Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Plymouth (42) v (48) Poole


jbell1995

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, jbell1995 said:

Plymouth; 1 Kye Thomson (G) 2 Ben Barker (C) 3 Lasse Fredriksen 4 Joe Thompson 5 Scott Nicholls 6 Alfie Bowtell 7 Tom Spencer
 

Poole; 1 Richard Lawson 2 Tobias Thomsen 3 Lewis Kerr 4 Zach Cook (C) 5 Anders Rowe 6 Paul Starke 7 William Cairns

According to the Poole website, Starke and Cairns swop round 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, arnieg said:

I think it works like this:

Rules state that for an unauthorised absence the replacement is a no facility guest [ i.e. 75% guest].

That is the default position.

What a club may then do is declare the rider to be withholding his services and only then do they become eligible for a 100% full fat guest, and as a consequence at that point the rider receives a ban.

But if Ben Cook has received a 28 day ban for the breach of SCB Regulation 010.5 j)

Then Nicolai Klindt should also receive a 28 day ban for breaching SCB Regulation 010.5 p)

🤷‍♂️

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm surprised that Ben Barker is ridding so soon after dislocating his shoulder, hard to see how he can be on top form, we'll see. 

By my quick calculation Poole are now confirmed in the play offs. But would be great to see them push on tonight, it should be a tight match up, so probably a matter of who wants the result most. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, SPEEDY69 said:

Is this meeting being streamed at all and if so is it available to watch afterwards? 

I think as long as you buy it before midnight you can watch but afterwards. But normally tells you any restrictions on the page where you click to pay for it. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, lewy said:

It is being streamed gladiators tv

 

I'll try to find that. https://www.plymouth-speedway.com/ seems really out of date, latest news talks of a postponement a long time ago? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bluekevin said:

Kevin and Jan are on the way, visiting Wildwood  then lunch before seeing Pirates win. Hope all Pirate supporters have a good evening ☠️.

I'm a mile from the track avin me Costa flat white.

C'mon the PIRATES ☠️ 😉

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SPEEDY69 said:

I'll try to find that. https://www.plymouth-speedway.com/ seems really out of date, latest news talks of a postponement a long time ago? 

If you click the three horizontal lines at the top of the page it takes you to a list of options including live streaming.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, tyler42 said:

Plymouth have been using various riders at No7. Why haven't they used Ben Trigger, or is his average too high?

When Nicholls came in they had to drop Trigger to accommodate him and bring in a lower average rider.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, ASpeedwayfan said:

I’m surprised that’s Kerr excluded, didn’t think he did too much wrong, fredriksen went into the back of Joe. 
Nasty crash for all 3 and hope all are fine to continue 

Lewis not at fault. Plymouth fans cannot accept. Grow up.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, arnieg said:

I think it works like this:

Rules state that for an unauthorised absence the replacement is a no facility guest [ i.e. 75% guest].

That is the default position.

What a club may then do is declare the rider to be withholding his services and only then do they become eligible for a 100% full fat guest, and as a consequence at that point the rider receives a ban.

Thanks Arnie

Without wishing to be a pedant, I can't see any regulation that provides that,  without SCB approval in advance ( under 0.10.5 p)

Reg 011.4 c then sets out the reduced facility provision, but, to my mind, that presupposses that a facility is applicable under reg 010.5 in the first place. 

Is there a diifferent reg number you are thinking of? ( I appreciate that it's not your responsibility to satisfy my curiosity! I might e-mail SCB to ask for its view)

If SCB doesn't have to approve in advance what's to stop a rider not going to a track he doesn't like, and for the club to get a 75% reduced facility guest who is a track specialist ( and therefore an improvement on its own rider?)

 

Edited by Sir Sidney
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy