As has been suggested on a different thread, is it now time to drop Wilkinson for Simon Lambert.
With Wilkinson's average dropping as fast as s#!+ from a seagull I think we need to react, and quick
Wilkinson 3.60
Lambert 3.11
If Lambert's average goes past Wilkinson's the option will not become available. Thoughts?
Absolutely the best option, for now.
Wilko 3.60
Lambo 3.11
So, are we at the point where Simon has to replace Wilkinson now and run guests when he's unavailable?
Personally, I think we are
Is on the list but can't get a PL side. Would be worse IMO.
If we make a change in reserve I believe one of the Young Stars are the better option as they have home track experience.
Do you take my point? I do take yours but your missing rider's away stats show you were strengthened yes?
Even on the combined averages for 2016, your 3 missing rider's, rounded up come to 18 points
Ok, maths time
Away averages
Thorsell 5.67
Bech 4.00
Howarth 5.33
=15.00
Guests
R/R 5
Bridger 7 (RR scores removed)
Kerr 8 (RR scores removed)
=20
So a +5 over your missing riders = improvement does it not. Certainly wouldn't have seen Bech outscore Bridger and Howarth outscore Kerr. Thorsell would have bettered 5 but not sure he'd of got 11 to have outscored tonight's lineup.
Wolverhampton WERE strengthened tonight
against the odds my a$$ Shovlar #2
Many believed Wolves were in this with us tracking 3 EDR's & Batchelor. You were leading up to heat 7 and only ever 2 behind up to the last race.
Which has been SCB's argument too but I think the rules are written in that as per start of the season. So EDR's will always be #6 & #7 in terms of the rules even if they're in the 1-5.
If that makes sense?
Does to me anyway