Mgas Posted Tuesday at 05:38 PM Report Share Posted Tuesday at 05:38 PM 2 hours ago, 2ndbend123 said: Last 3 be announced soon I believe they are nearly in place looking like. Craig Cook Daynon Hume Max Perry I think Danyon is still waiting for more surgery. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bandit59 Posted Tuesday at 06:24 PM Report Share Posted Tuesday at 06:24 PM 44 minutes ago, Mgas said: I think Danyon is still waiting for more surgery. Yes, didn't get his surgery last month Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neila Posted Tuesday at 07:46 PM Report Share Posted Tuesday at 07:46 PM 2 hours ago, dellbob said: Cook will be a brilliant signing if it's true Only if he puts in a full season, but still has to potential to be a number 1 IMO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Supersteady84 Posted Tuesday at 10:08 PM Report Share Posted Tuesday at 10:08 PM On 1/4/2026 at 12:25 PM, crescent girl said: On the evidence of my own eyes, Jacob Hook has far outperformed Tate Zischke over the past two nights. I'm not suggesting Workington shouldn't persevere with Tate, that's their business, but I find the decision not to have kept Jacob on board quite baffling. Thats obviously because you don't know the reason why workington didn't resign him.🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Woke23 Posted yesterday at 08:55 AM Report Share Posted yesterday at 08:55 AM 10 hours ago, Supersteady84 said: Thats obviously because you don't know the reason why workington didn't resign him.🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️ Which is what? Don't suggest there is a reason and not tell everyone 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bitza Posted yesterday at 09:02 AM Report Share Posted yesterday at 09:02 AM 13 hours ago, Neila said: Only if he puts in a full season, but still has to potential to be a number 1 IMO Isn't Cook's GSA 8.2? Which minus the UK 2% is still 8+. Maybe I've got the wrong GSA figure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Supersteady84 Posted yesterday at 09:09 AM Report Share Posted yesterday at 09:09 AM 12 minutes ago, Woke23 said: Which is what? Don't suggest there is a reason and not tell everyone Wanted the same sort of money that Jeppesen was getting 🤷♂️ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Supersteady84 Posted yesterday at 09:10 AM Report Share Posted yesterday at 09:10 AM 7 minutes ago, Bitza said: Isn't Cook's GSA 8.2? Which minus the UK 2% is still 8+. Maybe I've got the wrong GSA figure. Its minus 2.5% Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Supersteady84 Posted yesterday at 09:17 AM Report Share Posted yesterday at 09:17 AM 7 minutes ago, Bitza said: Isn't Cook's GSA 8.2? Which minus the UK 2% is still 8+. Maybe I've got the wrong GSA figure. Its minus 2.5% Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bitza Posted yesterday at 09:36 AM Report Share Posted yesterday at 09:36 AM 17 minutes ago, Supersteady84 said: Its minus 2.5% My mistake, 7.995 that really is just scraping in. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foreverblue Posted yesterday at 09:40 AM Report Share Posted yesterday at 09:40 AM (edited) 4 minutes ago, Bitza said: My mistake, 7.995 that really is just scraping in. Maybe that is the problem is it 8 or 7.99 and as far as I know the rules have not been published on that yet. Edited yesterday at 09:42 AM by foreverblue Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Supersteady84 Posted yesterday at 09:43 AM Report Share Posted yesterday at 09:43 AM 2 minutes ago, foreverblue said: Maybe that is the problem is it 8 or 7.99 Ive been told its rounded down to 7.99 🤷♂️ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Supersteady84 Posted yesterday at 09:44 AM Report Share Posted yesterday at 09:44 AM 3 minutes ago, foreverblue said: Maybe that is the problem is it 8 or 7.99 Surely if he'd been signed they would of announced it tho 🤦♂️ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foreverblue Posted yesterday at 09:50 AM Report Share Posted yesterday at 09:50 AM 5 minutes ago, Supersteady84 said: Surely if he'd been signed they would of announced it tho 🤦♂️ You would think so but maybe they were waiting for the agm. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arnieg Posted yesterday at 10:00 AM Report Share Posted yesterday at 10:00 AM 13 minutes ago, Supersteady84 said: Ive been told its rounded down to 7.99 🤷♂️ That would be wrong for two reasons: 1] mathematical convention 2] precedent Lewis Kerr went from 8.60 at the end of 2023 to 8.39 at the start of 2024. But this is all irrelevant if the rule is 'one rider over 8', as 8.00 is not over 8. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Supersteady84 Posted yesterday at 10:09 AM Report Share Posted yesterday at 10:09 AM (edited) 1 hour ago, arnieg said: That would be wrong for two reasons: 1] mathematical convention 2] precedent Lewis Kerr went from 8.60 at the end of 2023 to 8.39 at the start of 2024. But this is all irrelevant if the rule is 'one rider over 8', as 8.00 is not over 8. That's maybe why they've waited for the AGM 🤷♂️ Edited yesterday at 11:36 AM by Supersteady84 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteelShoe Posted yesterday at 12:02 PM Report Share Posted yesterday at 12:02 PM 1 hour ago, arnieg said: That would be wrong for two reasons: 1] mathematical convention 2] precedent Lewis Kerr went from 8.60 at the end of 2023 to 8.39 at the start of 2024. But this is all irrelevant if the rule is 'one rider over 8', as 8.00 is not over 8. Not totally sure but I think 3 decimal places are only used for hierarchial order of riders within a team . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Woke23 Posted yesterday at 01:21 PM Report Share Posted yesterday at 01:21 PM 3 hours ago, arnieg said: That would be wrong for two reasons: 1] mathematical convention 2] precedent Lewis Kerr went from 8.60 at the end of 2023 to 8.39 at the start of 2024. But this is all irrelevant if the rule is 'one rider over 8', as 8.00 is not over 8. Mathematical convention is to round up if its 0.5, 0.05, etc. 2.5% of 8.2 is 0.205. Rounded up is 0.21, giving him an average of 7.99. However, it does matter how its calculated. You can remove 2.5% off 8.2 by multiplying it by 0.975, which would give you 7.995. Is the average the figure to be rounded or the reduction? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arnieg Posted yesterday at 01:32 PM Report Share Posted yesterday at 01:32 PM 9 minutes ago, Woke23 said: Mathematical convention is to round up if its 0.5, 0.05, etc. 2.5% of 8.2 is 0.205. Rounded up is 0.21, giving him an average of 7.99. However, it does matter how its calculated. You can remove 2.5% off 8.2 by multiplying it by 0.975, which would give you 7.995. Is the average the figure to be rounded or the reduction? Mathematical convention is you only round at the last stage so 7.995 becomes 8.00 rather than the reduction being rounded up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Woke23 Posted yesterday at 01:43 PM Report Share Posted yesterday at 01:43 PM 10 minutes ago, arnieg said: Mathematical convention is you only round at the last stage so 7.995 becomes 8.00 rather than the reduction being rounded up. You round up the answer. Is the answer the reduction of the average? Reduction = average × 0.025. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.