stevebrum

6.50. Not sure where u got 5.76 from?

On dear. North had a 6.62 average start of September. By scoring 13 points over 2 legs he has achieved his average. A rider out of form wouldn't score to their average as you, and others suggested. So the theory is blown out the window. Move along, nothing else to see.

Of course you are right. 13 points from 9 rides isn't bang out of form as moaners like you claimed. Classic bwitcher.

poor thing. It must be awful to realise that the sycophants were right all along. Seems fair, don't know why Coventry felt they had a right to appeal the Poole league result. Result was called on the night. Well said. The play offs yet again prove why they are vital to the sport. What a superb advert so our sport. Play Off sycophant loud and proud. Congratulations to Poole, the deserved winners on the night,over 2 legs and over the season. Belle Vue did themselves proud and can hold their heads held high. Still a little surprised that the 1st leg wasn't amended due to gogglegate and what a finale that would have been. Surprised no one has mentioned the out of form North in the final? 13 points over 2 legs proved Poole gained nothing by using Kennett. Hopefully his performances in the final will make his parents, particularly his dad, proud.

It's all pretty clear. Can't believe anyone can see it was an honest mistake , however rules are rules and the 2 points should be deducted. It's fair and not at all anti Poole to suggest so either.

I was hoping for Zack too, however he is injured so isn't an option anyway.

Yet again i reiterate it isn't part of his job description to do so.

It's not for the start marshall to take action. It isn't in his jurisdiction to take action.

And it's down to any team manager to protest a rule break. Middlo would have and rightly so!

Personally i think some Poole fans are taking this too personally. It's against the rules starman, surely you aren't suggesting that any rule is ignored? Poole fans would rightly be calling for the points removed if it was the aces and no one would be suggesting that would be wrong. Even a 2 point loss on the night to Poole would have been a great result and are still clear favourites to retain the title.

It can and it should. Lots of results have been changed due to a rule break after the meeting. Assuming belle vue complained then there is no reason why the result won't be amended before the 2nd leg.

Only if it was in the rulebook! RP, it's in the rule book so it's nothing against having a go at Poole. I believe Poole will have the 2 points removed before Wednesday, and rightly so. That's the same if it was the Aces or any other team.

Great fight back from the Aces but Poole would have took a draw before the match.

The aces can't deal with the pressure sadly.

If he did he would have been excluded. Nielsen too close and caused his own fall. Correct call.

No he didn't.

Worrall, what a cheat.

Both were stress related. But the stresses were different. Never mind, I had you down as someone that had a fair level of intelligence. Never hurts to be wrong about someone.

There is a comparison because both had a facility for same reason. Different reasons naturally.

Probably the same medic who said josh Grajczonek needed compassionate leave maybe?

DAC has probably become a sycophant and is too ashamed to admit. On the plus side, less negativity on the forum.

Just to add good luck to both teams tonight and this week. Obviously I am likely to side with the Aces (as my 2nd team) So hopefully it will be a great advert for speedway. I love the play offs, even tho my beloved Wolves aren't part of them this year.

So it's an assumed hand injury.And it required an assumed 12 hour operation. Obviously very minor. Suddenly everyone is a stress expert. I'm just putting forward an alternative idea and reason for Dak not riding. Reading and interpreting as you like if it suits your argument. I have some sympathy for both Josh and Dak, how they choose to handle their situations is vastly different. Anyway most have already hung, drawn and quartered Dak and Poole for it. I choose to believe there is a bigger picture to it. I couldn't care less if some agree or not.

What on earth are you on about (I appreciate that's a common complaint hurled at you often). what has anything my comments made to do with Coventry? I am purely pointing out that stress related time out of the sport is subjective. The common complaint we have is that if you are fit for a GP then you are fit to ride. So what's different? so a family issue is less stressful than a fellow rider being injured? As per usual BWitcher trying to make something out of a post that isn't there. grow up. So you admit there was doubt about it, the same way there is doubt in North being not fit mentally to ride. Hence , what's the difference. How do we know he wasn't? ? Honestly some people really put 2 and 2 together and make 5.

Just choice of words. I have read some silly nonsense claiming they are digging for information which is bordering on stalking. Whilst I get the issue of North missing might look dodgy (more that he chose to play golf the next day)how do we judge what is deemed stress related ? Grajczonek missed meeting(s) due to being affected by an injury to another rider, isn't the north situation on a parallel? How can we allow one rider to miss meetings due to bring stressed and not another? I have been MF's biggest critic over the years but I find a hint of irony that some are blasting Poole when others have tried to bend the rules far worse than them this year. Poole have a history of dodgy rule bending over the recent years but I still have some sympathy with North which seems to be ignored whilst praising Josh G when he missed meetings. Smacks of double standards irregardless what anyone thinks of Poole.