Call me wolfie 677 Posted August 15, 2019 5 minutes ago, waytogo28 said: Only if they have appealed. Vissing has appealed aswell but it was turned down, Kennett has not appealed Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mr Blobby 2,662 Posted August 15, 2019 Chapman would have nothing to do with cook being able to ride, course not. Not like it’s rider is it 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
stevebrum 6,821 Posted August 15, 2019 An absolutely crazy situation to allow one rider to have his ban lifted but not the other. An absolute farce of a decision. 7 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
foreverblue 6,096 Posted August 15, 2019 What new evidence got presented to mean Cook's appeal was valid and not Vissing's? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hamish McRaker 601 Posted August 15, 2019 2 minutes ago, foreverblue said: What new evidence got presented to mean Cook's appeal was valid and not Vissing's? I guess it was down to who was representing the riders' cases, and how well their case was put. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ray c 2,299 Posted August 15, 2019 42 minutes ago, foreverblue said: Is it craig has got the right to appeal in which he has 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
2ndbendbeerhut 1,781 Posted August 15, 2019 15 minutes ago, stevebrum said: An absolutely crazy situation to allow one rider to have his ban lifted but not the other. An absolute farce of a decision. Wonder if Cook's appeal will be removed 2mr .... sorry everyone I'll accept it now I've ridden for the BSPA chairman's club... 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
stevebrum 6,821 Posted August 15, 2019 Just now, 2ndbendbeerhut said: Wonder if Cook's appeal will be removed 2mr .... sorry everyone I'll accept it now I've ridden for the BSPA chairman's club... I wonder if the SCB have lifted this or the BSPA? If so then sounds like involvement from the chairman. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Daniel Smith 5,662 Posted August 15, 2019 4 minutes ago, stevebrum said: I wonder if the SCB have lifted this or the BSPA? If so then sounds like involvement from the chairman. BSPA can't make changes to SCB matters. 4 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Big Al 708 Posted August 15, 2019 Pure speculation here, but possibly Cook had access to corporate lawyers via the Glasgow club to put his case forward, but they didn't, for some reason, put quite such a persuasive case on behalf of Vissing? And maybe Eastbourne/Ipswich have already made satisfactory alternative arrangements for Kennett? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ghosty 500 Posted August 15, 2019 1 minute ago, 2ndbendbeerhut said: Wonder if Cook's appeal will be removed 2mr .... sorry everyone I'll accept it now I've ridden for the BSPA chairman's club... Could an appeal lead to higher penalty for the offender? that's even when one of your bosses is possibly speedway's richest club & your other clubs boss is the BSPA chairman - answers please on a postcard!!!!!!!!!! 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lisa-colette 6,032 Posted August 15, 2019 14 minutes ago, Ghosty said: Could an appeal lead to higher penalty for the offender? that's even when one of your bosses is possibly speedway's richest club & your other clubs boss is the BSPA chairman - answers please on a postcard!!!!!!!!!! SCB have increased bans when appealed before, but this is 10+ years ago, so can't remember who the rider was. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Steve Shovlar 10,439 Posted August 15, 2019 1 hour ago, ray c said: Thats good Nothing good about it. We all saw what Cook did. If he loses the appeal the ban should increase and he will certainly be hit with costs. 1 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
arnieg 3,643 Posted August 15, 2019 If Cook's ban is upheld is there not a risk he could end up missing crucial play- off matches instead of the 'relatively' unimportant ones over the 12 days since the original ban. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
stevebrum 6,821 Posted August 15, 2019 14 minutes ago, Steve Shovlar said: Nothing good about it. We all saw what Cook did. If he loses the appeal the ban should increase and he will certainly be hit with costs. We all saw what all parties did. Eastbourne have got away with no penalty for there disgraceful part of the fracas. 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites