season but as number 2 in the averages. And that is the point! But yea I get that point too.

Thorssell rode all season as 2nd heat leader.

I think any of them would if the price is right. Yes, that's what I thought I read too. If you have more points or options to play with, his average is higher than Ty's

I see that some are including teams with Nilsson in. Didn't I read on the Leicester thread that he wasn't doing UK this year?

31 in February.

Thanks, already awake tho.:t: Ah bless.

Morris already was established as better as things stand. And a good opinion too.

Thought Middlo would be the kids entertainer, he knows what kids do these days.

Gutted for Sam. Let's hope the surgery allows him enough recovery time to star the new season. Not a great way to start the year for him. Quick recovery Sam!

Buying assets is a waste of time. Kasprzak will just do 'a Miedzinski' and go where he wants and no sale forced. KK is worth very little anyway, and I'm sure MF is hoping to get top dollar for a rider he knows gives little effort to the UK top flight. Loan it is then unless Rye really want to buy him, poor things!!

Remember he did say he was only saying it to wind us up, unless he believes it of course. So we know what that makes BFM. Not that I doubted it.

Apologies. I get what you meant now. You are correct. I'd assumed Bachelor had an average over 8.:t:

You can compare their averages over 2 seasons, Morris was still the better UK rider and had a higher average both times. There isn't anything else to consider. Referring to 2018. I'm going with trolling. He actually said he was only posting to wind me and you up (and failed miserably). Only real explanation.

Zagar had an average from the old format of only riding heat leaders, the same formula that Lindgren achieved low 6 on. I agree Zagar is the better rider and is World Class. That's why I didn't compare Chris Holder to Morris. There are natural flaws. You are trying to compare a 23 year old with more top flight experience with one who is 21 and only has 2 years experience. Yet you would argue the younger with less experience and a lower average (naturally for both) is already the better rider when at this stage of his career in the UK he is isn't. It's fairly simple really.

Yet the same duo will still claim Kurtz is better. As comical as it is. At least we are all clear that Morris is the better of the 2 in the UK. Glad that's sorted.