stevebrum

You make most stuff up.In your opinion I'm a bully, but your trying to wiggle out after being caught out breaking forum rules by outing my name. The worst form of bullying and rule breaking. You have been caught out and your wriggling is painful to watch. Anyway I'm done communicating further with you on this , your actions are deplorable. Anyway let's give the thread back to the belle Vue and lakeside fans. Time to stop feeding the troll.

You have no proof I'm a bully because I'm not. Your own posts prove you lie, fact.

I'm part of no gang. Being a multiple aliased poster is also against forum rules. Although telling lies is the worst trait of a human being. nobody named his 'true identity' but had a guess without publicly outing him. You accuse me of bullying and I'm accusing you of being a liar.

#prayingforbjarnesknee

You on the other hand already have.

Likewise, and thanks for proving my point. The gift that keeps on giving.

Act tough? I don't need to act. I have not named ANYONE as it's against the rules. Prove me otherwise. You know 100% you will be proven wrong. You break the rules I don't. You can't go about naming people because you are a petty excuse for a human being. Shown up yet again.

How many have I named? ??? None, it's against forum rules and hopefully you will get what you deserve. No one has 'tried to put your real name out'. You have claimed to be something that you have no proof of. So you choose not to out yourself because you clearly don't want your name in a public domain. So what do you ???? You choose to out someone for spite. What a despicable person you are. Plenty on here know who I am but have more respect than you. IT'S AGAINST FORUM RULES and what you have done shows your true colours. The ONLY rule you need to know is 'respect others privacy'. So its YOU that have broke the rules. There isn't a rule I have broken.

Who on earth do the Poles think they are? Feck orf.

And so are Masters and Thorssell. We are worse off with Tai as a second string with easier rides so another plus for Poole, along with your in form guest. But just like Hans, completely expected.

another rule break, keep it up. As previously stated I haven't claimed to be something that I'm not. I have kings Lynn kevlars now. I am not the one claiming to be something they aren't, so you have no proof. If it ever happened. Some people think it's funny to break the forum rules. I feel another ban is imminent.

He hasn't he can't he won't it never happened. All seem to apply.

Whereas I don't wonder about you having 2 profiles and that would involve a small modicum of brain activity. you must have missed my point that Lindback should be on his belle Vue average if we are to play fair and transparent. Selective reading as per usual . but expected from a troll. How can the world number 8 be on a 7 is ridiculous.

Ah bless, trying to out my name. I've never claimed to be anything other than a keen amateur, so your point??

which would make Tai's 2014 average even more credible. I only want a fair and credible assessment when it comes to regrading. IF Lindback had come back on his lower average it would have made more sense than the ridiculous 7 point figure. We either regrade EVERYONE fairly so that all clubs get fair treatment or we carry on making up rules to suit. IMHO anyone coming back to British speedway or doesn't have a recent average should be an 8, that would include Woffy. Some Poole fans are somehow using Tai's real average as a credible argument in defence of this 7 point assessment when let's face it if Antonio came back on his 6 something average gained at belle Vue they would be in no position to judge. My argument is with those making these ridiculous rulings and not any one club or rider.

You mean he came in on his 2014 REAL average. And YES he was that poor in 2014 in the EL, anyone claiming it is false clearly has selective memory issues. Riders SHOULD come in on their real averages if they have ridden here before. You either use riders true averages (Lindback was 7.94) like wolves did with Tai or you use their average from meetings ridden that they failed to complete enough matches for a new one like Wolves did with Piotr in 2014. Both can't be right so which is your preference FB?

So long as assessments or recalculations are done fairly. Piotr came in on a 7 in 2014 due to his previous form and average over the time spent with Coventry but more importantly Poole. As a 19 year old promising Pole who was nothing like the rider he is today some were saying heck doubt achieve that and it was too high. As it turned out he was correctly assessed. So that's for a promising Polish youngster who had shown form previously. Seems perfectly fair and reasonable. So that seems the MINIMUM set standard. Then in 2015 GP rider AJ returns to British Speedway after a lengthy time out on a reassessed 9.03 which again seems fair given that new top standard riders have previously been assessed as 8. Certainly the 'standard' and logic seems to be transparent and fair. Then lo and behold Lindback comes back to British speedway as a (none) long term injury replacement and apparently all those previous transparent and fair assessments go out the window as the new standard is 7, and that will apply to ANY rider out of British speedway or new to EL. So suddenly riders like Dudek, Vaculik, Nicki Pedersen and you can make an argument for any world class rider like Hancock, Hampel, Zmarzlik. Now we have gone beyond logic and transparency.

Yea, seen the Lakeside press release. Seems likely I guess which for us is a great booking if it proves to be correct.

On neither website. Assuming you have as source to quote.

And the current world number 8 is assessed as a 7 point rider, only in British speedway.

Not in the slightest.

Skill, yea right.

Nothing is confirmed. The usual putting 2 and 2 and assuming it's 4.

Clutching at invisible straws now tho.

Absolutely, an honest reply and truthful.