lewy Posted yesterday at 05:55 AM Report Share Posted yesterday at 05:55 AM 8 hours ago, Arthur54 said: What did it say Ask a grown up to buy it for you and get your carer to read it to you. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
szkocjasid Posted yesterday at 06:50 AM Report Share Posted yesterday at 06:50 AM 52 minutes ago, lewy said: Ask a grown up to buy it for you and get your carer to read it to you. That's a bit of a daft comment. If you're gonna post that the asset system has changed & affects Poole, surely you'd expect forum users to have a discussion about it? That's what the forum is for. So to then not explain the situation seems really odd to me. Why post a "conversation starter" without enough information for people to have a conversation about it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lewy Posted yesterday at 07:00 AM Report Share Posted yesterday at 07:00 AM 8 minutes ago, szkocjasid said: That's a bit of a daft comment. If you're gonna post that the asset system has changed & affects Poole, surely you'd expect forum users to have a discussion about it? That's what the forum is for. So to then not explain the situation seems really odd to me. Why post a "conversation starter" without enough information for people to have a conversation about it? Not daft at all, it's been explained elsewhere on the forum so need to repeat. Just read the forum! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bitza Posted yesterday at 07:48 AM Report Share Posted yesterday at 07:48 AM (edited) 1 hour ago, szkocjasid said: That's a bit of a daft comment. If you're gonna post that the asset system has changed & affects Poole, surely you'd expect forum users to have a discussion about it? That's what the forum is for. So to then not explain the situation seems really odd to me. Why post a "conversation starter" without enough information for people to have a conversation about it? Makes sense to me. Lewi where on the forum has it already been explained? Edited yesterday at 07:52 AM by Bitza 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
szkocjasid Posted yesterday at 08:14 AM Report Share Posted yesterday at 08:14 AM 25 minutes ago, Bitza said: Makes sense to me. Lewi where on the forum has it already been explained? I echo Bitza's remarks, can Lewi reply to where it has been explained on the forum? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arthur54 Posted yesterday at 08:16 AM Author Report Share Posted yesterday at 08:16 AM Just now, szkocjasid said: I echo Bitza's remarks, can Lewi reply to where it has been explained on the forum? Probably only in Lewys world Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arthur54 Posted yesterday at 08:21 AM Author Report Share Posted yesterday at 08:21 AM 1 hour ago, lewy said: Not daft at all, it's been explained elsewhere on the forum so need to repeat. Just read the forum! Could you let me know where abouts on the forum it is, so my carer can read it too me Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lewy Posted yesterday at 08:23 AM Report Share Posted yesterday at 08:23 AM 8 minutes ago, szkocjasid said: I echo Bitza's remarks, can Lewi reply to where it has been explained on the forum? It's in the speedway news and discussions section. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveLyric2 Posted yesterday at 11:01 AM Report Share Posted yesterday at 11:01 AM 22 hours ago, ASpeedwayfan said: I do agree that a multi round would increase the chance of a surprise and deserved winner, could have 3 rounds spread out across the UK, Poole/ Oxford one round, Glasgow for a round and then the Finale at Manchester. Lambert if he’s riding might win or it’ll be Bewley, unless Brennan can provide a shock? Realistically they are fighting for 3rd spot as that’ll be who gets to be the wildcard to the GP Maybe the possibility of a wildcard to the GP at Belle Vue isn't that attractive to some?! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveLyric2 Posted yesterday at 11:03 AM Report Share Posted yesterday at 11:03 AM Well, if true,then at least it'll stop certain promotions pleading with others to help them put a decent 1-7 together!😃 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lewy Posted yesterday at 11:10 AM Report Share Posted yesterday at 11:10 AM (edited) 9 minutes ago, SteveLyric2 said: Well, if true,then at least it'll stop certain promotions pleading with others to help them put a decent 1-7 together!😃 More lies,isn't Poole's captain a Plymouth asset or should I say was Edited yesterday at 11:15 AM by lewy 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bagpuss Posted yesterday at 11:10 AM Report Share Posted yesterday at 11:10 AM 5 minutes ago, SteveLyric2 said: Well, if true,then at least it'll stop certain promotions pleading with others to help them put a decent 1-7 together!😃 And will stop promotions stock piling 'assets' to fleece others with loan fees. A good thing it's been abolished and should have been years ago. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foreverblue Posted yesterday at 11:41 AM Report Share Posted yesterday at 11:41 AM 29 minutes ago, lewy said: More lies,isn't Poole's captain a Plymouth asset or should I say was Yes he is and we are very happy to have him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neila Posted 22 hours ago Report Share Posted 22 hours ago Nice to see vinnie foord having a good score for worky this afternoon, just shows what riding on a good track does 😛 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gazc Posted 21 hours ago Report Share Posted 21 hours ago 10 hours ago, lewy said: It's in the speedway news and discussions section. Why you feel the need to reply to demands like a scorned child mate is frankly laughable. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foreverblue Posted 18 hours ago Report Share Posted 18 hours ago 4 hours ago, Neila said: Nice to see vinnie foord having a good score for worky this afternoon, just shows what riding on a good track does 😛 Yes he scored well for Poole too, shame we let him go. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
szkocjasid Posted 7 hours ago Report Share Posted 7 hours ago 15 hours ago, Neila said: Nice to see vinnie foord having a good score for worky this afternoon, just shows what riding on a good track does 😛 11 hours ago, foreverblue said: Yes he scored well for Poole too, shame we let him go. I can't avoid comparing Starke's scores to Foord's this season. Poole could've kept Foord but let him go (nothing to do with the points limit), be interesting to see how that works out over the full season. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foreverblue Posted 6 hours ago Report Share Posted 6 hours ago 29 minutes ago, szkocjasid said: I can't avoid comparing Starke's scores to Foord's this season. Poole could've kept Foord but let him go (nothing to do with the points limit), be interesting to see how that works out over the full season. In my view it is a mistake, they dont make many and according to an interview I saw recently with Matt Ford, he makes the team decisions so it is strange he would pick Starke over Foord, yes you may think Starke is on a low average and he will win races at reserve but Foord is the improving one and could improve massively this season. I can only come to the opinion that Matt Ford thought after a couple of incidents last season that Foord was risky in terms of temperament. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LisaColette Posted 5 hours ago Report Share Posted 5 hours ago 1 hour ago, szkocjasid said: I can't avoid comparing Starke's scores to Foord's this season. Poole could've kept Foord but let him go (nothing to do with the points limit), be interesting to see how that works out over the full season. 30 minutes ago, foreverblue said: In my view it is a mistake, they dont make many and according to an interview I saw recently with Matt Ford, he makes the team decisions so it is strange he would pick Starke over Foord, yes you may think Starke is on a low average and he will win races at reserve but Foord is the improving one and could improve massively this season. I can only come to the opinion that Matt Ford thought after a couple of incidents last season that Foord was risky in terms of temperament. Yes, they could have kept Vinnie but I get why they didn't. It was prob more sensible going with Starke imo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daz9100 Posted 3 hours ago Report Share Posted 3 hours ago Starke was signed well before the points limit was raised from 38 to 40. Otherwise things may have been different. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.