False dawn Posted 4 hours ago Report Share Posted 4 hours ago 29 minutes ago, therefused said: should be two in the championship and one in the premiership. I also think instead of forcing teams to sign u21 (or whatever age) there should be a bigger average decreae for british riders in a sliding scale sort of way. Under 21 you get 10% off your average for team building, under 24 you get 5% off, over 24 you get 2.5% off. That way it encourages teams to sign the younger british riders but they are not forced too. I not sure how anyone in the sport can argue against some kind of rising star scheme in the Championship. And while we're at it let's sort out the NDL. Riders who have been around since before my grown up kids were born, riding in a development league is simply nonsense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aries Posted 3 hours ago Report Share Posted 3 hours ago At first glance it seems a decent idea, but it’s going to end the top flight careers of a lot of riders. Kevin Juhl Pedersen and Jason Edwards for example, are simply not going to be employed by a Premiership club in their 1-5. Maybe, someone might have squeezed them in at reserve, Pedersen particularly if someone built top heavy and needed a 3 pointer. 1-5? No chance. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WeymouthPirate Posted 1 hour ago Report Share Posted 1 hour ago 4 hours ago, Arthur73 said: Is this the article you're looking for? https://sportowefakty.wp.pl/zuzel/1275329/pge-ekstraliga-zaproponowala-rewolucje-jest-zielone-swiatlo-wazna-zmiana-o-krok?fbclid=IwY2xjawUhprlleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBwZG9mA3NydGMGYXBwX2lkDzQwOTk2MjYyMzA4NTYwOQABHjTBDGUIXSyRxDB4qFlypqmjWHXmfEO4DEn4_gj_Wbdy6Y5hw7VOLiZHXYiC_aem_rIU0rjZLNLyKmuy6hZgQ9w I do like this idea, I think it will mean premiership clubs will need to be directly involved in young rider development in order to succeed. If it comes in next season though it will mean the teams with cooper rushen and will cairns will be at an advantage. that’s the one! Thank you Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arthur73 Posted 1 hour ago Report Share Posted 1 hour ago 2 hours ago, Aries said: At first glance it seems a decent idea, but it’s going to end the top flight careers of a lot of riders. Kevin Juhl Pedersen and Jason Edwards for example, are simply not going to be employed by a Premiership club in their 1-5. Maybe, someone might have squeezed them in at reserve, Pedersen particularly if someone built top heavy and needed a 3 pointer. 1-5? No chance. May this help with the split between the premiership and championship and reduce doubling up. At the end of the day KJP and Edwards both have averages around 6.00 in the championship so in an ideal world should not really be troubling the premiership before the hit 7-8 in my opinion. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
therefused Posted 1 hour ago Report Share Posted 1 hour ago (edited) They've tinkered around the edges for years with rising stars and whatever they were called beforehand, grading reserves in the championship etc. which led to Boxall and Armstrong at reserve for what was meant to be all season on 7 point averages. Set a points limit and let teams build to it but by all means encourage younger british riders being signed first and foremost, if a team doesnt want a british rider they shouldnt be forced too but with the knowledge they will be signing a rider with a higher average. Edited 1 hour ago by therefused Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikebv Posted 59 minutes ago Report Share Posted 59 minutes ago 9 minutes ago, Arthur73 said: May this help with the split between the premiership and championship and reduce doubling up. At the end of the day KJP and Edwards both have averages around 6.00 in the championship so in an ideal world should not really be troubling the premiership before the hit 7-8 in my opinion. One of the major stumbling blocks to rider development has been the amount of experienced Double Uppers/Downers who have filled two places and not one... Particularly taking up so many places which should have been set aside for development in the 2nd tier... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.