Jump to content
British Speedway Forum
Flappy

Peterborough Panthers 2023

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, DazS said:

yes hes got spinal injury's had a 3 hour hop yesterday also problem with lungs and Broken ankle. not good. fingers crossed for him .

Blimey thanks for update.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 8/27/2023 at 7:05 PM, chrismorton said:

The crowds have been there all season though despite the crap that they've had to put up with..do you think another couple of wins might prompt someone to buy what's left of the club and fund a new stadium?..I get what you're saying but I just can't take British speedway serious anymore and I guess this makes me more comfortable with losing the club..which I'm afraid is inevitable now...but I do hope I'm wrong.

I was told tonight that why Laguta is at Peterborough, we get enough support to be able to afford him and Lynn didn’t.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, bigcatdiary said:

I was told tonight that why Laguta is at Peterborough, we get enough support to be able to afford him and Lynn didn’t.

And presumably bringing Lambert in at Lynn instead means more through the gate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Bagpuss said:

And presumably bringing Lambert in at Lynn instead means more through the gate.

Lambert is cheaper

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, dontforgetthefueltapsbruv said:

I wonder what racesuit he will wear :D

Poole's.   :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, bigcatdiary said:

Lambert is cheaper

And better:D

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, DazS said:

yes hes got spinal injury's had a 3 hour hop yesterday also problem with lungs and Broken ankle. not good. fingers crossed for him .

Fookin hell, I thought the NHS was bad but you get a spinal injury then made to hop for 3 hours :o:D

  • Haha 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, tellboy said:

And better:D

Simon Lambert would have been better than Laguta tonight

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, bigcatdiary said:

I was told tonight that why Laguta is at Peterborough, we get enough support to be able to afford him and Lynn didn’t.

Well on last nights performance would rather have Patryk.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

SHOWGROUND DEVELOPMENT. At last, the council has published AEPG's planning applications (there are two) to develop the showground. You can read and comment on the plans on the council's planning portal at https://www.peterborough.gov.uk/council/planning-and-development/planning-and-building/search-applications references 23/00400/OUT and 23/00412/OUT  Note these are 'outline' applications so do not contain all the detail. That will follow in future applications. The council's outline application consultation is now open for 30 days.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, maneacat said:

Well on last nights performance would rather have Patryk.

 

 

I think that view is shared by everyone, complete waste of everyone’s time turning up and riding a lawnmower 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Mick Bratley said:

SHOWGROUND DEVELOPMENT. At last, the council has published AEPG's planning applications (there are two) to develop the showground. You can read and comment on the plans on the council's planning portal at https://www.peterborough.gov.uk/council/planning-and-development/planning-and-building/search-applications references 23/00400/OUT and 23/00412/OUT  Note these are 'outline' applications so do not contain all the detail. That will follow in future applications. The council's outline application consultation is now open for 30 days.

Thanks for the info Mick.

Is there a best response to these? (ie the proposals do not meet the provisions of the local plan as they propose the demolition of an existing sporting facility, which is fit for purpose and viable, with no provision of a replacement facility either on or off site). 

I've scanned all the supporting documents but most go over my head. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy